Applied Science and Convergence Technology

한국진공학회 (The Korean Vacuum Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study of Driving and Thermal Stability of Anode-type Ion Beam Source by Charge Repulsion Mechanism

  • Huh, Yunsung (R&D Center, Finesolution Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Hwang, Yunseok (R&D Center, Finesolution Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Kim, Jeha (Department of Energy Convergence Engineering, Cheongju University)
  • 투고 : 2018.04.27
  • 심사 : 2018.05.31
  • 발행 : 2018.05.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

We fabricated an anode-type ion beam source and studied its driving characteristics of the initial extraction of ions using two driving mechanisms: a diffusion phenomenon and a charge repulsion phenomenon. For specimen exposed to the ion beam in two methods, the surface impurity element was investigated by using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Upon Ar gas injection for plasma generation the ion beam source was operated for 48 hours. We found a Fe 2p peak 5.4 at. % in the initial ions by the diffusion mechanism while no indication of Fe in the ions released in the charge repulsion mechanism. As for a long operation of 200 min, the temperature of ion beam sources was measured to increase at the rate of ${\sim}0.1^{\circ}C/min$ and kept at the initial value of $27^{\circ}C$ for driving by diffusion and charge repulsion mechanism, respectively. In this study, we confirmed that the ion beam source driven by the charge repulsion mechanism was very efficient for a long operation as proved by little electrode damage and thermal stability.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. H.W. Choi, D.H. Park, J.H. Kim, W.K. Choi, Y.J. Sohn, B.S. Song, J. Cho, and Y.S. Kim, J. Kor. Vac. Soc. 16, 79 (2007). https://doi.org/10.5757/JKVS.2007.16.2.079
  2. Y.J. Kim, S.M. Hong, and Y.O. Noh, Polymer 37, 431 (2013).
  3. S.J. Kwon, J. Ins. Elec. Eng. Kor. 44, 26 (2007).
  4. E.S. Cho and S.J. Kwon, J. Kor. Vac. Soc. 22, 26 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5757/JKVS.2013.22.1.26
  5. V.V. Zhurin, Surface Engineering 27, 311 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1179/174329411X13019270061864
  6. G.S. Janes and R.S. Lowder, Phys. Fluids 9, 1115 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1761810
  7. H.R. Kaufman, R.S. Robinson, and R.I. Seddon, J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A5, 2081 (1987).
  8. W.C. Kim, K.H. Chung, and B.H. Choi, Rev. Sci. Instr. 65, 1356 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1144959
  9. V.S. Veerasamy, R.H. Petrmichl, H.A. Luten, and S.V. Thomsen, 45th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, (Society of Vacuum Coaters, Florida, 2002) pp. 127.
  10. N. Oudini, G.J.M. Hagelaar, J.-P. Boeuf, and L. Garrrigues, J. Appl. Phy. 109, 073310 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3572053
  11. Veeco, Patent No. US7,342,236 B2, Mar. 11 (2008).
  12. Finesolution, Patent No. KR10-1478216, Dec. 24 (2014).
  13. Finesolution, Patent No. US9,269,535 B1, Feb. 23 (2016).
  14. KIMM, Patent No. KR10-1583917, Jan. 4 (2016).
  15. K.S. SreeHarsha, Principles of Physical Vapor Deposition of Thin Films, (Elsevier Science, 2006) pp. 259-365.