한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육 (The Mathematical Education)

  • 제58권1호
  • /
  • Pages.139-160
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 1225-1380(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-9633(eISSN)
한국수학교육학회 (Korean Society of Mathematical Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한국과 미국 중학교 교과서의 통계 영역 수학과제가 제시하는 통계적 추론에 대한 학습기회 탐색

How middle-school mathematics textbooks of Korea and the US support to develop students' statistical reasoning

  • 투고 : 2019.01.31
  • 심사 : 2019.02.27
  • 발행 : 2019.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study attempts to examine statistical tasks in the middle-school mathematics textbooks of Korea and Connected Mathematics 3 [CMP] of the US in terms of an opportunity-to-learn for statistical reasoning. We utilized an analytical framework consisting of types of context, statistical reasoning level, cognitive demand of the tasks, and types of student response. The findings from the task analysis suggested that Korean textbooks focused on finding answers by applying previously learned algorithms or formulas and thus provided students with very limited opportunities to experience statistical reasoning. Also, the results proposed that the mathematical tasks in statistics unit of CMP3 offer more essential and complex tasks that promote students' conceptual understanding of various statistical ideas and statistical reasoning in a meaningful way.

키워드

SHGHBU_2019_v58n1_139_f0001.png 이미지

[그림 1] A교과서의 상황과제분석 예시 [Fig. 1] An analysis of a context-task in textbook A

SHGHBU_2019_v58n1_139_f0002.png 이미지

[그림2] CMP3의 상황과제분석 예시 [Fig. 2] An analysis of a context task in CMP3

SHGHBU_2019_v58n1_139_f0003.png 이미지

[그림 3] 통계적 추론 촉진하지 않는 상황과제 예시 (C 교과서, 2014, p. 171) [Fig. 3] A Context-task that does not promote statistical reasoning (Textbook C, 2014, p. 171)

SHGHBU_2019_v58n1_139_f0004.png 이미지

[그림 4] 대푯값 과제(C교과서, 2014, p. 160) [Fig. 4] A task for finding mean, median and mode (Textbook C, 2014, p, 160)

SHGHBU_2019_v58n1_139_f0005.png 이미지

[그림 5] 같은 유형의 과제 반복(A교과서, 2018, p. 265) [Fig. 5] Similar tasks repetition (Textbook A, 2018, p. 265)

SHGHBU_2019_v58n1_139_f0006.png 이미지

[그림 6] 답만 요구하는 과제 (C교과서, 2014, p. 158) [Fig. 6] A task that requires only answers (Textbook C, 2014, p. 158)

SHGHBU_2019_v58n1_139_f0007.png 이미지

[그림 7] 유의미 맥락 과제 (CMP3-8, 2014, p. 88-92) [Fig. 7] Relevant and essential context tasks (CMP3-8, 2014, p. 88-92)

SHGHBU_2019_v58n1_139_f0008.png 이미지

[그림 8] 통계적 추론 과제 (CMP3-8, 2014, p. 82-84) [Fig. 8] Tasks for promoting statistical reasoning (CMP3-8, 2014, p. 82-84)

SHGHBU_2019_v58n1_139_f0009.png 이미지

[그림 9] 상관관계 과제 (CMP3-8, 2014, p. 85-86) [Fig. 9] A mathematical task for correlations (CMP3-8, 2014, p. 85-86)

SHGHBU_2019_v58n1_139_f0010.png 이미지

[그림 10] High-level 과제 (CMP3-7, 2014, p. 67) [Fig. 10] High-level Tasks (CMP3-7, 2014, p. 67)

SHGHBU_2019_v58n1_139_f0011.png 이미지

[그림 11] High-level 과제 (CMP3-7, 2014, p. 67) [Fig. 11] High-level tasks (CMP3-7, 2014, p. 67)

SHGHBU_2019_v58n1_139_f0012.png 이미지

[그림 12] CMP3 통계 과제 (CMP3-7, 2014, p. 35-37) [Fig. 12] Tasks in CMP3 (CMP3-7, 2014, p. 35-37)

[표 1] 2015 교육과정 수학 교과역량(교육부, 2015) [Table 1] 2015National curriculum:mathematical competencies(Ministryof Education, 2015)

SHGHBU_2019_v58n1_139_t0001.png 이미지

[표 2] 중학교 1-3학년 통계영역 성취기준(교육부, 2015) [Table 2] Grade level expectations for grades 7-9 statistics (Ministry of Education, 2015)

SHGHBU_2019_v58n1_139_t0002.png 이미지

[표 3] 한국과 미국의 중학교 통계영역 내용 비교 [Table 3] Mathematical ideas in statistics in the curriculum of Korea and the US

