디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제16권12호
  • /
  • Pages.123-135
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

프로젝트형 SCM의 개념적 틀에 관한 탐색적 연구 : 플랜트 엔지니어링 기업을 중심으로

An Exploratory Study on Conceptual Framework for Project-based Supply Chain Management : Focusing on Plant Engineering Firms

  • 투고 : 2018.09.11
  • 심사 : 2018.12.20
  • 발행 : 2018.12.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 플랜트 엔지니어링 산업에 속하는 대기업들의 공급망관리 도입과 운영에 대한 문제점을 살펴보고 이를 개선하기 위한 기본틀을 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 관련 자료의 축적을 위한 사례연구결과, EPC 형태의 사업운영과 더불어 프로젝트 관련 결정의 조정능력 및 정보공유 부족, 적절한 위험 및 변화시스템의 부재 등은 납기지연 및 예산 초과로 이어진다는 것도 알 수 있게 되었다. 공급망의 정보화는 경쟁력 제고와 직결되므로, EPC 프로젝트 공급망의 협업관련 정보화와 정보공유 수준을 살펴보기 위해 공급망을 구성하는 협력업체에게 설문조사를 실시하였다. 통계적 분석결과, 정보공유, 디자인과 설계활동의 조기참여 및 SCM에 대한 인식은 공급망 상의 협업에 긍정적 영향을 미치나 협력업체의 정보화나 평가는 유의미한 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 이외에도 설계 및 엔지니어링, 조달, 시공의 여러 부문을 통합하는데 기여할 수 있는 프로젝트 공급망관리 모형을 제안했으며 이를 통해 몇 가지 실무적 시사점도 기술하였다.

The objective of this paper is to investigate the issues related to the supply chain management in plant engineering industry, and propose the framework to improve the project efficiency. The preliminary case study shows that EPC's fragmented nature, lack of coordination and information sharing, and lack of proper risk and change management contribute to project delay and cost overrun. To examine the level of informatization and information sharing in supply chain, survey responses from the suppliers and subcontractors have been collected. The statistical results show that information sharing, early involvement in design process and awareness in SCM have influenced the level of collaboration, but supplier assessment and informatization have no impact on the collaboration. A conceptual model is proposed in order to facilitate the integration of design, procurement and construction functions. Implications from the study are also provided.

키워드

DJTJBT_2018_v16n12_123_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. The Basic Structure of Project-based Supply Chain Management

Table 1. Scale items and Reliability

DJTJBT_2018_v16n12_123_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Total Variance Explained and Eigenvalues

DJTJBT_2018_v16n12_123_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Regression Analysis

DJTJBT_2018_v16n12_123_t0003.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. J. Cho, H. Seo, K. Tak & H. Han. (2016). How to Survive the Crisis in the Korean Plant Ebgineering Industry, focusing on the FEED. Seoul : KEIT.
  2. T. U. Kim. (2012). An Exploratory Study on Information Sharing, Incentives and Collaboration in Project-based Supply Chain. Journal of the Korean Production and Operations Management Society, 23(1), 71-87.
  3. J. H. Seo, K. R. Park & M. S. Yoon. (2017). Design and Implementation of web-based production monitoring system for small manufacturers. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 8(8), 89-94. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2017.8.8.089
  4. T. Y. Ha & Y. Y. You. (2018). A study on the effect of ERP Construction strategy and IT Consulting Service Quality on Performance. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 9(9), 217-228. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2018.9.9.217
  5. H. G. Cheong, S. T. Park & T. U. Kim. (2012). Concept and Issues in Supply Chain Management for Plant Engineering Project. Journal of Digital Convergence, 19(9), 212-224.
  6. A. Hartmann & J. Caerteling. (2010). Subcontractor procurement in construction: the interplay of price and trust. Supply chain management: an international journal, 15(5), 354-362. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541011068288
  7. J. H. Dyer & K. Nobeoka. (2000). Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: the Toyota case. Strategic management journal, 345-367.
  8. F. J. Ying, J. Tookey & H. Roberti. (2014). Development of SCM competencies in construction: lessons learned from New Zealand. Auckland : New Zealnd Government.
  9. G. A. Papadopoulos, N. Zamer, S.P. Gayialis, & L.P. Tatsiopoulos. (2016). Supply Chain Improvement in Construction Industry.
  10. J. Whyte, A. Stasis & C. Lindkvist. (2016). Managing change in the delivery of complex projects: Configuration management, asset information and big data. International Journal of Project Management, 34(2), 339-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.02.006
  11. H. A. Hornstein. (2015). The integration of project management and organizational change management is now a necessity. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 291-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.08.005
  12. R. Sanders. (2008). Pattern of information technology use: The impact on buyer-suppler coordination and performance. Journal of Operations Management, 26, 349-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.07.003
  13. J. F. Zhang, Z. J. Wu, P. F. Feng & D. W. Yu. (2011). Evaluation systems and methods of enterprise informatization and its application. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(7), 8938-8948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.01.111
  14. J. Peppard & J. Ward (2016). The strategic management of information systems: Building a digital strategy. John Wiley & Sons.
  15. K. A. Al-Busaidi & L. Olfman. (2017). Knowledge sharing through inter-organizational knowledge sharing systems. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 47(1), 110-136. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-05-2016-0019
  16. L. Wu, C. Chuang & C. H. Hsu. (2014). Information sharing and collaborative behaviors in enabling supply chain performance: A social exchange perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 148, 122-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.09.016
  17. H. Lee, M.S. Kim & K. Kim. (2014). Interorganizational information systems visibility and supply chain performance. International Journal of Information Management, 34(2), 285-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.10.003
  18. S. T. Park, M. K. Rhee & S. Ryu. (2014). A study on the effect of network embeddedness on collaboration and performance in the project supply chain : focusing on second-tier suppliers. Journal of Digital Convergence, 12(6), 93-103. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2014.12.6.93
  19. M. A. Zainol, Z. Abas & A. S. Ariffin. (2016). Supply Chain Integration and Technological Innovation for Business Performance of Aquaculture Contract Farming in Malaysia: A Conceptual Overview. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 5(3), 86-90.
  20. M. Persson, M.J. Eklind & M. Winroth. (2016). Coordinating External Manufacturing of Product Modules. Decision Sciences, 47(6), 1178-1202. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12197
  21. A. Arantes, L. Ferreira & A. Costa. (2015). Is the construction industry aware of supply chain management? The Portuguese contractors' perspective. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(4), 404-414. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-06-2014-0207
  22. G. Singh, R. Arora & V. Mishra. (2014). Emerging Trends in Supply Chain Management. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 3(10), 100-103. https://doi.org/10.15623/ijret.2014.0322021
  23. S. W. Park & S. T. Park. (2013). A study on the impact of supply chain partnership on performance of suppliers. Journal of Digital Convergence, 11(10), 169-179. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2013.11.10.169
  24. W. Ho, X. Xu & P.K. Dey. (2010). Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. European Journal of operational research, 20(1), 16-24.
  25. P. E. Eriksson. (2008). Procurement effects on competition in client-contractor relationships. Journal of Construction Engineering Management, 134(2), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:2(103)
  26. Y. S. Cho & K. I. Khoe. (2018). The moderating effects of organizational culture on the relationship among open information innovation, strategic alliance and export performance of SMEs, Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 8(2), 219-225. https://doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2018.8.2.219
  27. S. M. Jang & K. I. Kim. (2018). The effects of the environmental factors for ICT adoption on globalization capabilities and business performance of SMEs. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 8(4), 219-224. https://doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2018.8.4.219