References
- Perakis N, Belser UC, Magne P. Final impressions: a review of material properties and description of a current technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004;24:109-17.
- Wettstein F, Sailer I, Roos M, Hammerle CH. Clinical study of the internal gaps of zirconia and metal frameworks for fixed partial dentures. Eur J Oral Sci 2008;116:272-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00527.x
- Persson AS, Oden A, Andersson M, Sandborgh-Englund G. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness. Dent Mater 2009;25: 929-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.01.100
- Christensen GJ. The state of fixed prosthodontic impressions: room for improvement. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136: 343-6. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0175
- Christensen GJ. Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. J Am Dent Assoc 2009;140:1301-4. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0054
- Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an over-view of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008;204:505-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.350
- Mehl A, Ender A, Mörmann W, Attin T. Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera. Int J Comput Dent 2009;12:11- 28.
- Fasbinder DJ. Digital dentistry: innovation for restorative treatment. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2010;31:2-11.
- van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 2012;28:3-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.014
- Yau HT, Yang TJ, Lin YK. Comparison of 3-D printing and 5-axis milling for the production of dental emodels from in- tra-oral scanning. CAD App 2016;13:32-8.
- Kasparova M, Grafova L, Dvorak P, Dostalova T, Prochazka A, Eliasova H, Prusa J, Kakawand S. Possibility of reconstruction of dental plaster cast from 3D digital study models. Biomed Eng Online 2013;12:49. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-12-49
- Jeong ID, Lee JJ, Jeon JH, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Accuracy of complete-arch model using an intraoral video scanner: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:755-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.11.007
- Quaas S, Rudolph H, Luthardt RG. Direct mechanical data acquisition of dental impressions for the manufacturing of CAD/CAM restorations. J Dent 2007;35:903-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.08.008
- Koch GK, Gallucci GO, Lee SJ. Accuracy in the digital workflow: From data acquisition to the digitally milled cast. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:749-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.004
- Rhee YK, Huh YH, Cho LR, Park CJ. Comparison of intraoral scanning and conventional impression techniques using 3-dimensional superimposition. J Adv Prosthodont 2015;7: 460-7. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.6.460
- Martins LM, Lorenzoni FC, Melo AO, Silva LM, Oliveira JL, Oliveira PC, Bonfante G. Internal fit of two all-ceramic systems and metal-ceramic crowns. J Appl Oral Sci 2012;20:235- 40. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000200019
- Moldovan O, Luthardt RG, Corcodel N, Rudolph H. Three-dimensional fit of CAD/CAM-made zirconia copings. Dent Mater 2011;27:1273-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.006
- Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wöstmann B. Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:1759-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0864-4
- Moldovan O, Luthardt RG, Corcodel N, Rudolph H. Three-dimensional fit of CAD/CAM-made zirconia copings. Dent Mater 2011;27:1273-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.006
- Joo YH, Lee JH. Three dimensional accuracy analysis of dental stone casts fabricated using irreversible hydrocolloid impressions. J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci 2015;31:316-28. https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2015.31.4.316
- Colpani JT, Borba M, Della Bona A. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of ceramic crown copings. Dent Mater 2013; 29:174-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.10.012
Cited by
- 치과 진료실에서 3D 프린트의 활용 vol.27, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.15522/jkaed.2018.27.2.82
- Polymer-based composites for dental three-dimensional printing applied to drug release: A proposal of an antimicrobial biomaterial vol.9, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4103/2321-8568.266229
- Three-Dimensional Evaluation on Accuracy of Conventional and Milled Gypsum Models and 3D Printed Photopolymer Models vol.12, pp.21, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12213499
- Methods for verification of 3D printed anatomic model accuracy using cardiac models as an example vol.5, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-019-0043-1
- Accuracy of 3D Printed Models Created by Two Technologies of Printers with Different Designs of Model Base vol.29, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13107
- Clinical and laboratory passive fit assessment of implant‐supported zirconia restorations fabricated using conventional and digital workflow vol.22, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12885
- Ceramic Materials and Technologies Applied to Digital Works in Implant-Supported Restorative Dentistry vol.13, pp.8, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13081964
- Impact of Aging on the Accuracy of 3D-Printed Dental Models: An In Vitro Investigation vol.9, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051436
- Incorporating Aminated Nanodiamonds to Improve the Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Resin-Based Biomedical Appliances vol.10, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10050827
- A new dental casting technique for production of void-free dental models vol.54, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20200098
- Accuracy of 3-Dimensionally Printed Full-Arch Dental Models: A Systematic Review vol.9, pp.10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103357
- Assessment of Compatibility between Various Intraoral Scanners and 3D Printers through an Accuracy Analysis of 3D Printed Models vol.13, pp.19, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13194419
- Geometric accuracy of an acrylonitrile butadiene styrene canine tibia model fabricated using fused deposition modelling and the effects of hydrogen peroxide gas plasma sterilisation vol.16, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02691-y
- Comparison between Additive and Subtractive CAD-CAM Technique to Produce Orthognathic Surgical Splints: A Personalized Approach vol.10, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm10040273
- Evaluation of the Color Stability of 3D-Printed Crown and Bridge Materials against Various Sources of Discoloration: An In Vitro Study vol.13, pp.23, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13235359
- Evaluation of the 3D Printing Accuracy of a Dental Model According to Its Internal Structure and Cross-Arch Plate Design: An In Vitro Study vol.13, pp.23, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13235433
- Accuracy evaluation of complete-arch models manufactured by three different 3D printing technologies: a three-dimensional analysis vol.65, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.jpor_2019_579
- A Review of 3D Printing in Dentistry: Technologies, Affecting Factors, and Applications vol.2021, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9950131
- Dimensional Accuracy of Dental Models for Three-Unit Prostheses Fabricated by Various 3D Printing Technologies vol.14, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14061550
- Improved procedure for Brown’s Class III maxillary reconstruction with composite deep circumflex iliac artery flap using computer-assisted technique vol.26, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/24699322.2021.1876168
- Accuracy of 3D printed polymers intended for models and surgical guides printed with two different 3D printers vol.40, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2020-039
- Precision and trueness of maxillary crowded models produced by 2 vat photopolymerization 3-dimensional printing techniques vol.160, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.06.033
- Comparison of Intaglio Surface Trueness of Interim Dental Crowns Fabricated with SLA 3D Printing, DLP 3D Printing, and Milling Technologies vol.9, pp.8, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9080983
- Effect of Different Software Programs on the Accuracy of Dental Scanner Using Three-Dimensional Analysis vol.18, pp.16, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168449
- Accuracy Evaluation of Additively and Subtractively Fabricated Palatal Plate Orthodontic Appliances for Newborns and Infants-An In Vitro Study vol.14, pp.15, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14154103
- Pilot in-vitro study on insertion/removal performance of hand-cast, milled and 3D printed splints vol.121, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104612
- Bone Regeneration of a 3D-Printed Alloplastic and Particulate Xenogenic Graft with rhBMP-2 vol.22, pp.22, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222212518
- The occlusal precision of milled versus printed provisional crowns vol.117, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103924