Fig 1. Typical wing cross section
Fig 2. Wing structure
Fig 3. Schematic diagram of a circular spar with cap
Fig 4. Setup in torsion test
Fig 5. Dimension of test specimen
Fig 6. Test specimens
Fig 7. Torsional response for M30-1
Fig 8. Torsional response for M30-2
Fig 9. Torsional response for M30-3
Fig 10. Torsional response for M30-4
Fig 11. Torsional response for M30-5
Fig 12. Torsional buckling ratio versus inplane stiffness ratio
Fig 13. Buckling mode of tubular composite tube
Fig 14. FEM model for torsional rigidity analysis
Table 1. Summary of layup and dimension of specimen
Table 2. Material properties of CFRP lamina
Table 3. Torsional buckling strength versus inplane stiffness
Table 4. Comparison of torsional buckling strength between tests and numerical results
Table 5. Comparison of torsional rigidity between tests and numerical results
References
- H. Ross, "Fly around the World with a Solar Powered Airplane", The 26th Congress of International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences proceedings, 2008
- S. J. Kim, S. Lee, S. C. Kim, T. Kim and S. Kim, "Structural Design and Analysis for High Altitude Long Endurance UAV," Journal of the korean society for aeronautical and space science, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2014, pp. 68-73
- S. J. Kim, D. H. Kim, J. Lim, S. W. Lee and T. Kim, "Structural analysis of flexible wing using linear equivalent model" Journal of The Korean Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, Vol. 43, No. 8, 2015, pp. 699-705 https://doi.org/10.5139/JKSAS.2015.43.8.699
- S. J. Kim, J. W. Shin, H. Kim, T. Kim and S. Kim "The modified Brazier approach to predict the collapse load of a stiffened circular composite spar under bending load", Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 55, 2016, pp. 474-481 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2016.06.018
- A. Qureshi and H. Gangna, "Torsional response of closed FRP composite sections", Composites : Part B, Vol. 61, pp. 254-266
- R. M. Jones, Mechanics of composite materials, Hemisphere publishing corporation, 1975