DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Construction Policy System for Quality Assurance of Construction Used Steels

건설용 강재의 품질확보를 위한 건설제도 분석 연구

  • Yoon, Jongsik (Department of Architectural Engineering, Graduate School of Ajou University) ;
  • Yu, Ilhan (Future Strategy Division, Korea Research Institute for Construction Policy) ;
  • Kim, Kyungrai (Department of Architectural Engineering, Graduate School of Ajou University) ;
  • Jung, Daewoon (Korea Research Institute for Construction Policy)
  • Received : 2018.05.23
  • Accepted : 2018.10.23
  • Published : 2019.01.31

Abstract

Recently, quality problems of steel used for construction have been raised as a cause of building collapse and safety accidents. Accordingly, it becomes more important to secure quality through material management, procurement management, and construction management for construction used steels. However, the quality management for construction used steels is confined to technical production and process control. So, it does not provide a solution of various non-conforming steel products issues. Therefore, this study suggests improvements of the construction system to secure quality of the construction used steels. Through expert interviews, we identify the items for system improvement and derive the top priority items by considering utility through a structured Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). It also divided the respondents into enterprise and research groups to analyze differences, implications and future improvement issues and suggest a road map. It is expected that the priority items derived in this study could be useful as a basic data for making policy decisions to assure the quality of construction used steel.

최근 발생한 건축물 붕괴 및 안전사고 사례의 주요 원인으로 건설용 강재의 품질문제가 꾸준히 제기되고 있다. 이에 따라 건설용 강재에 대한 자재관리, 유통관리, 시공관리를 통한 품질확보 이슈가 주요 문제로 떠오르고 있는 실정이다. 그러나 건설용 강재의 품질관리 방안은 기술적인 생산, 공정관리에 국한되어 있어 최근 발생하는 각종 부적합 철강재 관리에 대한 대안을 제시하지 못하고 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 건설관련 제도정책 측면에서 건설용 강재의 품질개선 방안을 제시하고자 한다. 건설용 강재관련 전문가 심층면담을 통한 제도개선 과제 아이템을 발굴하고, 이를 구조화된 AHP분석을 통해 기대효용성을 고려하여 최우선 중요과제를 도출한다. 또한 응답자를 분류하여 기업과 학계/연구계의 의견을 비교 분석하여 시각차와 시사점, 향후 개선방안에 대한 로드맵을 제시하였다. 본 연구에서 도출된 우선순위 제도개선과제들은 향후 건설용 강재의 품질향상을 위한 정책적 의사결정의 기초자료로 유용하게 사용될 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

Keywords

GGRHC4_2019_v20n1_3_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Research progress

GGRHC4_2019_v20n1_3_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Social awareness of buildings and facilities (KOSIS, 2016)

GGRHC4_2019_v20n1_3_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Main subject pairwise comparison result

GGRHC4_2019_v20n1_3_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 4. Normalization weight (Enterprise, Architectural research)

GGRHC4_2019_v20n1_3_f0005.png 이미지

Fig. 5. The priority evaluation result of improvement item(enterprise vs architectural research)

GGRHC4_2019_v20n1_3_f0006.png 이미지

Fig. 6. The road map for key improvement items

Table 1. Process for deriving improvement subjects (Revised Jung & Yu, 2016)

GGRHC4_2019_v20n1_3_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Expert description

GGRHC4_2019_v20n1_3_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Overview of construction system analysis

GGRHC4_2019_v20n1_3_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Analysis of construction system

GGRHC4_2019_v20n1_3_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Hierarchical Structure

GGRHC4_2019_v20n1_3_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6. Respondent overview

GGRHC4_2019_v20n1_3_t0006.png 이미지

Table 7. Main subject pairwise comparison result

GGRHC4_2019_v20n1_3_t0007.png 이미지

Table 8. Normalization weight (all)

GGRHC4_2019_v20n1_3_t0008.png 이미지

Table 9. Normalization weight (Enterprise, Architectural research)

GGRHC4_2019_v20n1_3_t0009.png 이미지

Table 10. The priority evaluation result of improvement item

GGRHC4_2019_v20n1_3_t0010.png 이미지

Table 11. The priority evaluation result of improvement item (enterprise vs architectural research)

GGRHC4_2019_v20n1_3_t0011.png 이미지

References

  1. Jeong, S., and Lee, H. (2016). "A Study on the Comparative Analysis of the Quality Management System of Temporary Equipment and Materials." Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea, 32(9), pp. 43-50.
  2. Jung, D., and Yu, I. (2016). "Survey on the actual condition and perception of imported steel for construction." Construction Engineering and Management, 17(3), pp. 43-48.
  3. Jung, I. (2008). "Alternative Evaluation Methodology in the Development of Environmental-friendly Residential Land using Fuzzy Inference and AHP." Thesis, Incheon University.
  4. Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance Inspection (KISMI) (2015). Emergency Management for Building Public Safety Against Earthquake and Climate Change Hazards, pp. 15-18.
  5. Kyung, K., Lee, M., Park, Y., Lee, E., and Kim, K. (2015). "A Brief Review on Quality Improvement of Construction Materials and Members in Construction Works." Magazine of the Korean Society of Steel Construction, 27(4), pp. 48-56.
  6. Lee, H., Yoon, Y., and Suh, S. (2004). "A Study on the Method of New Activity Based Cost Management Coping with Changes in the Cost Structure of Real Estate Construction Industry." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 5(1), pp. 133-139.
  7. Lee, J., Cho, H., Son, K., and Yoo, J. (2015). "Order of Priority Analysis of Internal Marketing Factors in Construction Company by Using AHP Method." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 16(1), pp. 44-51. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2015.16.1.044
  8. Oh, K., Song, J., Lee, J., and Park, S. (2009). "Information Integrated Management through Life Cycle of Construction Materials in Apartment Housing." Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea, 25(8), pp. 175-183.
  9. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, McGraw-Hill.
  10. Statistics Korea. (2016). "Statistics Korea data base." (Nov. 15, 2016).
  11. Wanberg, J., Harper, C., Hallowell, M. R., and Rajendran, S. (2013). "Relationship between construction safety and quality performance." Journal of construction engineering and management, 139(10), 04013003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000732
  12. Yoon, J., Shin, D., Cha, H., and Kim, K. (2017). "A Study on Improvement of Modular Specifications - Focused on technical specifying method in waterproof and mechanical works -" Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 18(3), pp. 33-41. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2017.18.3.033