SHGHBU_2019_v58n1_139_t0003.png 이미지

[표 4] 통계의 Big Ideas (Kader, et al., 2013) [Table 4] Big Ideas for statistics (Kader, et al., 2013)

SHGHBU_2019_v58n1_139_t0004.png 이미지

[표 5] 분석틀 [Table 5] A framework for data analysis

SHGHBU_2019_v58n1_139_t0005.png 이미지

[표 6] 2015 개정 교육과정 중학교 1학년 교과서 통계 단원 구성 [Table 6] Topics of statistics in textbooks for grade 7 (2015 Curriculum)

SHGHBU_2019_v58n1_139_t0006.png 이미지

[표 7] 2009 개정 교육과정 중학교 3학년 교과서 통계 단원 구성 비교 [Table 7] Topics of statics in textbooks for grade 9 (2009 Curriculum)

SHGHBU_2019_v58n1_139_t0007.png 이미지

[표 8] CMP3 통계 단원 구성 [Table 8] Topics of statics for CMP3

SHGHBU_2019_v58n1_139_t0008.png 이미지

[표 9] 수학교과서의 수학과제 개수 [Table 9] The number of mathematical tasks in the textbooks

SHGHBU_2019_v58n1_139_t0009.png 이미지

[표 10] 한국 교과서 상황과제의 통계적 추론 [Table 10] Context-tasks promoting statistical reasoning suggested in Korean textbooks

SHGHBU_2019_v58n1_139_t0010.png 이미지

[표 11] 한국 교과서 수학과제의 인지적 노력수준 [Table 11] The levels of cognitive demand of the mathematical tasks in the Korean textbooks

SHGHBU_2019_v58n1_139_t0011.png 이미지

[표 12] CMP3 통계 상황과제의 인지적 노력수준 [Table 12] The levels of cognitive demand of context tasks in CMP3

SHGHBU_2019_v58n1_139_t0012.png 이미지

[표 13] CMP3 상황과제의 학생의 응답유형 [Table 13] Context tasks in CMP3: Type of student response

