Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Relationship between Learning Orientation and Creative Thinking Skill - moderated mediating effect of expertise and motivation -

학습지향성과 창의적 사고능력의 관계에 관한 연구 - 전문지식과 동기의 조절된 매개효과 -

  • Kim, Hyun-Woo (Consulting School, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Song, Chan-Sub (Consulting School, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Lee, Da-Jung (Business School, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Shin, Ho-Kyun (Department of Business Administration, Kumoh National Institute of Technology)
  • 김현우 (금오공과대학교 경영학과) ;
  • 송찬섭 (금오공과대학교 경영학과) ;
  • 이다정 (금오공과대학교 경영학과) ;
  • 신호균 (금오공과대학교 경영학과)
  • Received : 2019.11.01
  • Accepted : 2019.12.20
  • Published : 2019.12.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was to identify the influence of knowledge acquisition on creativity in an organization. We selected the learning orientation among variables related to the acquisition of knowledge and analyzed the moderating effects of motivation in the mediating process of learning orientation, professional knowledge, creative thinking ability, and the relationship between them. To this end, a research model and hypothesis were established through literature studies, and 296 questionnaires were distributed and collected from Daegu and Gyeongbuk to test hypotheses. As a result of the verification through hierarchical regression analysis, it was confirmed that learning orientation has a positive effect on creative thinking skill, and expertise has a mediating effect. And in this mediation relationship, the moderating effect of motivation was confirmed. These findings are suggestive by checking the relationship between the elements in the expression of creativity in detail and identifying the influence of learning orientation. It will be able to provide guidelines for organizational management by explaining the process of creativity through the development of knowledge.

