DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Consideration of Vertical Position for predictable posterior implant - Deep implantation for Implant Biologic width

예지성 있는 구치부 임플란트를 위한 임플란트의 수직적 깊이에 대한 고려 Implant Biologic width를 위한 Deep Implantation

  • Received : 2019.04.06
  • Accepted : 2019.05.24
  • Published : 2019.06.12

Abstract

For predictable posterior implants, appropriate soft tissue thickness, called the biologic width, is required around the implant for crestal bone stability. In order to do so, it seems that there are many cases where the implant should be positioned deeper than the depth that we previously thought was appropriate or inevitable limit. I would like to share my clinical experience about the vertical position of the posterior implant with the case reports and the related surgical technique.

예지성 있는 대구치부 임플란트을 위해서는 Crestal bone Stabliity를 위해 임플란트 주위에 biologic width라 할 수 있는 적절한 두께의 연조직이 필요하다. 그러기 위해선 기존에 우리가 적절하다고 혹은 어쩔 수 없는 한계라고 생각했던 깊이보다 좀 더 치조골 하방으로 깊이 심어야 하는 경우가 많은 것 같다. 이번 투고에서는 case report와 함께 관련된 surgical technique에 대해서 소개하면서 구치부 임플란트의 수직적 위치에 대해서 생각보고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC, et al. Optimizing Esthetics for Implant Restorations in the Anterior Maxilla: Anatomic and Surgical Considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18: 48999.
  2. Buser D, Chappuis V, Belser SC, Chen S. Implant placement post extraction in esthetic single tooth sites: When immediate, when early, when late? Periodontology 2000;73:84-102
  3. Tomasi, C., Tessarolo, F., Caola, I., Wennstrom,J., Nollo, G. & Berglundh, T. (2013) Morpho-genesis of periimplant mucosa revisited: anexperimental study in humans. Clinical Oral Implants Research. doi:10.1111/clr.12223.
  4. Linkevicius T, Puisys A, Linkeviciene L, Peciuliene V, Schlee M. Crestal bone stability around implants with horizontally matching connection after soft tissue thickening: a prospective clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17:497-508.85. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12155
  5. Shah R, Sowmya NK, Mehta DS. Prevalence of gingival biotype and its relationship to clinical parameters. Contemp Clin Dent. 2015;6(Suppl 1):S167-71
  6. Linkevicius T, Puisys A, Steigmann M, Vindasiute E, Linkeviciene L. Influence of vertical soft tissue thickness on crestal bone changes around implants with platform switching: a comparative clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17:1228-1236. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12222
  7. Renvert S, Polyzois I. Risk indicators for peri-implant mucositis: a systematic literature review. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42:S172-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12346
  8. Galindo-Moreno P., León-Cano A., Ortega-Oller I., Monje A., O'Valle F., Catena A. Marginal bone loss as success criterion in implant dentistry: Beyond 2 mm. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2015;26:e28-e34. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12324
  9. Vervaeke S., Dierens M., Besseler J., De Bruyn H. The influence of initial soft tissue thickness on peri-implant bone remodeling. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2014;16:238-247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00474.x
  10. Spinato S., Stacchi C., Lombardi T., Bernardello F., Messina M., Zaffe D. Biological width establishment around dental implants is influenced by abutment height irrespective of vertical mucosal thickness: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2019;30:649-659 https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13450
  11. T Lombardi, F Berton, S Salgarello et al. Factors Influencing Early Marginal Bone Loss around Dental Implants Positioned Subcrestally: A Multicenter Prospective Clinical Study. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 1168 https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8081168
  12. A Pico, P Martín‐Lancharro, L Caneiro et al. Influence of abutment height and implant depth position on interproximal peri‐implant bone in sites with thin mucosa: A 1‐year randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2019;00:1-8.
  13. Puisys A, Vindasiute E, Linkeviciene L, Linkevicius T. The use of acellular dermal matrix membrane for vertical soft tissue augmentation during submerged implant placement: a case series. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 26(4) 465-470 https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12401
  14. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR: The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.
  15. Ravida A, Barootchi S, Askar H, Suarez-Lopez Del Amo F, Tavelli L, Wang HL. Long-term effectivess of extrashort ($\leq$ 6 mm) dental implants: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 Jan/Feb;34(1):68-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.6893.