Structural Monitoring and Maintenance

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Pushover analysis - result borders due to hinge formation orders

  • Kulkarni, Supriya R. (Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Karnataka) ;
  • Narayan, K.S. Babu (Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Karnataka)
  • Received : 2017.07.27
  • Accepted : 2018.02.06
  • Published : 2018.06.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Performance evaluation of RC frame building by nonlinear static pushover analysis that accounts for elastic and post elastic behavior is becoming very popular as a valid decision making tool in seismic hazard resistant designs. Available literature suggests great amount of interest has shown by researchers in suggesting refinements to geometric and material modelling to bridge the gap between analytical predictions and observed performances. Notwithstanding the attempts gaps still exists. Sequence of plastic hinge formation which has great influence on pushover analysis results is an area less investigated. This paper attempts to highlight the importance of hinge sequence considerations to make analysis results more meaningful. Variation in analysis results due to different hinge sequences have been quantified, compared and bounds on analysis results have been presented.

Keywords

References

  1. Bobadilla, H. and Chopra, A.K. (2008), "Evaluation of the MPA procedure for estimating seismic demands: RC-SMRF buildings", Earthq. Spectra, 24(4), 827-845 https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2945295
  2. Bracci, J.M., Reinhorn, A.M. and Mander, J.B. (1995), "Seismic resistance of reinforced concrete frame structures designed for gravity loads: performance of structural system", ACI Struct. J., 92, 597-609.
  3. Chopra, A.K. (2001), "Dynamics of structures, theory and applications to earthquake engineering", Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.
  4. Fajfar, P.A. (2000), "A non-linear analysis method for performance based seismic design", J. Earthq. Spectra., 16, 573-592. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586128
  5. Goel, R.K. and Chopra, A.K. (2009), "Nonlinear analysis of ordinary bridges crossing fault-rupture zones", J. Bridge Eng., 14(3), 216-224. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2009)14:3(216)
  6. Gulkan, P. and Sozen, M.A. (1974), "Inelastic response of reinforced concrete structures to earthquake ground motion", J. Am. Concrete Institute., 71, 601-609.
  7. Inel, M. and Ozmen, H.B. (2006), "Effects of plastic hinge properties in nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete buildings", Eng. Struct., 28, 1494-1502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.01.017
  8. Kalkan, E. and Chopra, A.K. (2011), "Modal-pushover-based ground-motion scaling procedure", J. Struct. Eng.- ASCE, 137(3), 298-310 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000308
  9. Kalkan, E. and Chopra, A.K. (2012), "Evaluation of modal pushover-based sealing of one component of ground motion: Tall buildings", Earthq. Spectra, 28(4), 1469-1493. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000091
  10. Kalkan, E. and Kunnath, S.K. (2004), "Method of modal combinations for pushover analysis of building", Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C.Canada.
  11. Krawinkler, H. and Seneviratana, G.D.P.K. (1998), "Pros and cons of pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation", Eng. Struct., 20(4-6), 452-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00092-8
  12. Kulkarni, R.S., Ravikumara, H.S. and Babu Narayan, K.S. (2017), "Consequence of hinge formation sequence on pushover analysis results", Manipal J. Sci. Technol., 2(1), 41-46.
  13. Mao, J., Zhai, C. and Xie, L. (2008), "An improved modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands of structures", Earthq. Eng. Eng.Vib., 7, 25-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-008-0786-y
  14. Panandikar, N. and Narayan K.S.B. (2014) "Sensitivity of pushover curve to material and geometric modelling- an analytical investigation", Structures, 91-97.
  15. Paspuleti, C. (2002), "Seismic analysis of an older reinforced concrete frame structure", Master Thesis, Engineering University of Washington.
  16. Reyes, J.C. and Chopra, A.K. (2011), "Evaluation of three-dimensional modal pushover analysis for unsymmetric-plan buildings subjected to two components of ground motion", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 40(13), 1475-1494. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1100
  17. Reyes, J.C. and Chopra, A.K. (2011), "Three-dimensional modal pushover analysis of buildings subjected to two components of ground motion, including its evaluation for tall buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 40(7), 789-806. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1060
  18. Reyes, J.C. and Chopra, A.K. (2012), "Modal pushover-based scaling of two components of ground motion records for Nonlinear RHA of Structures", Earthq. Spectra, 28(3), 1243-1267. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000069
  19. Sharma Akanshu., Reddy, G.R. and Eligehausen, R. (2013), "Pushover experiment and analysis of a full scale non-seismically detailed RC structure", Eng. Struct., 46, 218-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.08.006
  20. Shibata, A. and Sozen, M.A. (1976), "Substitute -structure method for seismic design in R/C", J. Struct. Div., 102, 1-18.
  21. Takeda, T., Sozen, M.A. and Neilsoen, N.N. (1970), "Reinforced concrete response to simulated earthquakes", J. Struct. Div., 96(12), 2557-2573.