International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering

The Society of Naval Architects of Korea (대한조선학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

SCP-Matrix based shipyard APS design: Application to long-term production plan

  • Nam, SeungHoon (Department of Naval Architecture & Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Shen, HuiQiang (Department of Naval Architecture & Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Ryu, Cheolho (Department of Naval Architecture & Ocean Engineering, Inha Technical College) ;
  • Shin, Jong Gye (Department of Naval Architecture & Ocean Engineering and Research Institute of Marine System Engineering, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2017.08.30
  • Accepted : 2017.10.10
  • Published : 2018.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A shipyard is an Engineer To Order (ETO) company that designs and manufactures new products when orders are placed. Various tasks are concurrently performed, thereby making process management considerably important. It is particularly important to plan and control production activities because production constitutes the largest part of the overall process. Therefore, this study focuses on the development of a production planning system based on an Advanced Planning System (APS). An APS is an integrated planning system that targets supply chain processes in accordance with the principles of hierarchical planning. In this study, a Supply Chain Planning Matrix (SCP-Matrix), which is used as a guideline for APS development, is designed through analysis of shipyard cases. Then, we define the process in detail, starting from long-term production plan as the initial application, and design and implement a long-term production planning system using a component-based development.

Keywords

References

  1. Adrodegari, F., Bacchetti, A., Pinto, R., Pirola, F., Zanardini, M., 2015. Engineer-to-Order (ETO) production planning and control: an empirical framework for machinery-building companies. Prod. Plan. Control 26 (11), 910-932. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2014.1001808
  2. Back, M.G., Lee, D.K., Shin, J.G., Woo, J.H., 2016. A study for production simulation model generation system based on data model at a shipyard. Int. J. Nav. Archit. Ocean. Eng. 8 (5), 496-510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2016.05.005
  3. Cho, K.K., Oh, J.S., Ryu, K.R., Choi, H.R., 1998. An integrated process planning and scheduling system for block assembly in shipbuilding. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 47 (1), 419-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62865-0
  4. Choi, H.S., Park, K.H., 1997. Shop-floor scheduling at shipbuilding yards using the multiple intelligent agent system. J. Intell. Manuf. 8 (6), 505-515. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018578820621
  5. Ennis, K.J., Dougherty, J.J., Lamb, T., Greenwell, C.R., Zimmermann, R., 1998. Product-oriented design and construction cost model. J. Ship Prod. 14 (1), 41-58.
  6. Fast, K.R., 2000. Development of a Shipbuilding Simulation Process Modeling Database. National Shipbuilding Research Program: DTIC Document.
  7. Fleischer, M., Kohler, R., Lamb, T., Bongiorni, H.B., 1999. Marine supply chain management. J. Ship Prod. 15 (4), 233-252.
  8. Fleischmann, B., Meyr, H., 2003. Planning hierarchy, modeling and advanced planning systems. Handb. Oper. Res. Manag. Sci. 11, 455-523.
  9. Fleischmann, B., Meyr, H., Wagner, M., 2008. Advanced planning. In: Stadtler, H., Kilger, C., Meyr, H. (Eds.), Supply chain Management and Advanced Planning. Springer, Germany, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 81-106.
  10. Gosling, J., Naim, M.M., 2009. Engineer-to-order supply chain management: a literature review and research agenda. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 122 (2), 741-754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.07.002
  11. Gosling, J., Towill, D.R., Naim, M.M., Dainty, A.R., 2015. Principles for the design and operation of engineer-to-order supply chains in the construction sector. Prod. Plan. Control 26 (3), 203-218.
  12. Hicks, C., McGovern, T., Earl, C.F., 2000. Supply chain management: a strategic issue in engineer to order manufacturing. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 65 (2), 179-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(99)00026-2
  13. Kallestrup, K.B., Lynge, L.H., Akkerman, R., Oddsdottir, T.A., 2014. Decision support in hierarchical planning systems: the case of procurement planning in oil refining industries. Decis. Support Syst. 68, 49-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2014.09.003
  14. Koenig, P.C., MacDonald, P., Lamb, T., Dougherty, J., 1997. Towards a Generic Product-oriented Work Breakdown Structure for Shipbuilding. The Society of Nav. Architects and Marine Engineers.
  15. Kim, H., Lee, J.K., Park, J.H., Park, B.J., Jang, D.S., 2002. Applying digital manufacturing technology to ship production and the maritime environment. Integr. Manuf. Syst. 13 (5), 295-305. https://doi.org/10.1108/09576060210429748
