The Journal of Korean Academy of Sensory Integration (대한감각통합치료학회지)

Korean Academy of Sensory Integration (대한감각통합치료학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study of Validity and Interrater Reliability of Korean Version of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale 2

한글판 Peabody Developmental Motor Scale 2의 타당도와 검사자간 신뢰도 연구

  • Lee, Ji-Ho (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Graduate School, Inje University) ;
  • Kim, Kyeong-Mi (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, College of Health and Medical Affairs, Inje University) ;
  • Chang, Moon-Young (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, College of Health and Medical Affairs, Inje University) ;
  • Hong, Eunkyoung (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Shinsung University)
  • 이지호 (인제대학교 대학원 작업치료학과) ;
  • 김경미 (인제대학교 보건의료융합대학 작업치료학과) ;
  • 장문영 (인제대학교 보건의료융합대학 작업치료학과) ;
  • 홍은경 (신성대학교 작업치료과)
  • Received : 2019.08.12
  • Accepted : 2019.12.13
  • Published : 2019.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective : This study aims to verify the content validity and inter-rater reliability of the Korean version of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale 2 (PDMS-2) and to identify the concurrent validity by comparing it with the Korean version of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-2 (BOT-2). Methods : PDMS-2 was translated by the researcher and an eighth-year clinical occupational therapist. The content consistency of the Korean version of the PDMS-2 was verified by three professors with experience using it. After the verification of the content consistency of the PDMS-2 by the five clinical occupational therapists and the additional revision, the Korean version of the PDMS-2 was completed. The researcher and another occupational therapist evaluated the Korean version of PDMS-2 in 50 children and measured the inter-rater reliability. Concurrent validity was measured by comparing the results of the Korean version of PDMS-2 and Korean version of BOT-2. Results : The content consistency test showed overall agreement of mean 3.45, and the content understanding test showed a high level of understanding of mean 3.69. The inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity of the Korean version of the PDMS-2 showed a statistically significant correlation. Conclusion : The Korean version of the PDMS-2 showed high content understanding, reliability, and validity. It can assist clinicians and researchers who work in fields related to child treatment or development.

목적 : 본 연구는 Peabody Developmental Motor Scale 2(PDMS-2)의 국내사용을 위하여 번역연구와 검사자간 신뢰도 및 동시타당도를 검증하는 것이다. 연구방법 : PDMS-2의 번역연구는 2명의 작업치료사가 각각 번역하여, 3명의 작업치료학과 교수를 통해 번역 내용타당도를 검증하였다. 그 후 임상 작업치료사 5명을 대상으로 내용이해도 검증을 받아 수정보완 후 한글판 PDMS-2를 제시 하였다. 일반 아동 50명을 대상으로 검사자간 신뢰도는 두 작업치료사가 한글판 PDMS-2를 각각 평가하여 검사자간 신뢰도를 측정하였고, 동시타당도는 한글판 PDMS-2와 한국판 Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-2(BOT-2)를 사용하여 검증하였다. 결과 : 연구결과 번역에 대한 내용일치도는 평균3.45점으로 일치하였고, 내용이해도는 평균 3.69점으로 높은 이해도를 보였다. 검사자간 신뢰도는 급내상관계수의 범위가 .941에서 .994로 나타났다. 동시타당도는 상관계수 r값이 항목에 따라 .951-.651으로 통계적 유의미한 상관관계를 보였다. 결론 : 한글판 PDMS-2는 아동의 운동기능을 평가하는 도구로서 높은 신뢰도와 타당도를 가진 것으로 나타났다. 한글판 PDMS-2는 아동의 운동기능 평가와 치료의 효과를 측정하는 도구로 사용가능하며, 치료의 중재나 목표 설정과 교육 및 연구를 위해 유용하게 사용될 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. An, S. Y. (2012). Statistical methods for assessment of validities and reliabilities. Master's thesis, Daejeon University, Daejeon.
  2. Barbara, H. C., Nancy, O., & Roberta, G. (2012). Concurrent validity of the Bayley-III and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale-2. Pediatric Physical therapy, 24(4), 345-352. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0b013e318267c5cf
  3. Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross Cultural Research, 1(3), 185-216.
  4. Choi, J. H. (2009). Study of validity of Korean version Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-2. Master's thesis, Inje university, Gimhae-si.
  5. Folio, M. R., & Fewell, P. R. (2000). Peabody developmental motor scales(2nd. ed.), Examiner's manual. Austin, TX: PRO-ED, Inc.
  6. Lee, S. H., Hong, C. R., & Park, H. Y. (2018). Current trend in use of occupational therapy assessment tool by pediatric occupational therapist. Journal of Korean Academy of Sensory Integration, 16(3), 23-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.18064/JKASI.2018.16.3.023
  7. Lim, Y. J., Park, K. Y., & Yoo, E. Y. (2007). Pilot study to establish content validity of a Korean-translated version of a sensory profile. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 15(2), 25-42.
  8. Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382-385.
  9. Margo, J. H., Edith, H. C., & Rob, A. O. (2005). Reliability and validity of the fine motor scale of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2. Occupational Therapy International, 12(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.11
  10. Maring, J. R., & Elbaum, L. (2007). Concurrent validity of the early intervention developmental profile and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale-2. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 19(2), 116-120. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0b013e31804a5786
  11. Montgomery, P. C., & Connolly, B. H. (1987). Norm-referenced and criterion-referenced tests: Use in pediatrics and application to task analysis of motor skill. Physical Therapy, 67(12), 1873-1876. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/67.12.1873
  12. Palisano, R. J., Kolobe, T. H., Haley, S. M., Pax Lowes, L., & Jones, S. L. (1995). Validity of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale as an evaluative measure of infants receiving physical therapy. Physical Therapy, 75(11), 939-948. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/75.11.939
  13. Provost, B., Crowe, T. K., & McClain, C. (2000). Concurrent validity of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II motor scale and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales in two-year-old children. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 20(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/J006v20n01_02
  14. Robert, J. P., Thubi, H. K., Stephen, M. H. Linda, P. L., & Sandra, L. J. (1995). Validity of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale as an evaluative measure of infants receiving physical therapy. American Physical Therapy Association, 75(11), 939-948.
  15. Ronald, V. C., Micheal, H., & Erick, M. (2001). Reliability and concurrent validity of the movement assessment battery for children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 93(1), 275-280. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2001.93.1.275
  16. Schmidt, L. S., Westcott, S. L., & Crown, T. K. (1993). Interrater reliability of the gross motor scale of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales with 4-and 5-year-old children. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 5(1), 169-175.
  17. Su, C. T., & Parham, L. D. (2002). Generating a valid questionnaire translation for cross-cultural use. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56(5), 581-585. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.56.5.581
  18. Tecklin, J. S. (2010). Pediatric physical therapy. Seoul, Korea: Yeongmunsa.