DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Carbon and Nitrogen Responses of Litterfall Components by NPK and PK Fertilizers in a Red Pine (Pinus densiflora S. et Z.) Stand

  • Park, Seong-Wan (Department of Forest Resource, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Baek, Gyeongwon (Department of Forest Resource, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kim, Seongjun (Institute of Life Science and Natural Resources, Korea University) ;
  • Yang, A-Ram (Forest Technology and Management Research Center, National Institute of Forest Science) ;
  • Kim, Choonsig (Department of Forest Resource, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology)
  • Received : 2019.01.25
  • Accepted : 2019.03.05
  • Published : 2019.03.31

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) response of litterfall components as affected by N addition in compound fertilizer in a Korean red pine (Pinus densiflora S. et Z.) stand in southern Korea. Litterfall in a mature red pine stand was collected for two years following compound fertilizer application ($N_3P_4K_1$; $P_4K_1$) and no fertilization (control). The C concentration of litterfall components was not significantly (P > 0.05) different between the $N_3P_4K_1$ and the control plots, whereas the N concentration of the litterfall components was significantly higher in the $N_3P_4K_1$ plot than in the control plot. The $N_3P_4K_1$ and $P_4K_1$ additions induced a lower C/N ratio of litterfall components compared with the control plot. Annual C and N fluxes via litterfall components were not affected by the $N_3P_4K_1$ addition over the study period, except for reproduction litter. Annual N fluxes via reproduction litter were significantly higher in the $N_3P_4K_1$ plot than in the control plot. Thus, the $N_3P_4K_1$ and $P_4K_1$ additions could modify differently nutrient distribution of the forest floor and mineral soils in a red pine stand. These results indicate that N concentration and C/N ratio in litterfall components are more susceptible to fertilizer application than the C response in litterfall components.

Keywords

HOMHBJ_2019_v108n1_21_f0001.png 이미지

Figure 1. Monthly temperature and precipitation of the study site.

HOMHBJ_2019_v108n1_21_f0002.png 이미지

Figure 2. Monthly variation of soil NH4+-N and NO3--N concentration (n=6) following fertilizer applications in a red pine stand. Vertical bars represent standard error. Different letters on the bars in dicate significant difference between fertilizer treatment and control plots at P < 0.05.

HOMHBJ_2019_v108n1_21_f0003.png 이미지

Figure 3. Carbon concentration of fertilizer treatment (a), litterfall component (b, NE: needle; HW: hardwood leaf; BR: branches; BK: bark; RP: reproduction; MI: miscellaneous) and sample months (c) following compound fertilizer application in a red pine stand. Vertical bars represent standard error. Different letter on the bars represents a significant difference between fertilizer treatments (a), litterfall components (b), or months (c) at P < 0.05.

HOMHBJ_2019_v108n1_21_f0004.png 이미지

Figure 4. Nitrogen concentration and litterfall component with fertilizer treatment (a) and sampling month (b, NE: needle, HW: hardwood leaves; BR: branches; BK: bark; RP: reproduction; MI: miscellaneous) following compound fertilizer application in a red pine stand. Vertical bars represent standard error. Different letter on the bars represents a significant difference between fertilizer treatments (a) or months (b) at P < 0.05.

HOMHBJ_2019_v108n1_21_f0005.png 이미지

Figure 5. C/N ratio by fertilizer treatment (a) and sampling month (b, NE: needle, HW: hardwood leaves; BR; branches; BK: bark; RP: reproduction; MI: miscellaneous). Vertical bars represent standard error. Different letter on the bars represent a significant difference between fertilizer treatments (a) or months (b) at P < 0.05.

HOMHBJ_2019_v108n1_21_f0006.png 이미지

Figure 6. Carbon (a) and nitrogen fluxes (b) by sampling month and via litterfall components (NE: needle, HW: hardwood leaves; BR: branches; BK: bark; RP: reproduction; MI: miscellaneous) following fertilizer application in a red pine stand. Vertical bars represent standard error. Different letters on the bars indicate a significant difference in carbon flux (a) and nitrogen flux (b) between months (c) at P < 0.05.

Table 1. General stand and soil characteristics of the study site before fertilizer application.

HOMHBJ_2019_v108n1_21_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Results of ANOVA on the effects of compound fertilizer types (F), sampling month (M), and litterfall component (C) on litterfall C and N dynamics following compound fertilizer application in a red pine stand.

HOMHBJ_2019_v108n1_21_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Carbon and nitrogen fluxes via litterfall components by compound fertilizer types.