SHGHBU_2019_v58n1_139_t0013.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. Kang, O. et al. (2014). Middle School Mathematics 3. Seoul: Dong-A.
  2. Go, S. M., Kim, M. S., Jung, J. K., & Cho, W. Y. (2017). Analysis of the problems in statistics units of middle school textbooks for the 3rd grade in terms of statistical literacy. School Mathematics 19(4), 731-749.
  3. Ministry of Education (2015). Mathematics Curriculum. 2015-74. Author.
  4. Kwon, J. &　Kim, G. (2013). An analysis of mathematical tasks for middle school geometry. The Mathematical Education, 52(1), 111-128. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2013.52.1.111
  5. Kim, G. & Jeon, M. (2017b). Exploring how middle-school mathematics textbooks on functions provide students an opportunity-to-learn. School Mathematics, 19(2), 289-317.
  6. Kim, G. & Jeon, M. (2017b). Exploring teachers' pedagogical design capacity: How mathematics teachers plan and design their mathematics lessons. The Mathematical Education, 56(4), 365-385. https://doi.org/10.7468/MATHEDU.2017.56.4.365
  7. Kim, M. & Kim, G. (2013). An analysis of matheamtical tasks in the high school mathematics. School Mathematics, 15(1), 37-59.
  8. Kim, M. (2013). Secondary mathematics teachers' use of mathematics textbooks and teacher's guide. School Mathematics 16(3), 503-531.
  9. Kim, W., Choi, S. H., & Kim, D. J. (2018). Reconstruction and application of an analytic framework for discursive approach to interpretations of graph: The case of a Korean textbook and CMP. The Mathematical Education, 57(4), 433-452. https://doi.org/10.7468/MATHEDU.2018.57.4.433
  10. Park, K. S. et al. (2018). Middle School Mathematics 1. Seoul: Dong-A.
  11. Shin, H. K. et al. (2014). Middle School Mathematics 1. Seould: Jihaksa.
  12. Chang, K. Y. et al. (2018). Middle School Mathematics 1. Seould: Jihaksa.
  13. Jeon, M. & Kim, G. (2015). Measuring and analyzing prospecitve secondary teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching[MKT]. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics 25(4), 691-715.
  14. Chung, Y. O. et al. (2016). A comparative study of mathematics curriculum among the United States, Singapore, England, Japn, Australia, and Korea. Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26(3), 371-402.
  15. Hong, C. J. & Kim, G. (2012). Functions in the middle school mathematics: The cognitive demand of the mathematical tasks. School Mathematics, 14(2), 213-232.
  16. Ben-Zvi, D. & Garfield, J. (2004). Statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking: Goals, definitions, and challenges. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield. (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning and thinking. (pp. 3-15). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
  17. Cain J. S. (2002). An evaluation of the Connected Mathematics Project. Journal of Educational Research 95(4), 224-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670209596595
  18. Charalambous, C. Y., Delaney, S., Hsu, H., & Mesa, V. (2010). A comparative anlysis of the addition and subtraction of fractions in textbooks from three countries. Mathematical thinking and learning, 12, 117-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060903460070
  19. Davies, N. & Marriott, J. (2010). Assessment and feedback in statistics. In P. Bidgood, N. Hunt, & F. Jolliffe (Eds.), Assessment methods in statistical education: An international perspective (pp. 3-19). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.
  20. DelMas, R. C. (2002). Statistical literacy, reasoning, and learning: A commentary. Journal of Statistics Education, 10(3). Retrieved June 29, 2015, from http://www.amstat.org/publcations/jse/
  21. Franklin. C. A. & Garfield. J. B. (2006). The GAISE Project: Developing statistics education guidelines for grades Pre-K-12 and college courses. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  22. Graumann, G. (2011). Mathematics for problems in everyday world. In J. Maasz, & J. O'Donoghue (Eds.), Real-world problems for secondary school mathematics students: Case studies (pp. 113-122). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
  23. Haggarty, L. & Pepin, B. (2002). An investigation of mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German classroom: Who gets an opportunity to learn what? British Educational Research Journal 28(4), 567-590 https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192022000005832
  24. Jolliffe, F. (2010). Assessing statistical thinking. In P. Bidgood, N. Hunt, & F. Jolliffe (Eds), Assessment Methods in Statistical Eduction: An International Perspective (pp. 71-74). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.
  25. Kader, G. D., Jacobbe, T., Wilson, P., & Zbiek, R. M. (2013). Developing essential understanding of statistics for teaching mathematics in grades 6-8. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  26. Lappan, G., Phillips, E. D., Fey, J. T., & Friel. S. N. (2014). Connected Mathematics3; Grade 7. Boston: Pearson.
  27. Lappan, G., Phillips, E. D., Fey, J. T., & Friel. S. N. (2014). Connected mathematics 3; grade 8. Boston: Pearson.
  28. Lavine, N. C. & Lajoie, S. P. (2007). Statistical reasoning of middle school children engaged in survey inquiry. Contemporary Educational Psychology 32(4) 630-666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.09.001
  29. Muller, E. & Burkhardt, H. (2007). Applications and modelling for mathematics: Overview. In W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H. Henn, & M. Niss (Eds.), Modeling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI study (pp. 267-274). London: Springer.
  30. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
  31. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author.
  32. Pfannkuch, M. & Ben-Zvi, D. (2011) Developing teacher's statistical thinking. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, & C. Reading (Eds.), Teaching statistics in school mathematics-challenges for teaching and teacher education: A joint ICMI/ IASE study (pp. 323-333). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
  33. Reys, B. J., Reys, R. E., & Chavez, O. (2004). Why mathematics textbooks matter. Educational Leadership 61-66.
  34. Reys, R. E, Reys, B. J., Lapan, R., Holiday, G., & Wasman, D. (2003). Assessing the impact of Standard-based middle grades mathematics curriculum materials on student achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34, 74-95. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034700
  35. Schield, M. (2010). Assessing statistical literacy: Take CARE. In P. Bidgood, N. Hunt, & F. Jolliffe (Eds), Assessment Methods in Statistical Eduction: An International Perspective (pp. 134-152). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.
  36. Senk, S. L., & Thompson, D. R. (2003). Middle school mathematics curriculum reform. In S. L. Senk & D. R. Thompson (Eds.), Standards-based school mathematics curricula: What are they? What do students learn? (pp. 181-191). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  37. Smith, M. S. & Stein, M. K. (1998). Selecting and creating mathematical tasks: from research to practice. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3, 344-350. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.3.5.0344
  38. Stein, M. K., & Lane, S. (1996). Instructional tasks and the development of student capacity to think and reason: An analysis of the relationship between teaching and learning in a reform mathematics project. Educational Research and Evaluation, 2, 50-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/1380361960020103
  39. Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M. A., & Silver, E. A. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  40. Wijaya, A., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. & Doorman, M. (2015). Opportunity-to-learn context-based tasks provided by mathematics textbooks. Educational Studies in Mathematics 89, 41-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9595-1

피인용 문헌

  1. 수학 교사의 교과서 이해 및 활용 의도 탐색 vol.60, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2021.60.1.111
  2. 학생 사고기반 수학 수업의 특징과 그 실제 vol.35, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2021.35.1.37