본 연구는 조직에서 지식의 습득이 창의성에 미치는 영향을 확인하고자 하였다. 지식의 습득과 관련된 변수 중 학습지향성을 선정하여 이를 통해 구성원이 창의성을 발현하는 과정에 대해 분석하였다. 구체적으로 학습지향성, 전문지식, 창의적 사고능력의 매개 과정과 이들 간의 관계에서 동기의 조절효과를 실증분석하였다. 이를 위해 문헌연구를 통해 연구모형 및 가설을 설정하였고, 대구·경북에서 제조업 종사자을 대상으로 296부의 설문지를 배포·회수하여 가설을 검증하였다. 계층적 회귀분석을 통한 검증 결과, 학습지향성은 창의적사고능력에 긍정적인 영향을 미치고 전문지식은 매개효과가 있는 것을 확인하였다. 그리고 이러한 매개 관계에서 동기의 조절효과를 확인하였다. 이러한 연구결과는 창의성의 발현에 대해 구성요소의 관계를 보다 상세하게 확인하고, 학습지향성이 미치는 영향에 대해 규명함으로써 시사성이 있다고 할 수 있다. 즉, 지식의 함양을 통해 창의성이 발현되는 과정을 설명함으로써 조직 관리 방안에 가이드라인을 제공할 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Tang, C. & Ye, L. (2015). Diversified knowledge, R&D team centrality and radical creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(1), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12110
  2. Im, S. & Workman Jr, J. P. (2004). Market orientation, creativity, and new product performance in high-technology firms. Journal of Marketing, 68(2), 114-132. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.2.114.27788
  3. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 123-167.
  4. Hogarth, R. M. (1987). Judgement and choice: The psychology of decision.
  5. Getzels, J. W. & Jackson, P. W. (1962). Creativity and intelligence: Explorations with gifted students.
  6. Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40(1), 39-58. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165921
  7. Mumford, M. D. & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.103.1.27
  8. Lee, S. K., Noh, Y. S. & Kang, E. K. (2018). A Study on the effect of Shared Leadership to Innovation Behavior: The moderate effect of Trust. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(4), 69-77. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2018.16.4.069
  9. Cheung, M. F. Y. & Wong, C. S. (2011). Transformational leadership, leader support, and employee creativity. Leadership & Organization Development Journal,. 32(7), 656-672. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437731111169988
  10. Cho, Y. H., Han, B. C., Kim, E. K., Song, C. & Lee, S. K. (2018). A Study on the Moderating Effects of Motivation in Technological Entrepreneurship, Absorption Capacity and Creative Product in the Convergence Era. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(12), 243-256. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2018.16.12.243
  11. Han, B., Cho, Y., Song, C., Kim, E. & Lee, S. (2018). A study of the relationship of Entrepreneurship, Absorptive capacity and Creative product. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(10), 187-197. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2018.16.10.187
  12. Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357
  13. Jang, E. Y., Lee, K. H. & Park, D. J. (2013). The effect of transformational leadership and self-leadership on creativity. Journal of Human Resource Management Research, 20(5), 115-132. https://doi.org/10.14396/jhrmr.2013.20.5.115
  14. Pack, J. W,, & Son, S. Y. (2016). Authentic Leadership and Creativity. Journal of Human Resource Management Research, 23 (4), 15-34. https://doi.org/10.14396/jhrmr.2016.23.4.15
  15. Malik, M. A. R., Butt, A. N. & Choi, J. N. (2015). Rewards and employee creative performance: Moderating effects of creative self‐efficacy, reward importance, and locus of control. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(1), 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1943
  16. Baek, Y, J. & Kim, E. S. (2012). Individual and collective creativity and its relationship with social networks. In Conference of Korean Association of Industrial Business Administration, 111-125.
  17. Lee. S. P, & Kim, S. H. (2016). Psychological Empowerment and Creativity: Mediating Effect of Intrinsic Motivation and Moderating Effect of Trust. Journal of Human Resource Management Research, 23(1), 381-397. https://doi.org/10.14396/jhrmr.2016.23.1.381
  18. Kim, K. H. (2008). Causal Relationship among Learning Orientation, Learning Behavior, Organizational Environment and Learning Outcomes in SMEs, Ph.D., Seoul National University.
  19. Hurley, R. F. & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 42-54. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251742
  20. Baker, W. E. & Sinkula, J. M. (1999). The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(4), 411-427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070399274002
  21. Sinkula, J. M., Baker, W. E. & Noordewier, T. (1997). A framework for market-based organizational learning: Linking values, knowledge, and behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(4), 305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070397254003
  22. DiBella, A. J., Nevis, E. C. & Gould, J. M. (1996). Understanding organizational learning capability. Journal of Management Studies, 33(3), 361-379. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1996.tb00806.x
  23. Calantone, R. J., Cavusgil, S. T. & Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6), 515-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(01)00203-6
  24. Lee, H. B. & Lee, S. C. (2008). A Study on Strengthening of Learning Orientation for Environmental Organizations' Environmental Responsiveness. Korean Organization Science Bulletin, 5(3), 1-27.
  25. S. H. On, K. H. Park & Y. K. Choi. (2011). A Study on the Influence of Learning Organization Level on the Quality Commitment of Employees. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 24(3), 1323-1346.
  26. Khedhaouria, A., Montani, F. & Thurik, R. (2017). Time pressure and team member creativity within R&D projects: The role of learning orientation and knowledge sourcing. International Journal of Project Management, 35(6), 942-954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.002
  27. Gray, P. H. & Meister, D. B. (2004). Knowledge sourcing effectiveness. Management Science, 50(6), 821-834. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0192
  28. Gray, P. H. & Meister, D. B. (2006). Knowledge sourcing methods. Information and Management, 43(2), 142-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.03.002
  29. Valentine, M. A., Staats, B. R. & Edmondson, A. C. (2014). Competing effects of individual and team experience on knowledge sourcing behavior. Harvard Business School.
  30. Kim, H. J. & Seol, H. D. (2014). Mediating Effects of Integrative Capability and Knowledge Sharing on the Relationship between Individual Creativity and Group Creativity. Knowledge Management Research, 15(4), 223-247. https://doi.org/10.15813/kmr.2014.15.4.012
  31. Hang, Y. M. & Lee, K. C. (2016). Investigating the Effect of Social Learning about Entrepreneurship on Creativity. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business and Venturing, 11(5), 165-174.
  32. Cang, J. Y. & Koo, J. S. (1998). The Effects of Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation and Creativity. THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY, 12(2), 39-77.
  33. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J. & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184. https://doi.org/10.2307/256995
  34. VandeWalle, D. (1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57(6), 995-1015. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164497057006009
  35. Kostopoulos, K. C. & Bozionelos, N. (2011). Team exploratory and exploitative learning: Psychological safety, task conflict, and team performance. Group and Organization Management, 36, 385-415. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601111405985
  36. Choi, J. I. (1995). A Study on Determinants of Group Creativity . Ph.D dissertation, Korea University, Seoul.
  37. Kim, H. S. (1999). Development and validation of creativity diagnostic measurement tools. Journal of Educational Psychology, 13(4), 269-303.
  38. Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A. & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The Work Preference Inventory: assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 950. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.66.5.950
  39. Kim. I., Yoo, K. & Kim, Y. (2017). A Study on the Effects of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Activities of Venture Enterprises on the Increase Firms' Revenue. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 8(12), 329-341. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2017.8.12.329
  40. Pyo, H. I. (1999). WHAT STRATEGY AFFECTS TO R&D IN MANUFACTURING SMEs? The Korean small business review, 21(2), 35-62.
  41. Sim, W., Jang, E. & Noh, K. (2019). The Effect of Transformational Leadership's Sub-factors on Innovative Behavior : The Mediating Effect of Job Engagement. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 9(5), 104-116. https://doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2019.9.5.104
  42. Koh, Y. H. & Song, C. S. (2019).. A Study on the Relationship among Corporate entrepreneurship, R&D capacity and Technology commercialization capacity of administrative position - Moderating effect of Technology orientation. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(10), 187-197. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2019.17.10.187
  43. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M. & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego Depletion: Is the Active Self a Limited Resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1252-1265. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1252
  44. Song, C. S., Lee, S. K., Kim, Y. K. & Kang, E. G. (2016). A Study on the influence of Self-Efficacy to Goal Setting in the age of Convergence - Focusing on the Self-regulatory depletion and non-depletion group. Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(3), 151-164. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2016.14.3.151