산업융합연구 (Journal of Industrial Convergence)

  • 제16권1호
  • /
  • Pages.15-20
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2635-8875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2672-0124(eISSN)
대한산업경영학회 (DAEHAN Society of Industrial Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

익명성 보호를 위한 스마트 컨트랙트의 배송추적 방지 모델

Delivery Tracing Protect Model Based Smart Contract for Guaranteed Anonymity

  • 김영찬 (배재대학교 전자상거래학과) ;
  • 김영수 (배재대학교 사이버보안학과) ;
  • 임광혁 (배재대학교 전자상거래학과)
  • 투고 : 2018.02.02
  • 심사 : 2018.03.16
  • 발행 : 2018.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

인터넷 쇼핑의 증가와 함께 운송장에 적힌 배송정보를 악용한 범죄가 보이스피싱을 통한 물품 가로채기, 상해, 성범죄에 이르기까지 갈수록 고도화 세분화 되고 있다. 따라서 고객의 배송정보에 대한 익명성을 보장하기 위해서 다수 운송업자 상호간에 제품의 배송 구간에 대한 경로 정보를 비밀로 유지하는 배송추적 방지 시스템이 필요하다. 이를 위해서 인터넷 쇼핑의 대금결제와 개인정보의 연계 분리는 블록체인기반 암호화폐의 익명성 기술을 사용하여 보호하고 운송정보에 포함되는 배송정보를 암호화해서 익명성을 보호하는 배송추적 방지 모델 제안한다. 우리의 제안 모델은 고객의 배송정보에 대한 익명성을 보장함과 동시에 기업에게 고객의 배송정보를 제외한 제품판매에 대한 정보를 동시에 제공함으로서 블록체인 기반 인터넷 쇼핑의 활성화에 기여한다.

Along with the increase of internet shopping, crimes that exploited personal information on the invoice of goods are becoming more and more advanced and becoming more and more classified from the interception of goods through voice phishing attack, injury, sexual offense. Therefore, in order to guarantee the anonymity of the customer's delivery information, there is a need for a delivery tracking prevention system which keeps the route information of the product's destination secret among delivery companies. For this purpose, We suggest that delivery tracing protect model based smart contract for guaranteed anonymity to protect the anonymity by encrypting delivery information and by separation of payment and personal information using the anonymity technique of block chain-based cryptography. Our proposed model contributes to expansion of internet shopping based on block chaining by providing information about product sales to company and guaranteeing anonymity of customer's delivery information to customer.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Young Soo Kim, Hyung-Jin Mun,Hyeisun Cho, Byungik Kim, Jin Hae Lee, Jin Woo Lee, Byoung Yup Lee, The Composition and Analytical Classification of Cyber Incident based Hierarchical Cyber Observables, Journal of The Korea Contents Association, vol.16, no.11, pp.139-153, 2016. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2016.16.11.139
  2. M. Castro and B. Liskov, Practic l Byzantine fault tolerance, in Proc.OSDI, vol.99. pp.173-186. 1999.
  3. C. Cachin, R. Guerraoui, and L. Rodrigues, Introduction to Reliable and Secure Distributed Programming. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2011.
  4. Ethereum: White paper, A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform, Sept. 2014.
  5. K. Delmolino, et al.,A programmers guide to ethereum and serpent, University of Maryland, May 2015.
  6. S. Kim, M. Jun, and D. Choi, Chameleon hash-based mutual authentication protocol for secure communications in OneM2M environments, J. KICS, vol.40, no.10, pp.1958-1968, Oct. 2015. https://doi.org/10.7840/kics.2015.40.10.1958
  7. Aafaf Ouaddah, Anas Abou Elkalam, and Abdellah Ait Quahman, Towards a Novel Privacy-Preserving Access Control Model Based on Blockchain Technology in IoT, pp.523-533, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017.
  8. J. Poon and T. Dryja, The bitcoin lightning network: Scalables on-chain instant payments, 2015
  9. P. Serguei, A Probabilistic analysis of the nxt forging algorithm, ledger, vol.1 pp.69-83, 2016.
  10. M. Vukolic, The Quest for Scalable Blockchain Fablic: Proof-of-Work vs. BTF Replication, pp.112-125, Spinger International Publishing, Cham, 2016.
  11. I. Weber, X. Xu, R. Riveret, G. Governatori, A. Ponomarev, and J. Mendling, Untrusted Business Process Monitoring and Execution Using Blockchain, pp.329-347, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016.
  12. G. Wood, Ethereum: Asecure decentralised generalised transaction ledger, Ethereum Project Yellow Paper, 2014
  13. F. Dabek, M. Kaashoek, D. Karger, R. Morris, and I. Stoica. Wide-area cooperative storage with CFS. ACM SIGOPS, 2011.
  14. D. Bindel, Y. Chen, P. Eaton, et al. OceanStore : An Extremely Wide Area Storage System. Science, 2000.
  15. Aung, M. M., & Chang, Y. S., Traceability in a food supply chain: Safety and quality perspectives. Food Control, 39, pp.172-184, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.11.007
  16. Azaria, A., Ekblaw, A., Vieira, T., & Lippman, A. (2016). MedRec: Using Blockchain for Medical Data Access and Permission Management. Proceedings 2016 2nd International Conference on Open and Big Data, 2016.
  17. Bertolini, M., Bevilacqua, M., & Massini, R., FMECA approach to product traceability in the food industry. Food Control, 17(2), pp.137-145, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2004.09.013
  18. Brennan, C., & Lunn, W., Blockchain The Trusted Disrupter. Retrieved from http://www.the-blockchain.com/docs/Credit- Suisse-Blockchain-Trust-Disrupter.pdf , 2016.
  19. Li, L. D., & Zhang, H. T. Confidentiality and information sharing in supply chain coordination. Management Science, vol.54, pp.1467-1481, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0851
  20. Provenance, Blockchain: the solution for transparency in product supply chains, 2015.