The Journal of the Korea Contents Association (한국콘텐츠학회논문지)

The Korea Contents Association (한국콘텐츠학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploration of Antecedents and Moderators in Supply Chain Integration and Performance

공급망 통합 및 성과의 영향요인과 조절변수 탐색

  • Received : 2018.03.07
  • Accepted : 2018.04.12
  • Published : 2018.04.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Recently, many firms have been more interested in how the competitiveness of the supply chain can be enhanced, rather than that of the respective company. The purpose of this study is not only to investigate the relationships among the trust between companies, the supply chain integration, and the supply chain performance, but also to demonstrate how the firm size and the absorptive capacity can moderate these relationships. To conduct the hypothesis test including the causal relations between two factors and the moderating effects, 111 data were collected through a survey. As a result, the supply chain performance was positively affected by the supply chain integration as well as the trust between the companies. In addition, the trust had a significant effect on the supply chain performance. The result of the moderating effect of firm size indicates that, compared with a larger group, a smaller group has a stronger relationship between the trust and the supply chain performance, while the relationship between the supply chain integration and the supply chain performance is much stronger in the large group than the small group. As for the moderating effect of absorptive capacity, a higher absorptive group has stronger relationships between the trust and supply chain integration, and supply chain integration and supply chain performance than a lower absorptive group. The findings would provide significant implications for supply chain partners with different sizes and absorptive capacity.

최근 들어 많은 기업들이 개별 기업의 경쟁력보다는 어떻게 공급망의 경쟁력을 높일 수 있는가에 더 많은 관심을 보이고 있다. 본 연구의 목적은 공급망상에서 기업 간 신뢰, 통합, 그리고 성과 사이의 관계를 고찰하고, 기업규모와 흡수역랑이 이러한 관계들을 어떻게 조절할 수 있는가를 실증하는 것이다. 두 요인들 사이의 인과관계와 조절효과로 제시된 가설들을 검정하기 위하여 111개의 설문 데이터가 본 연구에서 사용되었다. 연구결과 공급망 성과는 기업 간 신뢰뿐만 아니라, 공급망 통합에 의해서도 긍정적인 영향을 받는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 신뢰는 공급망 통합에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 기업규모에 대한 조절효과 결과, 신뢰와 공급망 성과 사이의 관계는 소규모 집단이 대규모 집단보다 상대적으로 더 강한 인과관계를 가지는 것으로 나타났다. 그러나 공급망 통합과 공급망 성과 사이의 관계에서는 대규모 집단이 더 강한 인과관계를 보여주었다. 흡수역량에 대한 조절효과는 신뢰와 공급망 통합의 관계에서 그리고 공급망 통합과 공급망 성과와의 관계에서 고흡수 집단이 저흡수 집단에 비하여 더 강한 인과관계를 보였다. 본 연구의 결과는 서로 다른 기업규모와 흡수역량을 가진 공급망 참여 기업들에게 의미 있는 함의를 제공할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. 박광오, "정보특성이 정보역량에 미치는 영향," 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제13권, 제12호, pp.389-401, 2013. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2013.13.12.389
  2. M. Sambasivan, L. Siew-Phaik, Z. Abidin- Mohamed, and Y. Choy-Leong, "Factors Influencing Strategic Alliance Outcomes In a Manufacturing Supply Chain: Role of Alliance Motives, Interdependence, Asset Specificity and Relational Capital," International J. of Production Economics, Vol.141, No.1, pp.339-351, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.08.016
  3. 박철순, "공급사슬 통합과 기업성과의 관계: 기업 규모의 조절효과," 경영학연구, 제41권, 제6호, pp.501-1527, 2012.
  4. M. Cao and Q. Zhang, "Supply Chain Collaboration: Impact on Collaborative Advantage and Firm Performance," J. of operations management, Vol.29, No.3, pp.163-180, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2010.12.008
  5. 박다현, 박상욱, "구매자협력이 신제품의 성과에 미치는 영향과 구매자-공급자 관계의 조절적 역할," 경영학연구, 제41권, 제3호, pp.457-482, 2012.