HOMHBJ_2019_v108n1_21_t0003.png 이미지

References

  1. Baek, G., Yang, A.R. and Kim, C. 2018. Carbon and nitrogen resorption of needles as affected by compound fertilizer in a red pine stand. Forest Science and Technology 12: 126-131. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2018.1475308
  2. Berg, B. and Laskowski, R. 2006. Litter decomposition; A guide to carbon and nutrient turnover. Advances in Ecological Research 38: 20-71.
  3. Bray, J.R. and Gorham, E. 1964. Litter production in forests of the world. Advances in Ecological Research 2: 101-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60331-1
  4. Huang, X., Cui, J., Yu, X., Tao, X. and Xu, X. 2016. Litterfall response to nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization in subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest of 80-year-old. Bangladesh Journal of Botany 45: 1035-1042.
  5. Jeong, J., Jo, C.G., Baek, G.W., Park, J.H., Ma, H.S., Yoo, B.O. and Kim, C. 2017. Soil and the foliage nutrient status following soil amendment applications in a Japanese cypress (Chamaecyparis obtuse Endlicher) plantation. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 36: 289-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2017.1296778
  6. Joo, J.S., Lee, W.K., Kim, T.H., Lee, C.Y., Jin, I.S., Park, S.K. and Oh, M.Y. 1983. Studies on fertilization in pruning and thinning stands. The Research Report of Forest Research Institute 30: 155-189.
  7. Kim, C., Koo, K.S. and Byun, J.K. 2005. Litterfall and nutrient dynamics in pine (Pinus rigida) and larch (Larix leptolepis) plantations. Journal of Korean Forest Society 94: 302-306.
  8. Kim, C., Son, Y., Lee W.K., Jeong, J. and Noh, N.J. 2009. Influence of forest tending works on carbon distribution and cycling in a Pinus densiflora S et. Z. stands in Korea. Forest Ecology and Management 257: 1420-1426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.12.015
  9. Kim, C., Byun, J.K., Park, J.H. and Ma, H.S. 2013a. Litter fall and nutrient status of green leaves and leaf litter at various compound ratios of fertilizer in sawtooth oak stands, Korea. Annals of Forest Research 56: 339-350.
  10. Kim, C., Jeong, J. and Kim, J.S. 2013b. Carbon and nitrogen inputs by litter fall in fertilized and unfertilized larch plantations. Forest Science and Technology 7: 17-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2011.559932
  11. Kim, Y., Byun, J.K., Kim, C., Park, B.B., Kim, Y.K. and Bae, S.W. 2014. Growth response of Pinus densiflora seedlings to different fertilizer compound ratios in a recently burned area in the eastern coast of Korea. Landscape and Ecological Engineering 2014: 241-247.
  12. Kim, C., Jeong, J., Park, J.H. and Ma, H.S. 2015. Growth and nutrient status of foliage as affected by tree species and fertilization in a fire-disturbed urban forest. Forests 6: 2199-2213. https://doi.org/10.3390/f6062199
  13. Kim, C., Baek, G., Park, S.W. and Kim, S. 2017. Inorganic nitrogen dynamics of throughfall following fertilization in a red pine stand. Forest Science and Technology 13: 187-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2017.1394372
  14. Lee, I.K. and Son Y. 2006. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on nutrient dynamics and litterfall production of Pinus rigida and Larix kaempferi. Journal of Ecology and Field Biology 29: 205-212. https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2006.29.3.205
  15. Mayor, J.R., Wright, S.J. and Turner, B.L. 2014. Species-specific responses of foliar nutrients to long-term nitrogen and phosphorus additions in a lowland tropical forest. Journal of Ecology 102: 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12190
  16. Poorter, H. and De Jong, R. 1999. A comparison of specific leaf area, chemical composition and leaf construction costs of field plants from 15 habitats differing in productivity. New Phytologist 143: 163-176. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00428.x
  17. Sariyildiz, T. and Anderson, J.M. 2005. Variation in the chemical composition of green leaves and leaf litters from three deciduous tree species growing on different soil types. Forest Ecology and Manageent 210: 303-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.043
  18. SAS Institute Inc. 2003. SAS/STAT Statistical software. Version 9.1. SAS publishing Cary, NC.
  19. Sardans, J., Frau, O., Chen, H.Y.H., Hanssens, I.A., Ciais, P., Piao, S. and Penuelas, J. 2017. Changes in nutrient concentrations of leaves and roots in response to global change factors. Global Change Biology 23: 3849-3856. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13721
  20. Sato, T. 2004. Litterfall dynamics after a typhoon disturbance in a Castanopsis cuspidata coppice, southwestern Japan. Annals of Forest Science 61: 431-438. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2004036
  21. Smaill, S.J., Clinton, P.W. and Greenfield, L.G. 2008. Nitrogen fertiliser effects on litter fall, FH layer and mineral soil characteristics in New Zealand Pinus radiata plantations. Forest Ecology and Management 256: 564-569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.05.026
  22. Weetman, G.F. and Wells, C.G. 1990. Plant Analyses as an Aid in Fertilizing Forests. pp. 659-690. In : R.L. Westerman. (Ed). 3rd Ed. In soil testing and plant analysis. SSSA, Wisconsin, USA.
  23. Vose, J.M. and Allen, H L. 1991. Quantity and timing of needlefall in N and P fertilized loblolly pine stands. Forest Ecology and Management 41: 205-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(91)90104-4
  24. Yang, Y., Yanai, R.D., See, C.R. and Arthur, M.A. 2017. Sampling effort and uncertainty in leaf litterfall mass and nutrient flux in northern hardwood forests. Ecosphere 8: e01999. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1999

Cited by

  1. Phosphorus and Base Cation Inputs through Litterfall Components in Pine Forests after Tree Removal Due to Pine Wilt Disease Disturbance vol.108, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.14578/jkfs.2019.108.3.296