• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Emotion and Sensibility Conference
• /
• 2009.11a
• /
• pp.123-126
• /
• 2009

본 연구는 만화표현학습을 통한 창의성개발을 목적으로 만화의 창의성 평가요소를 추출하였으며 이를 통하여 실험대상의 창의성을 측정하였다. 먼저 만화의 창의성 요소로 유창성, 융통성, 독창성, 정교성과 더불어 흥미성 요소를 추출하였으며 각 요소를 통하여 객관적인 창의성 평가를 얻기 위해 각 요소에 평가항목을 제시하였다. 이 후 1 차 실험은 실험대상의 4 컷 만화제작을 통해 본 연구에서 제시한 창의성 요소를 이용하여 평가 하였으며 기본적인 창의성 요소를 확인한 결과 수업 전의 창의성이 높은 요소는 유창성, 낮은 요소는 독창성을 들 수 있었다. 또한 1 차 실험 후 실험대상의 작품평가에 대한 창의성 결과에 대해 정교성과 흥미성의 요소를 더욱 개발하기 만화 표현학습이 이루어 졌으며 이후 2 차 실험이 이루어졌다. 2 차 실험 또한 4 컷 만화제작을 통하여 창의성 변화요인을 살펴 보았으며 만화학습 후의 창의성 개발요소 중 높은 요소는 정교성, 낮은 요소는 독창성의 결과가 나타났다. 연구 결과 창의성개발을 위한 본 연구의 만화표현학습이 실험대상의 창의성 변화에 대해 영향을 끼친 사실을 확인할 수 있었다.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles
• /
• v.25 no.9
• /
• pp.1563-1570
• /
• 2001

이 연구의 목적은 중학교 의생활수업에 대한 창의적 문제해결 수업모형 적용에 있어 창의성 증진효과를 검증하는데 있다. 연구는 중학교 1학년 2개 학급의 남·녀 81명의 학생을 대상으로 하였으며, 가정과 의복의 재활용 단원 수업을 실험반과 비교반으로 나누어 동일한 교사에 의해 주당2시간씩 4회 실시하였다 실험반에는 창의적 문제 해결 수업모형이 적용되었으며, 비교반에는 전통적 수업이 적용되었다. 창의성검사는 한국창의성연구소의 창의성 검사지를 사용하였으며, 사전검사와 사후검사가 동일 검사지로 이루어졌다. 자료의 분석은 사전검사에서 두 학급간의 창의성에 의미있는 차이가 나타나, 두 학급간의 창의성의 차검증에서 사전검사의 영향력을 배제하기 위하여 ANCOVA분석을 실시하였다. 분석 결과 창의성의 유창성 , 융통성 , 독창성 세 개의 하위요인 점수와 이를 합산한 전체 창의성 점수에서 모두 창의적 문제해결 수업 모형을 적용한 실험반의 점수가 통계적으로 의미 있게 높은 것으로 나타났다 이러한 결과를 통하여 볼 때 창의적 문제해결 수업모형을 의생활 수업에 적용하였을 때 창의성이 증진된다고 할 수 있으며 , 중학교 뿐 아니라 고등학교 및 초등학교에서의 창의성 증진을 목표로 하는 의생활 수업에도 적용 가능할 것으로 보며 후속 연구의 수행을 제안하는 바이다.

• 한국정보교육학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2010.01a
• /
• pp.89-94
• /
• 2010

본 연구에서는 지식 정보화 사회에 필요한 창의성 신장을 위한 효과적인 교육방법을 모색하는데 목적을 두고 두리틀 교육과 로봇교육을 각각 10차시 분량의 교육과정을 개발하고, 창의성 신장을 위한 창의성 수업모형을 개발하였다. 개발된 교육과정을 창의성 수업 모형에 따라 적용하였다. 또한 창의성 구성요소를 창의적 사고능력, 창의성 성격면으로 나누어 검사하였으며, 창의적 사고능력은 유창성, 융통성, 독창성 면을 측정하였으며, 창의적 성격은 호기심, 민감성, 집착력 면을 측정하였다. 측정 결과 비교반(일반수업) 보다 실험반(두리틀 교육, 로봇교육)의 창의성이 신장되었으며, 두리틀 교육보다 로봇교육이 창의성 신장에 도움이 됨을 알 수 있다. 본 연구를 통해 아동들의 창의성 신장을 위한 효과적인 교육방법을 제안하는데 목적이 있다.

• Journal of Science Education
• /
• v.33 no.1
• /
• pp.31-43
• /
• 2009

The purpose of this study is to identify a domain-specificity of the scientific creativity and the component of scientific creativity. Conducted from theoretical study, this study suggests that a domain-specific view of creativity offers a more useful and constructive components of scientific creativity based on the literature associated with the component of scientific creativity. Scientific creativity has a domain-specific component and so there is need to distinguish scientific creativity from creativity in general. As a result, scientific creativity is different from other creativity it is concerned with scientific knowledge, science process skill, creative scientific problem finding and solving and so on. And since scientific creativity is a kind of ability, it is possible to improve through a scientific creativity program.

• Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea
• /
• v.16 no.1
• /
• pp.39-61
• /
• 2012

Mathematical creativity is essential in school mathematics and mathematics curriculum and ensures the growth of mathematical ability. Therefore mathematics educators try to develop students' creativity via mathematics education for a long time. In special, 2011 revised mathematics curriculum emphasizes mathematical creativity. Yet, it may seem like a vague characterization of mathematical creativity. Furthermore, it is needed to develop the methods for developing the mathematical creativity. So, the goal of this paper is to search for teaching and learning models for developing the mathematical creativity. For this, I discuss about issues of mathematical creativity and extract the factors of mathematical creativity. The factors of mathematical creativity are divided into cognitive factors, affective factors and attitude factors that become the factors of development of mathematical creativity in the mathematical instruction. And I develop 8-teaching and learning models for development of mathematical creativity based on the characters of mathematics and the most recent theories of mathematics education. These models make it crucial for students to develop the mathematical creativity and create the new mathematics in the future.

• School Mathematics
• /
• v.15 no.3
• /
• pp.551-568
• /
• 2013

The purpose of this study is to verify the research trends on 101 articles about mathematical creativity published in domestic journals. The analysis criteria are as follows: (1)What kind of terms the articles use to refer to the creativity in mathematics education, (2)Whether the researchers conceptualize such the terms or not, (3)Whether the definitions are domain-specific or not, (4)What perspectives, categories and levels of the articles have on creativity. The results of this study show the following. First, numerous articles used 'mathematical creativity' in order to point to the creativity in mathematics education. Second, among the 101 selected articles, 60 (59.4%) provided an explicit definition of the mathematical creativity and 19(18.8%) provided an implicit definition. Among the 79 articles, only 43(54.4%) provided domain-specific definitions. Second, the percentage of articles preferring one perspective over the other 3 perspectives were similar. Third, the rate of articles which focused on press(environment) of all categories (person, process, product, press) was low. Fourth, regarding the levels of creativity, most articles were done on little-c creativity level, on the other hand, the articles having an interest in mini-creativity were very rare. Based on these results, necessities of explicit and domestic-specific definition, whole approach of mathematical creativity, and articles focusing on the mini-creativity level should be reported.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.14 no.1
• /
• pp.109-138
• /
• 2011

Recently, the rapid change in the technical environment and under global competition, there has been an increasing attention to the creativity among core competency of organization. Particularly, creativity is an initiative for technological innovations and a primary key factor to the success. Systematic understanding towards creativity is required to derive sophisticated creativity. However, previous researches involved in only one or two elements of creativity made it difficult to understand the holistic relations. Furthermore, the objective measurement tool of creativity is insufficient. Therefore, this study analyzes creativity from each level and clarifies the elements that can coordinately measure that. First, the study suggests three levels that compose creativity. Second, the study not only clarifies the factors influencing creativity from each level but also develops the evaluation index. The creativity level assessment model proposed in the study is capable of providing a guide-line that evaluates, and therefore enhance, the organization's competencies and potentials of creativity.

• Journal of Gifted/Talented Education
• /
• v.22 no.2
• /
• pp.333-352
• /
• 2012

Creativity has been suggested as a prime educational objective by national curriculum of Korea and research on creativity education has been increased since 2000s. How the researcher conceptualizes and approaches creativity affects the research. The purpose of this study is to explore directions of creativity research in education by analyzing its approach based on its categories and levels of creativity. The results of the study shows the following: (1)studies with a definition of creativity are more than without it but the former has been decreasing and the latter increasing little by little. (2)Studies which focus on person, cognitive or emotional characteristics, are the most. And process, environment, and product follow. (3)Regarding the levels of creativity, most was done on little-c creativity level, on the other hand, very limited studies conceptualized the creativity in educational context. Studies having an interest in mini-c creativity level were hardly found.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.42 no.5
• /
• pp.515-524
• /
• 2022

In this study, the relationship between the perception of 'scientific creativity' and 'scientific creativity education' of pre-service elementary school teachers was explored, focusing on the creativity within and between the framework. Within-frame creativity is divided into theoretical creativity and experimental creativity that operate within the paradigm, and between-frame creativity refers to theoretical creativity that brings about paradigm shift. Data collection was conducted through in-depth interviews, and the analysis was performed based on the categories within and between the frames. As a result, pre-service elementary school teachers mainly understood scientific creativity as the scientific creativity within a frame. And they consider scientific creativity in various ways in experimental and theoretical creativity aspects within a frame. On the other hand, they thought that scientific creativity education was possible in terms of experimental creativity within a frame. Based on the results of this study, we would like to discuss the attributes of scientific creativity that can be considered in science education and its educational direction.

• Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea
• /
• v.16 no.2
• /
• pp.253-267
• /
• 2012

In this paper, we primarily focus on the perspectives about creative process, which is how mathematical creativity emerged, as one aspect of mathematical creativity and then present a desirable task characteristic to measure and program characteristics to develop mathematical creativity. At first, we describe domain-generality perspective and domain-specificity perspective on creativity. The former regard divergent thinking skill as a key cognitive process embedded in creativity of various discipline domain involving language, science, mathematics, art and so on. In contrast the researchers supporting later perspective insist that the mechanism of creativity is different in each discipline. We understand that the issue on this two perspective effect on task and program to foster and measure creativity in mathematics education beyond theoretical discussion. And then, based on previous theoretical review, we draw a desirable characteristic on instruction program and task to facilitate and test mathematical creativity, and present an applicable task and instruction cases based on Geneplor model at the mathematics class in elementary school. In conclusion, divergent thinking is necessary but sufficient to develop mathematical creativity and need to consider various mathematical reasoning such as generalization, ion and mathematical knowledge.