실천공학교육논문지 (Journal of Practical Engineering Education)

  • 제10권1호
  • /
  • Pages.63-72
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2288-405X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-4068(eISSN)
한국실천공학교육학회 (Korean Institute for Pratical Engineering Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

상담에서 수퍼비전 작업동맹의 국내 연구 동향

A Review of Research Trends of Supervison Working Alliance for Counseling in Korea

  • 투고 : 2018.04.10
  • 심사 : 2018.05.15
  • 발행 : 2018.06.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 상담수퍼비전에서 수퍼바이저와 수퍼바이지의 관계인 작업동맹의 중요성에 주목하여 최근 국내 연구 동향을 분석하고, 향후 연구의 방향을 제시하기 위해 수행되었다. 이를 위해 분석대상 12편의 논문에 대해 연도별, 연구대상과 상담자 요인, 연구방법에 따라 분석하였다. 그 결과를 살펴보면 첫째, 2006년을 시작으로 총 12편의 연구가 진행되어 매우 부족함을 알 수 있었다. 둘째, 연구대상은 수퍼바이지(83.3%)로 편중되어 수퍼바이저와 수퍼바이지(16.7%), 수퍼바이저(0%) 대상 연구는 부족하였다. 또한 상담자 특성에 대한 연구도 수퍼바이저(17.3%)는 추론된 상태(8.3%), 추론된 특성(3.5%)이 높았다. 수퍼바이지 (82.5%)도 추론된 상태(56.3%)와 추론된 특성(27.1%)으로 연구되어 관찰가능한 상태와 특성에 대한 연구는 매우 미흡함을 알 수 있었다. 셋째, 연구방법으로는 양적 연구(100.0%)로 이루어져 질적연구가 매우 부족한 실정임을 알 수 있었다. 끝으로, 이러한 결과에 대한 논의, 연구의 제한점, 향후 연구에 대해 제언하였다.

The study was conducted to analyze domestic research trend and suggest directions of research with focusing on the importance of working alliance which relation between supervisor and supervisee in counseling supervision. The study analyzed 12 researches by chronologically, research object, counselor's factor, research method. The result is as follows. First, the research data was scant because there was only 12 articles since 2006. Second, the research, which object was supervisor(83.3%) and supervisee(16.7%) and supervisor(0%) was insufficiency with regard to the research of supervisee(83.3%). In addition to, the research about observable state and observable trait was insufficient, while inference state(56.3%) and inference trait(27.1%) was the highest in the research about Counselor's trait which object was supervisor(17.3%). Third, the method of research was quantitate research(100%), there is no qualitative research. At the last, discussion of the result, limitation of the study, follow study were proposed.

키워드

표 1. 분류범주 및 세부사항 Table 1. Classification categories and details

HSCGCO_2018_v10n1_63_t0001.png 이미지

표 2. 상담자 요인의 네 가지 분류 내용(주은선, 박영주, 2015) Table 2. Four categories of counselor factors

HSCGCO_2018_v10n1_63_t0002.png 이미지

표 3. 연도 ·자료수집기간 ·연구주제별 연구현황 Table 3. Year · Data collection period · Research subject status

