The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of the marginal fit of milled yttrium stabilized zirconium dioxide crowns obtained by scanning silicone impressions and by scanning stone replicas

  • Yus, Estefania Aranda (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Medicine Doctorate and Translational Research, University of Barcelona) ;
  • Cantarell, Josep Maria Anglada (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Barcelona) ;
  • Alonso, Antonio Minarro (Department of Genetics, Microbiology and Stadistics, Faculty of Biology, University of Barcelona)
  • Received : 2017.09.10
  • Accepted : 2018.02.27
  • Published : 2018.06.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. To determine the discrepancy in monolithic zirconium dioxide crowns made with computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) systems by comparing scans of silicone impressions and of master casts. MATERIALS AND METHODS. From a Cr-Co master die of a first upper left molar, 30 silicone impressions were taken. The 30 silicone impressions were scanned with the laboratory scanner, thus obtaining 30 milled monolithic yttrium stabilized zirconium dioxide (YSZD) crowns (the silicone group). They were poured and the working models were scanned, obtaining 30 milled monolithic yttrium stabilized zirconium dioxide (YSZD) crowns (the plaster group). Three predetermined points were analyzed in each side of the crown (Mesial, Distal, Vestibular and Palatal), and the marginal fit was evaluated with SEM (${\times}600$). The response variable is the discrepancy from the master model. A repeated measures ANOVA with two within subject factors was performed to study significance of main factors and interaction. RESULTS. Mean marginal discrepancy was $22.42{\pm}35.65{\mu}m$ in the silicone group and $8.94{\pm}14.69{\mu}m$ in the plaster group. The statistical analysis showed significant differences between the two groups and also among the four aspects. Interaction was also significant (P=.02). CONCLUSION. The mean marginal fit values of the two groups were within the clinically acceptable values. Significant differences were found between the groups according to the aspects studied. Various factors influenced the accuracy of digitizing, such as the design, the geometry, and the preparation guidance, as well as the texture, roughness and the color of the scanned material.

Keywords

References

  1. Caparroso CB, Marin DV, Echavarria A. Marginal adaptation and internal fit of zirconia-ytrya frameworks fabricated with $Procera^{(R)}$ and Cerec $in-Lab^{(R)}$ CAD/CAM systems. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq 2011;22:186-97.
  2. An S, Kim S, Choi H, Lee JH, Moon HS. Evaluating the marginal fit of zirconia copings with digital impressions with an intraoral digital scanner. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1171-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.12.024
  3. Alghazzawi TF, Al-Samadani KH, Lemons J, Liu PR, Essig ME, Bartolucci AA, Janowski GM. Effect of imaging powder and CAD/CAM stone types on the marginal gap of zirconia crowns. J Am Dent Assoc 2015;146:111-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2014.10.006
  4. Pradíes G, Zarauz C, Valverde A, Ferreiroa A, Martínez-Rus F. Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions based on wavefront sampling technology. J Dent 2015;43:201-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.12.007
  5. Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E, Proeschel P. Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures,generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113: 174-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00197.x
  6. Ting-Shu S, Jian S. Intraoral digital impression technique: A review. J Prosthodont 2015;24:313-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12218
  7. Keul C, Stawarczyk B, Erdelt KJ, Beuer F, Edelhoff D, Guth JF. Fit of 4-unit FDPs made of zirconia and CoCr-alloy after chairside and labside digitalization-a laboratory study. Dent Mater 2014;30:400-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.01.006
  8. Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 2010;38:553-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.03.015
  9. Ng J, Ruse D, Wyatt C. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:555-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.12.002
  10. Flugge TV, Schlager S, Nelson K, Nahles S, Metzger MC. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;144:471-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.017
  11. Lee WS, Kim WC, Kim HY, Kim WT, Kim JH. Evaluation of different approaches for using a laser scanner in digitization of dental impressions. J Adv Prosthodont 2014;6:22-9. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.1.22
  12. Schillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD, et al: Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics. 3rd ed.London: Ed Quintessence Books; 2006 : p. 130- 132.
  13. Renne W, McGill ST, Forshee KV, DeFee MR, Mennito AS. Predicting marginal fit of CAD/CAM crowns based on the presence or absence of common preparation errors. J Prosthet Dent 2012;108:310-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60183-8
  14. Tsitrou EA, Northeast SE, van Noort R. Evaluation of the marginal fit of three margin designs of resin composite crowns using CAD/CAM. J Dent 2007;35:68-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2006.04.008
  15. Rinke S, Fischer C. Range of indications for translucent zirconia modif icat ions: c l in ica l and technica l aspects. Quintessence Int 2013;44:557-66.
  16. Lawrence MA. ez: Easy analysis and visualization of factorial experiments. Computer software manual. (R package version 3.0-0). 2011.
  17. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:405-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90170-4
  18. Persson AS, Odén A, Andersson M, Sandborgh-Englund G. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness. Dent Mater 2009;25: 929-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.01.100
  19. Patzelt SB, Bishti S, Stampf S, Att W. Accuracy of computer- aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data. J Am Dent Assoc 2014;145:1133-40. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.2014.87
  20. Anami LC, Lima JM, Corazza PH, Yamamoto ET, Bottino MA, Borges AL. Finite element analysis of the influence of geometry and design of zirconia crowns on stress distribution. J Prosthodont 2015;24:146-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12175
  21. DeLong R, Knorr S, Anderson GC, Hodges J, Pintado MR. Accuracy of contacts calculated from 3D images of occlusal surfaces. J Dent 2007;35:528-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.02.004
  22. Rudolph H, Luthardt RG, Walter MH. Computer-aided analysis of the influence of digitizing and surfacing on the accuracy in dental CAD/CAM technology. Comput Biol Med 2007; 37:579-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2006.05.006
  23. Persson AS, Andersson M, Oden A, Sandborgh-Englund G. Computer aided analysis of digitized dental stone replicas by dental CAD/CAM technology. Dent Mater 2008;24:1123-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.01.008
  24. Schaefer O, Decker M, Wittstock F, Kuepper H, Guentsch A. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro. J Dent 2014;42:677-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.01.016
  25. Quaas S, Rudolph H, Luthardt RG. Direct mechanical data acquisition of dental impressions for the manufacturing of CAD/CAM restorations. J Dent 2007;35:903-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.08.008
  26. Schaefer O, Kuepper H, Sigusch BW, Thompson GA, Hefti AF, Guentsch A. Three-dimensional fit of lithium disilicate partial crowns in vitro. J Dent 2013;41:271-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.11.014
  27. Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 2010;38:553-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.03.015
  28. DeLong R, Pintado MR, Ko CC, Hodges JS, Douglas WH. Factors influencing optical 3D scanning of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. J Prosthodont 2001;10:78-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2001.00078.x
  29. Seo D, Yi Y, Roh B. The effect of preparation designs on the marginal and internal gaps in Cerec3 partial ceramic crowns. J Dent 2009;37:374-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.01.008
  30. Kim KB, Kim JH, Kim WC, Kim JH. Three-dimensional evaluation of gaps associated with fixed dental prostheses fabricated with new technologies. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112: 1432-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.07.002

Cited by

  1. A Comparative Study of the Fitness and Trueness of a Three-Unit Fixed Dental Prosthesis Fabricated Using Two Digital Workflows vol.9, pp.14, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/app9142778
  2. Fit of tooth‐supported zirconia single crowns—A systematic review of the literature vol.6, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.323
  3. Evaluation of the marginal fit of monolithic crowns fabricated by direct and indirect digitization vol.65, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.jpr_d_20_00003