  6. X. Zhao, B. Huo, B. Flynn, and J. Yeung, "The Impact of Power and Relationship Commitment on the Integration between Manufacturers and Customers in a Supply Chain," J. of Operations Management, Vol.26, No.3, pp.368-388, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.08.002
  7. 홍관수, "구매자와 공급자의 관계에서 사회자본이 지식공유와 혁신 상품개발성과에 미치는 영향: 흡수능력과 파트너십의 역할," 상품학연구, 제32권, 제3호, pp.21-36, 2014.
  8. J. Nahapiet and S. Ghoshal, "Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage," Academy of Management Review, Vol.23, No.2, pp.242-266, 1998. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533225
  9. 권영훈, 구철모, "SCM정보기술, 흡수역량, 지식공유의 기업성과에 대한 영향 연구," 한국생산관리학회지, 제19권, 제2호, pp.3-26, 2008.
  10. M. M. Kristal, A. V. Roth, and X. Huang, "The Effect of an Ambidextrous Supply Chain Strategy on Combinative Competitive Capabilities and Business Performance," J. of Operations Management, Vol.28, No.5, pp.415-429, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.12.002
  11. O. E. Williamson, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting, The Free Press, NewYork, 1985.
  12. G. Walker and L. Poppo, "Profit Centers, Single-source Suppliers, and Transaction Costs," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.36, No.1, pp.66-87, 1991. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393430
  13. R. D. Ireland and J. W. Webb, "Strategic Entrepreneurship: Creating Competitive Advantage Through Streams of Innovation," Business Horizons, Vol.50, pp.49-59, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2006.06.002
  14. J. Dyer and H. Singh, "The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage," Academy of Management Review, Vol.23, No.4, pp.660-679, 1998. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.1255632
  15. J. C. Anderson and J. A. Narus, "A Model of Distributor Firm and Manufacturing Firm Working Partnerships," J. of Marketing, Vol.54, No.1, pp.42-58, 1990. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252172
  16. B. J. LaLonde and M. C. Cooper, Partnerships in Providing Customer Service: A Third Party Perspective, Council of Logistics Management, Oakbrook, IL., 1989.
  17. J. R. Brown, R. F. Lusch, and C. Y. Nicholson, "Power and Relationship Commitment: Their Impact on Marketing Channel Member Performance," J. of Retailing, Vol.71, No.4, pp.363-392, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4359(95)90019-5
  18. S. Carey, B. Lawsonb, and A. R. Krausec, "Social Capital Configuration, Legal Bonds and Performance in Buyer-Supplier Relationships," J. of Operations Management, Vol.29, No.4, pp.277-288, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2010.08.003
  19. B. B. Flynn, B. Huo, and X. Zha, "The Impact of Supply Chain Integration on Performance: A Contingency and Configuration Approach," J. of Operations Management, Vol.28, No.1, pp.58-71, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.06.001
  20. G. C. Stevens, "Integrating the Supply Chain," International J. of Physical Distribution and Materials Management, Vol.19, No.8, pp.3-8, 1989.
  21. S. K. Vickery, J. Jayaram, C. Droge, and R. Calantone, "The Effects of an Integrative Supply Chain Strategy on Customer Service and Financial Performance: An Analysis of Direct Versus Indirect Relationships," J. of Operations Management, Vol.21, No.5, pp.523-539, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2003.02.002
  22. C. Y. Wong, S. Boon-itt, and C. W. Wong, "The Contingency Effects of Environmental Uncertainty on the Relationship between Supply Chain Integration and Operational Performance," J. of Operations Management, Vol.29, No.6, pp.604-615, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2011.01.003
  23. P. Danese and P. Romano, "Supply Chain Integration and Efficiency Performance: A Study on the Interactions between Customer and Supplier Integration," Supply Chain Management: An International J., Vol.16, No.4, pp.220-230, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541111139044
  24. J. Jayaram and M. K. Malhotra, "The Differential and Contingent Impact of Concurrency on New Product Development Project Performance: A Holistic Examination," Decision Sciences, Vol.41, No.1, pp.147-196, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2009.00262.x
  25. M. M. Mishra and R. Shah, "In Union Lies Strength: Collaborative Competence in New Product Development and Its Performance Effects," J. of Operations Management, Vol.27, No.4, pp.324-338, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2008.10.001
