여성건강간호학회지 (Women's Health Nursing)

  • 제24권3호
  • /
  • Pages.297-309
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 3022-7666(pISSN)
  • /
  • 3022-8247(eISSN)
한국여성건강간호학회 (Korean Society of Women Health Nursing)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

임신 위험 증상 지각 측정도구 개발

Development of Pregnancy Risk Symptom Perception Scale

  • Kim, Mi Heyi (Department of Nursing, Cheongam College) ;
  • Choi, So Young (College of Nursing, Institute of Health Science, Gyeongsang National University)
  • 투고 : 2018.08.02
  • 심사 : 2018.09.05
  • 발행 : 2018.09.20
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: To develop Pregnancy Risk symptom Perception Scale (PRPS) and evaluate its validity and reliability. Methods: A preliminary 30-item version of PRPS was developed through literature review, in-depth interview, and Content Validity. Each item was scored on a four-point Likert scale. The preliminary scale was developed based on 301 pregnant women who visited a hospital. Date were analyzed using item analysis, factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, Pearson's correlation coefficients, and Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ (0.90 for total item, 0.80 to 0.88 for factors). Results: The PRPS consisted of 27 items. Three factors (physical, environmental, and emotional factors) explained 55% of the total variance. Cronbach's Criterion validity was supported by comparison with the Perception of Pregnancy Risk Questionnaire (r=0.34). In reliability test, the reliability coefficient of pregnancy risk symptom perception was high at 0.90. Conclusion: These results suggest that the pregnancy risk symptom perception scale developed in this study comprises items that can assess the level of pregnant women's pregnancy risk symptom perception in Korea. Its validity and reliability were proven. PRPS can be utilized to measure pregnant women's risk symptom perception during pregnancy. PRPS will contribute to the development of systematic prenatal care and effective risk management.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Whang RI, Kim GH, Youn JW, Lee JS. The trend of national health insurance service use among pregnant and postpartum women aged 35 years and older. Korean Journal of Health Policy & Administration. 2011;21(4):585-598. https://doi.org/10.4332/KJHPA.2011.21.4.585
  2. Choi JH, Han HJ, Hwang JH, Jeong SR, Mun HY, Park MI, et al. Meta analysis of clinical studies of pregnancy and delivery in elderly gravida. The Korean Association of Obstetricians and Gynecology. 2006;49(2):293-308.
  3. Lee SS, Kim DH, Kim TH. Fertility differentials by demographic and socioeconomic characteristic: Analysis of Korean population census data. Korea Journal of Population Studies. 2006;29(1):1-23.
  4. National Statistical Office. Birth Statistics 2016 [Internet]. Seoul: Statistics Korea; 2017 [cited 2017 August 29]. Available from: http://www.kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_nw/2/1/index.board?bmode=read&aSeq=362574
  5. Lee JY, Choi US. Stress and coping style of high-risk pregnant women's spouses. Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing. 2010;16(3):234-244. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2010.16.3.234
  6. Kim SM, Kim DS. The effect of parental socioeconomic position on the association between birth outcomes and infant mortality in Korea: Focusing on early and late 2000's. Korea Journal of Population Studies. 2012;35(1):131-149.
  7. Salem YS, Levy A, Wiznitzer A, Holcberg G, Mazor M, Sheiner E. A significant linear association exists between advanced maternal age and adverse perinatal outcome. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2011;283(4):755-759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1459-4
  8. Kim TE, Lee SP, Park JM, Whang BC, Kim SY. The effects of maternal age on outcome of pregnancy in healthy elderly primipara. Korean Journal of Perinatology. 2009;20(2):146-152.
  9. Carolan MC. Towards understanding the concept of risk for pregnant women: Some nursing and midwifery implications. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2009;18(5):652-658. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02480.x
  10. Richter MS, Parkes C, Chaw-Kant J. Listening to the voices of hospitalized high-risk antepartum patient. Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing. 2007;36(4):313-318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.2007.00159.x
  11. Bayrampour H, Heaman M, Duncan KA, Tough S. Comparison of perception of pregnancy risk of nulliparous women of advanced maternal age and younger age. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health. 2012;57(5):445-453. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-2011.2012.00188.x
  12. Heaman M, Gupton A, Gregory D. Factors influencing pregnant women's perceptions of risk. The American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing. 2004;29(2):111-116. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005721-200403000-00010
  13. Lee S, Ayers S, Holden D. Risk perception of women during high risk pregnancy: A systematic review. Health, Risk & Society. 2012;14(6):511-531. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2012.701277
  14. Kim MH, Choi SY. The comparative study for pregnancy stress, anxiety and birth outcomes of pregnant women under 35 years old and over 35 years old. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society. 2014;16(4):2177-2190.
  15. Heaman MI, Gupton AL. Psychometric testing of the perception of pregnancy risk questionnaire. Research in Nursing & Health. 2009;32(5):493-503. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20342
  16. National Korean Language Institute. 2012 standard Korean dictionary [Internet]. Seoul: Author; 2017 [cited 2017 September 1]. Available from: http://stdweb2.korean.go.kr/search/List_dic.jsd
  17. Lee YJ. Development of workplace bullying in nursing-consequence inventory (WPBN-CI). Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society. 2016;17(2):479-488. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2016.17.2.479
  18. Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research. 1986;35(6):382-385.
  19. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 4th ed. New York: Allyn and bacon; 2000. 966 p.
  20. Seo UH. Statistical analysis using SPSS 18.0. Seoul: freedom academy; 2010. 434 p.
  21. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. 4th ed. Oxfordshire county: Oxford university press; 2009. p. 25-39.
  22. Heo S, Kim GH. Development and evaluation of job stress measurement tool for infection control nurse. Korean Academy of Nursing Administration. 2013;19(5):622-635. https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2013.19.5.622
  23. Choi HJ. Study on the development of cultural competency scale for social workers. Academy of Korean Social Welfare Administration. 2014;16(2):55-91.
  24. Choi JS. Pregnancy risk assessment mornitoring system. Health and Welfare Policy. 2012;19:61-69.
  25. Bae BY. Structural equation modeling with amos 19-principles and practices. Seoul: Chungram; 2011. p. 229-239.
  26. Joe YR, Kim JH. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Korean version of the Beck depression inventory: Testing configural and metric invariance across undergraduate and clinical samples. Korean Journal of Psychology. 2002;21(4):843-857.
  27. Sun TJ, Si GJ. Rearch methodology. Seoul: Hakjisa; 2007. p. 163-211.
  28. Lee GH, Shin SJ. Validity of instrument development research in Korean nursing research. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2013;43(6):697-703. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2013.43.6.697