  16. Lee, J.K., Lee, K.J., Hong, J.S., Kim, W., Kim, E.Y., Choi, S.Y., Kim, H.D., Yang, O.R., Choi, H.R., 1995. DAS: intelligent scheduling systems for shipbuilding. AI Mag. 16 (4), 78-94.
  17. Meyr, H., Wagner, M., Rohde, J., 2008. Structure of advanced planning systems. In: Stadtler, H., Kilger, C., Meyr, H. (Eds.), Supply chain Management and Advanced Planning. Springer, Germany, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 109-115.
  18. Mello, M.H., Strandhagen, J.O., 2011. Supply chain management in the shipbuilding industry: challenges and perspectives. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part M J. Eng. Marit. Environ. 225 (3), 261-270. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475090211406836
  19. Okayama, Y., Chirillo, L.D., 1980. ProductWork Breakdown Structure (No. NSRP-SPC-SP-2). MARITIME ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON DC.
  20. Olhager, J., 2010. The role of the customer order decoupling point in production and supply chain management. Comput. Ind. 61 (9), 863-868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2010.07.011
  21. Park, K., Lee, K., Park, S., Kim, S., 1996. Modeling and solving the spatial block scheduling problem in a shipbuilding company. Comput. Ind. Eng. 30 (3), 357-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-8352(96)00004-6
  22. Rahman Abdul Rahim, A., Shariff Nabi Baksh, M., 2003. The need for a new product development framework for engineer-to-order products. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 6 (3), 182-196. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060310486253
  23. Rudberg, M., Thulin, J., 2009. Centralised supply chain master planning employing advanced planning systems. Prod. Plan. Control 20 (2), 158-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537280802705047
  24. Sanderson, J., Cox, A., 2008. The challenges of supply strategy selection in a project environment: evidence from UK naval shipbuilding. Supply Chain Manag. An Int. J. 13 (1), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540810850283
  25. Sarder, M.B., Ali, A., Ferreira, S., Rahman, M.A., 2010. Managing material flow at the US shipbuilding industry. In: International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
  26. Shin, J.G., Lee, K.K., Woo, J.H., Kim, W.D., Lee, J.H., Kim, S.H., Park, J.Y., Yim, H., 2004. A modeling and simulation of production process in subassembly lines at a shipyard. J. Ship Prod. 20 (2), 79-83.
  27. Sommerville, I., 2010. Software Engineering, ninth ed. Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts.
  28. Song, Y.J., Woo, J.H., Shin, J.G., 2009. Research on a simulation-based ship production support system for middle-sized shipbuilding companies. Int. J. Nav. Archit. Ocean. Eng. 1 (2), 70-77. https://doi.org/10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0009
  29. Sriram, P.K., Alfnes, E., Arica, E., 2012. A concept for project manufacturing planning and control for engineer-to-order companies. In: IFIP International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 699-706.
  30. Stadtler, H., Kilger, C., 2008. Supply chain Management and Advanced Planning, fourth ed. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.
  31. Staeblein, T., Aoki, K., 2015. Planning and scheduling in the automotive industry: a comparison of industrial practice at German and Japanese makers. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 162, 258-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.07.005
  32. Vidoni, M.C., Vecchietti, A.R., 2015. A systemic approach to define and characterize Advanced Planning Systems (APS). Comput. Ind. Eng. 90, 326-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.10.006
  33. Vlachakis, N., Mihiotis, A., Pappis, C.P., Lagoudis, I.N., 2016. A methodology for analyzing shipyard supply chains and supplier selection. Benchmarking Int. J. 23 (2), 443-455. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-08-2013-0082
  34. Whitehead, K., 2002. Component-based Development: Principles and Planning for Business Systems. Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts.
  35. Woo, J.H., Song, Y.J., Kang, Y.W., Shin, J.G., 2010. Development of the decision-making system for the ship block logistics based on the simulation. J. Ship Prod. Des. 26 (4), 290-300.
  36. Woo, J.H., Song, Y.J., 2014. Systematisation of ship production management and case study for ship block assembly factory. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 27 (4), 333-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2013.800237
  37. Zoryk-Schalla, A.J., Fransoo, J.C., de Kok, T.G., 2004. Modeling the planning process in advanced planning systems. Inf. Manag. 42 (1), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.06.005

Cited by

  1. System development for establishing shipyard mid-term production plans using backward process-centric simulation vol.12, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2019.05.005
  2. Simulation-based planning system for shipbuilding vol.33, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192x.2020.1775304
  3. A decade of engineering-to-order (2010–2020): Progress and emerging themes vol.241, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108274