HSCGCO_2018_v10n1_63_t0003.png 이미지

표 4. 연구 대상 연구현황 Table 4. Research target status

HSCGCO_2018_v10n1_63_t0004.png 이미지

표 5. 상담자 요인 분류 연구현황 Table 5. Counselor factor classification research status

HSCGCO_2018_v10n1_63_t0005.png 이미지

표 6. 연구방법 연구현황 Table 6. Research method research status

HSCGCO_2018_v10n1_63_t0006.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. "Human-Oriented 4th industrial revolution response plan for innovation growth," Joint Ministry, 2017.
  2. M. J. Kim and S. E. Kim, "Supervisee perception of ethical behavior of supervisors and its impact on the supervisory working alliance and supervision satisfaction," Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 607-627, August 2017. https://doi.org/10.23844/kjcp.2017.08.29.3.607
  3. J. Y. Kang and S. K. Yoo, "Mediating effect of working-alliance and self-disclosure in supervision in the relationship of supervisee's shame and supervision satisfaction," The Korea Journal of Counseling, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1005-1021, December 2006.
  4. J. M. Bernard and R. K. Goodyear, Fundamental of Clinical Supervision, 4th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2009.
  5. T. M. Cashwell and K. Dooley, "The impact of supervision on counselor self-efficacy," Clinical Supervisor, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 39-47, May 2001. https://doi.org/10.1300/J001v20n01_03
  6. E. L. Holloway and S. A. Neufeldt, "Supervision: Its contribution to treatment efficacy," Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 207-213, April 1995. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.63.2.207
  7. C. Loganbill, E. Hardy, and U. Delworth, "Supervision: A conceptual model," The Counseling Psychologist, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 3-42, March 1982. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000082101002
  8. D. Best, E. White, J. Cameron, A. Guthrie, B. Hunter, K. Hall, and D. I. Lubman, "A model for predicting clinician satisfaction with clinical supervision," Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 67-78, January 2014. https://doi.org/10.1080/07347324.2014.856227
  9. C. E. Watkins Jr, "The ineffective psychotherapy supervisor: Some reflections about bad behaviors, poor process, and offensive outcomes," Clinical Supervisor, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 163-180, December 1997. https://doi.org/10.1300/J001v16n01_09
  10. E. J. Son, S. K. Yoo, J. Y. Kang, and Y. S. Lim, "The influence of the supervisory working alliance and the supervisee's experience level on his or her role difficulties and supervision satisfaction," Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 695-711, November 2006.
  11. B. E. Wampold and E. L. Holloway, "Methodology, design, and evaluation in, psychotherapy supervision research," In C. E. Watkins ed. Handbook of Psychotherapy Supervision. New York: John Wiley, pp. 11-27, 1997.
  12. E. S. Bordin, "A working alliance based model of supervision," The Counseling Psychologist, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 35-42, March 1983. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000083111007
  13. M. J. Patton and Jr. D. M. Kivlighan, "Relevance of the supervisory alliance to the counseling alliance and to treatment adherence in counselor training," Journal of Counseling Psychology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 108-115, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.44.1.108
  14. J. Y. Hong, "The influence of supervisory style on the supervisory working alliance and the satisfaction with supervision," The Korea Journal of Counselin, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1489-1504, December 2008. https://doi.org/10.15703/kjc.9.4.200812.1489
  15. S. H. Sohn, "Supervisees' nondisclosure in counseling supervision," Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 57-74, February 2005.
  16. J. H. Son, "Components of effective supervision by supervisor behaviors," The Korea Journal of Counselin, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 243-261, June 2004.
  17. S. W. Kang, Y. A. Ju, and H. N. Cho, "The effect of supervisor's perception of working alliance on supervisee's self-disclosure and supervision satisfaction : a mediation analysis of supervisee's counselor self-efficacy," Institute of Social Science, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 141-171, June 2014.
  18. E. K. Seo and S. K. Yoo, "Relation of supervisee evaluation concerns perfectionism to supervisory working alliance: mediational effects of shame, self-acceptance, and cognitive coping - Comparison between counseling trainees and counselors having the certificate," Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1-26, February 2012.
  19. C. E. Watkins, "The supervisory alliance as quintessential integrative variable," Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 151-161, September 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-013-9252-x
  20. C. E. Watkins, "The supervisory alliance: A half century of theory, practice, and research in critical perspective," American Journal of Psychotherapy, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 19-55, March 2014. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2014.68.1.19
  21. E. H. Kim and S. M. Park, "The trends and issues of research on the working alliance in Korea," Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1-25, February 2011.
  22. S. H. Jo, "Analysis of research in the Korean journal of counseling and psychotherapy(1988-2003)," Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 811-832, November 2003.
  23. E. S. Joo and Y. J. Park, "Analysis of the research trends on the counselor and the Korean counselors' factors which affect counseling outcome in psychotherapy based on the Korean Journal of Psychology(1983-2012)," Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 453-484, June 2015.
  24. H. Jo, K. H. Kim, and J. M. Yi, "Analysis of research trends on career and vocational counseling in Korea: based on the Korean journal of counseling and the Korean journal of counseling and psychotherapy," The Korea Journal of Counseling, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 2099-2113, December 2009. https://doi.org/10.15703/kjc.10.4.200912.2099
  25. J. W. Creswell, "Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches," 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2003.
  26. A. J. Blow, D. H. Sprenkle, and S. D. Davis, "Is who delivers the treatment more important than the treatment itself? The role of the therapist in common factors," Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 298-317, June 2007. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2007.00029.x
  27. L. E. Beutler, M. Malik, S. Alimohamed, T. M. Harwood, H. Talebi, S. Noble, and E. Wong, "Therapist effects," in Bergin and Garfield's Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change, 5th ed. Michigan:Wiley, pp. 227-306, 2004.
  28. S. W. Kang, Y. A. Ju, and H. N. Cho, "He actor effect and partner effect of supervisor and supervisee's self-disclosure and their working alliance on supervision satisfaction," Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 631-651, September 2013.
  29. E. J. Son and S. K. Yoo, "The relations among supervisory working alliance, role difficulties, and supervision satisfaction: A cross-cultural comparison," Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 161-182, June 2007.
  30. S. H. Lee and D. M. Kim, "An investigation of WAI-T (Working Alliance Inventory-Trainee) factor structure," Asian Journal of Education, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 43-62, June 2011. https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2011.12.2.003
  31. Y. A. Ju, S. W. Kang, and H. N. Cho, "The effect of supervisee's perception of working alliance on counselor activity self efficacy and supervision satisfaction : the mediation effect of self-disclosure," The Korea Journal of Youth Counseling, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 151-171, 2014.
  32. Y. J. Lee, "The influence of supervisory style and supervisory working alliance on feedback acceptance of supervisee," Master's thesis, Graduate of School Sookmyung National University, Seoul, 2014.
  33. J. W. Ahan, "The relationships between supervisee's evaluative concerns perfectionism, nondisclosure, working alliance, and supervision satisfaction," Master's thesis, Graduate of School Sookmyung National University, Seoul, 2015.
  34. J. A. Hayes and C. J. Gelso, "Clinical implications of research on countertransference: Science informing practice," Journal of Clinical Psychology, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 1041-1051, August 2001. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.1072