Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management (품질경영학회지)

Korean Society for Quality Management (한국품질경영학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on the quantitative risk grade assessment of initial mass production for weapon systems

초도양산 군수품에 대한 정량적 위험등급평가 방안 연구

  • Received : 2018.08.10
  • Accepted : 2018.09.11
  • Published : 2018.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to study quantitative risk grade assessment for objective government quality assurance activities based on risk management in initial mass production for weapon systems. Methods: The Defense quality management regulations and foreign risk assessment documents are referred to analyze problems performing quality assurance actives. The failure rate data, maintainability and cost of products have been studied to quantify the risk Likelihood and impact. The analyzed data were classified as risk grade assessment through K-means Cluster Analysis method. Results: Results show that a proposed method can objectively evaluate risk grade. The analyzed results are clustered into three levels such as high, middle and low. Two products are allocated high, eleven low and seven middle. Conclusion: In this paper, quantitative risk grade assessment methods were presented by analyzing risk ratings based on objective data. The findings showed that the methods would be effective for initial mass production for weapon systems.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, N.M. 2015. "Suggestion for Enhancement of Product Examination Government Quality Assurance Activity." J Korean Soc Qual Manag 43(3):327-340. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2015.43.3.327
  2. Beak, Y.G., Kang, B.S., and Jo, K.J. 2015. "An Objective method of risk assessment based on RAM analysis for warship." J Korean Soc Qual Manag 43(4):273-288. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2015.43.3.273
  3. DAPA Instruction. 2014. MRA Instruction. 218.
  4. Defense Agency for Technology and Quality(DTAQ). 2017. Defense Quality Management Regulations.
  5. Department of defense. Defense Acquisition University. 2003. Risk Management guide for DOD Acquisition. Fifth Edition(ver 2.0).
  6. Ebeling, C. E. 1997. "An Introduction to Reliability and Maintainability Engineering." McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Boston.
  7. Emre, Celebi., Hassan, A., Kingravi Patricio A. Vela. 2013. "A comparative study of efficient initialization methods for the k-means clustering algorithm." Expert Systems with Applications 40(2013):200-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.07.021
  8. Erioli, Andrea 2005. "K-means Cluster Analysis and Mahalanobis Metrics: a problematic match or an overlooked opportunity." Statistica Applicata 17:61-73.
  9. Finkelstein, Maxim, 2008. Introduction Failure Rate Modelling for Reliability and Risk. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, 1-84.
  10. ISO 31000. 2018. Risk Management Principles and Guidelines.
  11. Kim, Y.S., and Choi, H.S. 2010. "Introduction to Defense Quality Management." Hyungseul: 101-116.
  12. Lee, C.H., and Yang, K.W. 2014. "A Study on the Risk Identification Methods for Initial and Mass Production Stage of Military Products Using FMEA." J Korean Soc Qual Manag 42(3):311-324. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2014.42.3.311
  13. Lee, G.H. 1997. "A Study on Clustering Methods." Mokpho University:10-23.
  14. Lee, J. H., Jung, Y. T. 2017. "A Study on the Methodology of Manufacturing Readiness Levels(MRLs) 8 of Manufacturing Readiness Assessment(MRA)." J Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society 18(6):609-619. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2017.18.1.609
  15. MIL-STD-882D. 2000. Risk Management Guide for DoD Acquisition.
  16. Seo, M.K., Yun, W. Y. 2017. "Clustering-based Monitoring and Fault detection in Hot Strip Roughing Mill." J Korean Soc Qual Manag. 45(1):25-38. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2017.45.1.025
  17. Seo, M.Y., Yun, W.Y. 2017. "Clustering-based Monitoring and Fault detection in Hot Strip Roughing Mill." J Korean Soc Qual Manag 45(1):025-038. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2017.45.1.025
  18. Shin, S.S., and Lee, K.S., Cho, H.G. 2013. "An Objective Method of Risk Assessment Based on Stochastic Modelling." J Korean Soc Qual Manag 41(3):465-474. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2013.41.3.465
  19. U.S. Department of Defense. 1998. MIL-HDBK-338B. Reliability Modeling and Prediction : Electronic Reliability Design Handbook.
  20. Yoo, H.S., Kim. H.W., Sakong, C.D. 2017. "RAM analysis Report on ADC2A". ADD, ADC2A-RAMR V5.0.
  21. Yoon, J.B., Ryu, S.H. 2016. "A Study on systematic performance of risk identification, risk assessment and risk treatment." DTAQ Technical Report:12-26.