  26. A. Paulraj and I. Chen, "Environmental Uncertainty and Strategic Supply Management: A Resource Dependence Perspective and Performance Implications," J. of Supply Chain Management, Vol.43, No.3, pp.29-42, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2007.00033.x
  27. M. S. Sodhi and B. Son, "Supply-chain Partnership Performance," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol.45, No.6, pp.937-945, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2009.05.004
  28. 김경규, 김성기, 류성열, "공급체인의 투기 및 순 연 전략 적합성이 고객 만족도에 미치는 영향-전자제품을 중심으로-," 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제 10권, 제9호, pp.363-374, 2010. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2010.10.9.363
  29. A. Konig and S. Spinler, "The Effect of Logistics Outsourcing on the Supply Chain Vulnerability of Shippers," International J. of Logistics Management, Vol.27, No.1, pp.122-141, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-03-2014-0043
  30. 박광오, "실시간 기업의 특성이 공급사슬성과에 미치는 영향," 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제13권, 제6호, pp.390-400, 2013. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2013.13.06.390
  31. R. Sousa and C. A. Voss, "Contingency Research in Operations Management Practices," J. of Operations Management, Vol.26, No.6, pp.697-713, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2008.06.001
  32. 김형기, 문종범, 최창열, "공급사슬 통합요인이 기업 성과에 미치는 영향에 대한 실증분석," e-비즈니스연구, 제9권, 제1호, pp.3-25, 2008.
  33. W. M. Cohen and D. Levinthal, "Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.35, No.1, pp.128-152, 1990. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  34. S. A. Zahra and G. George, "Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension," Academy of Management Review, Vol.27, No.2, pp.185-203, 2002. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995
  35. Y. He, K. K. Lai, H. Sun, and Y. Chen, "The Impact of Supplier Integration on Customer Integration and New Product Performance: The Mediating Role of Manufacturing Flexibility Under Trust Theory," International J. of Production Economics, Vol.47, pp.260-270, 2014.
  36. P. Patel, S. Terjesen, and D. Li, "Enhancing Effects of Manufacturing Flexibility Through Operational Absorptive Capacity and Operational Ambidexterity," J. of Operations Management, Vol.30, No.3, pp.201-220, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2011.10.004
  37. J. Perols, C. Zimmermann, and S. Kortmann, "On the Relationship between Supplier Integration and Time-to-market," J. of Operations Management, Vol.31, No.3, pp.153-167, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2012.11.002
  38. M. Bensaou and N. Venkatraman, "Configurations of Interorganizational Relationship: A Comparison between U.S. and Japanese Automakers," Management Science, Vol.41, No.9, pp.1471-1492, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.41.9.1471
  39. L. Cummings and P. Bromiley, The organizational trust inventory (OTI): Development and validation, In R. M. Kramer and T. R. Tyler (eds), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, pp.302-330, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996.
  40. A. S. Carr and J. N. Pearson, "Strategically Managed Buyer-seller Relationships and Performance Outcomes," J. of Operations Management, Vol.17, No.5, pp.497-519, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(99)00007-8
  41. J. C. Anderson and D. W. Gerbing, "Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-step Approach," Psychological Bulletin, Vol.103, No.3, pp.411-423, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
  42. W. Chin, PLS-Graph User's Guide Version 3.0, C.T. Bauer College of Business, University of Houston, Houston, 2001.
  43. J. R. Hair, R. Anderson, R. Tatham, and W. Black, Multivariate Data Analysis 9ed, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1988.
  44. R. Falk and N. Miller, A Primer for Soft Modeling, Univ. of Akron Press, Akron, OH, 1992.
  45. C. Fornell and D. Larcker, "Structural Equation Models With Unobservable Variables and Measurement Errors," J. of Marketing Research, Vol.18, No.2, pp.39-50, 1981. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  46. W. Chin, B. L. Marcolin, and P. R. Newsted, "A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effect: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and Voice Mail Emotion/Adoption Study," 17th International Conference in Information Systems, OH, pp.21-41, 1996.
  47. U. Lichtenthaler, "Absorptive Capacity, Environmental Turbulence, and the Complementarity of Organizational Learning Processes," Academy of Management J., Vol.52, No.4, pp.822-846, 2009. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.43670902