융합정보논문지 (Journal of Convergence for Information Technology)

중소기업융합학회 (Convergence Society for SMB)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

대학·연구기관 보유기술 직접사업화 지원사업의 수요분석을 통한 지원정책 효율성 개선 방안

A Study on the Improvement of the Supporting Policy Efficiendy through the Analysis of the Demand for Direct Commercialization of Technology in Universities and Research Institutes

  • 조성남 (한국과학기술정보연구원 학술정보공유센터) ;
  • 정윤수 (목원대학교 정보통신융합공학부) ;
  • 오충식 (한국과학기술정보연구원 과학기술사이버안전센터)
  • Cho, Sung-Nam (Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information) ;
  • Jeong, Yoon-Su (Dept. of information Communication Convergence Engineering, Mokwon University) ;
  • Oh, Chung-Shick (Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information)
  • 투고 : 2018.09.11
  • 심사 : 2018.10.20
  • 발행 : 2018.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

과거 기술사업화는 학계 및 연구계 중심으로 기술이전 또는 창업지원 등 좁은 의미로 해석되어 시행되었으며, 기술 사업화 단계에서 사업의 경험부족, 기술개발 실패, 판로 미확보 등이 실패원인으로 지적되어 왔다. 본 논문에서는 학계 연구소 보유기술의 직접사업화 지원 사업이 공공 자금 및 대기업 영업력을 기반으로, 사업화 기술과 자본, 판로, 정부정책 및 지원 등이 결합한 신개념의 기술사업화 모델을 제시하고, 보유기술을 직접사업화하기 위한 애로요인을 도출하였으며, 조사 및 분석을 통해 기술사업화 수행 주체의 요구요인과 보유역량과의 사이에 차이가 있고, 요구요인과 애로요인간에 상관관계가 있다는 유의미한 결론에 도달하였다. 이 결론을 기반으로, 대학 및 연구기관 보유기술에 대한 사업화의 효율성을 높이기 위한 일환으로 지원정책 개선 방안을 도출하였다.

In the past, technology commercialization was implemented in a narrow sense, such as technology transfer or start-up support. It has been pointed out that lack of entrepreneurial experience, failure in technology development, and insecure markets lead to failure of technology commercialization. The project supporting direct commercialization of technologies owned by academic and research institutes conjoins public funds and operating power of large enterprises to introduce a new technology commercialization model that combines commercialization technology with capital, market, and government policies. And pain points for direct commercializing technology was derived. Through research and analysis, a gap was found between the demand factors and the capability of the actors performing the technology commercialization, and it showed a significant correlation with the paint points. In consequence, measures were drawn to improve support policies to enhance the efficiency of commercialization of technologies held by universities and research institutes.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. OECD. (2012). Main Science and Technology Indicators. OECD Science, Technology and R&D Statistics.
  2. OECD. (2014). Main Science and Technology Indicators. OECD Science, Technology and R&D Statistics.
  3. WIPO. (2010). World Intellectual Property Indicator.
  4. The Innopolis Foundation. (2010). Daedeok Technology Commercialization Technical Commercialization Achievement Briefing Sourcebook.
  5. C. H. Song & H. D. Kim. (1988). A Study on the Direction of Reform in Licensing Policy of Government R&D Outputs to Promote Academic Technology Transfer. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 11(1), 1-22.
  6. Y. D. Lee. (2002). Strategy & Institution of Technology Commercialization.
  7. B. H. Lee, J. G. Choi, J. S. Kim, S. Y. Lee, Y. H. No & J. Y. Hong. (2013). Study on Unmet needs for direct commercialization of technology. Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference.
  8. J. G. Choi, B. H. Lee, J. S. Kim, S. M. Jeong & J. Y. Hong. (2013). A Performance and Policy Improvement Methods of Direct Commercialization Support Business for Technologies of University and Research Instiutes. The 2013 Spring Conference of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship.
  9. J. S. Kyung & B. H. Lee. (2010). A Study of Business Support Policy for Small-Medium Enterprises in Regional Strategic Industry. Journal of the Korea Academia Industrial Cooperation Society, 11(6), 2030-2037 https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2010.11.6.2030
  10. Large & Small Business Cooperation Foundation. (2012). Commercializatin of technology development project for pre-planning for new budget business research report.
  11. Large & Small Business Cooperation Foundation. (2012). Research services on co-investment by companies and government for Technology Development Project to development of performance indicators and analysis of performance.
  12. Large & Small Business Cooperation Foundation. (2013). Study on commercialization of universities, research institutions directly support business retentio nand analysis of technology and promoting sustainable commercialization.
  13. W. V. Chesbrough. (2006), Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Oxford : Oxford University Press
  14. O. Gassmann & E. Enkel. (2004). Towards a Theory of Open Innovation : Three Core Process Archetypes. R&D Management Conference(RADMA). (pp. 1-18).