Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management (한국건설관리학회논문집)

Korea Institute of Construction Engineering and Management (한국건설관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Handover Requirements of Construction Information for Efficient Facility Management

효율적인 자산관리를 위한 건설정보 이양요건 평가

  • Received : 2018.03.23
  • Accepted : 2018.06.07
  • Published : 2018.07.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

As facilities have become larger, more complex, and advanced, the importance of the facility management in the operation phase of the building is increasing. As a result, the scope of the facility management function is expanding, and the requirements of information are ever-increasing. However, inefficient exchange of information occurs due to duplicated tasks and lack of collaboration among the construction life cycle phases, resulting in cost loss. These low interoperability issues can be complemented by construction information management from a life cycle perspective. Efficient construction information management at each life-cycle stage is derived from the owner's will and is materialized through the construction information handover requirements by the owner. The purpose of this study is to develop an evaluation method of construction information handover requirements for facility management. In order to develop the method, facility management types and business functions are also classified and defined in this paper. Using the methodology proposed by this study, a case-study of evaluating the 'takeover items' submitted by contractors was performed for the purpose of research validation. The results of the case-study found that the most effective areas are in the order of 'legal informations', 'drawings', 'guides', etc. This study can be used as a reference data for deriving handover requirements for construction information at the early stage of the project.

최근 시설이 대형화, 복합화, 첨단화됨에 따라 건축물 운영단계에서 수행되는 자산관리 업무의 중요성이 대두되고 있으며, 이에 따라 자산관리 업무의 범위가 확대되고, 요구 정보가 증가하고 있다. 그러나 건설 생애주기 단계 간 업무 중첩, 협업 배제 등으로 인한 비효율적인 정보교환이 이루어지며, 이로 인해 비용 손실이 발생된다. 이러한 생애주기 간 낮은 정보호환성 문제는 전 생애주기 관점의 건설 정보관리를 통해 보완할 수 있다. 각 생애주기 단계 참여자의 건설정보 관리는 발주자의 건설정보 이양요건을 통해 구체화된다. 이에 본 연구는 발주자 관점의 자산관리 개념 정리와 생애주기 간 정보호환성 개선을 목적으로, 자산관리의 유형분류, 자산관리 업무기능, 그리고 건설정보 이양요건 항목의 가치 평가방법론을 제시하였다. 본 연구의 방법론을 이용하여 시공자가 발주자에게 제공하는 '인수인계 항목'을 발주자의 이양요건으로 참조하여 평가하였다. 그 결과 건축물 정보, 도면 등의 순서로 가치 순위가 도출되었다. 본 연구를 통하여 사업 초기단계에서 발주자의 건설정보 이양요건 도출, 그리고 정보이양(Information Handover)의 성과측정을 위한 기초자료로써 활용될 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae, Y. M., Kwahk, K. J., Kim, S. J., and Kim, J. J. (2004). "Development of Web-based Facility Management System by utilizing Information in Construction Phase." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 5(1), pp. 99-106.
  2. Cho, S. G. (2014). "A Study on the Activation of Real Estate Property Management." Master's thesis, Jeonju Univ., Korea.
  3. IFMA (http://www.ifma.org) (Nov, 16, 2017).
  4. Kim, I. H. (2011). "Property operation and facility management." First Edition, Namdubooks, Seoul.
  5. Kim, J. J. (2009). "The Infomalization Strategies for Raising the Productivity of Construction Industry." Review of Architecture and Building Science, the Architectural Institute of Korea, 53(4), pp. 27-30.
  6. Kim, S. R., Jin, R. Z., Hyun, C. T., and Cho, C. G. (2013). "Development of Operation & Maintenance Cost Estimating Model for Facility Management of Buildings." Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 29(1), pp. 11-21.
  7. Lee, H. I. (2017). Main features of the paradigm change in domestic construction market. CERIK Report, 2017-07.
  8. Lee, I. G. (2011). "A Study on Performance Factors of the Facility Management Companies." Doctorate thesis, Sungkyul Univ., Korea.
  9. Lee, I. H., and Jung, Y. S. (2017). "Defining Various Types of Facility Management." Proceedings of KICEM Annual Conference, KICEM, 16, pp. 127-128.
  10. Lee, K. J., and Jung, Y. S. (2016). "Assessment of Facility Management Functions for Life-Cycle Information Sharing." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 11(6), pp. 35-44.
  11. Lee, S. K., Yu, J. H., and An, H. K. (2012). "Improvement of Information Collection System in Design and Construction Phases for Efficient Facility Management." Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 28(5), pp. 33-42.
  12. Liu, R., and Zettersten, G. (2016). "Facility sustainment management system automated population from building information models." Construction Research Congress 2016, pp. 2403-2410.
  13. Newton, R. S. (1995). "Inadequate interoperability in construction wastes 415.8 billion annually." AEC News.com 13, Article 342.
  14. Oh, M. Y., and Park, T. W. (2017). "An Analysis of Effect That the Real Estate Asset Management Service for Large Office Buildings Has on Tenant Member Satisfaction - Focusing on GRAN SEOUL and FKI TOWER." Journal of the Korea Real Estate Analysts Association, 23(1), pp. 49-60.
  15. RICS (2013). "Strategic facilities management 1st edition." RICS guidance note.
  16. Sattenini, A., Azhar, S., and Thuston, J. (2011). "Preparing a building information model for facility maintenance and management." 28th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, Seoul, South Korea, pp. 144-149.
  17. Teicholz E. (2004). "Bridging the AEC/FM technology gap." Journal of Facilities Management, 2, pp. 1-8.
  18. Texas State Auditor's Office (1996). "Accountability Modules: Facility Management", Texas State Auditor's Office Methodology Manual.
  19. William, E. E., Nisbet, N. and Liebich, T. (2013). "Facility Management Handover Model View." Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, ASCE, 27(1), pp. 61-67. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000196
  20. Yoon, Y. S. (2014). "Introduction and Practice of Property Management Office Building." First Edition, booknamu, Seoul.