DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Developing Evaluation Criteria and Indicators of Decent Forest Jobs

양질의 산림일자리 평가 기준 및 지표 개발

  • Han, Hee (Division of Forest Industry, National Institute of Forest Science) ;
  • Bae, Jae Soo (Division of Forest Industry, National Institute of Forest Science) ;
  • Chang, Chu Youn (Division of Forest Industry, National Institute of Forest Science) ;
  • Kim, Ki Dong (Division of Forest Industry, National Institute of Forest Science) ;
  • Jeon, Hyon Sun (Warm Temperate and Subtropical Forest Research Center, National Institute of Forest Science)
  • 한희 (국립산림과학원 산림산업연구과) ;
  • 배재수 (국립산림과학원 산림산업연구과) ;
  • 장주연 (국립산림과학원 산림산업연구과) ;
  • 김기동 (국립산림과학원 산림산업연구과) ;
  • 전현선 (국립산림과학원 난대.아열대 산림연구소)
  • Received : 2018.10.10
  • Accepted : 2018.12.10
  • Published : 2018.12.31

Abstract

With respect to the quantity, quality and social value of forest jobs, we have developed three major criteria and 11 indicators for evaluating decent forest jobs. The importance and weighted value of the criteria and indicators were investigated through a survey which was conducted on 50 experts involved in Governmental Forest Job Committee, academic and different groups of communities. The 35 experts responded to the survey chose the 'job creation potential' as the most important criterion, and they recognized the 'job quality' has a relatively higher importance than the 'social contribution'. The survey results showed that 'political will' and 'job security' have the highest weighted values among indicators while 'wage level' has the lowest value. The developed criteria and indicators are able to be used as a means of evaluating degree of decent forest jobs for both new and existing jobs.

일자리의 양과 질, 사회적 가치의 측면에서 산림일자리가 얼마나 양질인가를 평가하기 위한 3대 기준과 11개 지표를 개발하였다. 기준 및 지표의 중요도와 가중치는 산림일자리위원회, 학계 등 일자리 관련 전문가 50명을 대상으로 실시한 설문을 통해 설정하였다. 설문에 응답한 35명의 전문가들은 '일자리 창출 잠재력'을 가장 중요한 기준으로 선택하였으며, '일자리 질'이 '사회공헌도'보다 상대적으로 높은 중요도를 갖는 것으로 인식하였다. 지표의 가중치는 일자리 창출 잠재력의 '정책적 의지'가 가장 높게 나타났고, 일자리 질의 '고용 안전성'을 다음으로 높게 인식하였다. 반면 일자리 질의 '임금 수준'은 가장 낮은 가중치를 나타내었다. 개발된 기준과 지표는 신규 산림일자리는 물론 기존의 산림일자리에 대한 양질의 일자리 평가 수단으로써 활용이 가능하다.

Keywords

HOMHBJ_2018_v107n4_446_f0001.png 이미지

Figure 1. Selection procedure of the evaluation criteria and indicators.

HOMHBJ_2018_v107n4_446_f0002.png 이미지

Figure 2. Three evaluation criteria of decent forest jobs.

Table 1. Numbers of personnels questioned and respondents of individual organizations in expert survey.

HOMHBJ_2018_v107n4_446_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Forest jobs investigated for applicability test on the evaluation criteria and indicators of decent forest jobs.

HOMHBJ_2018_v107n4_446_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Numbers of projects and created jobs, and associated financial investment in the Comprehensive Plan for Forest Jobs of Koreaa.

HOMHBJ_2018_v107n4_446_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Decent work indicators of International Labour Organizationa.

HOMHBJ_2018_v107n4_446_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Indicators for evaluating the quality of employment at personal levela.

HOMHBJ_2018_v107n4_446_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6. Evaluation criteria and indicators of decent forest jobs developed in this study.

HOMHBJ_2018_v107n4_446_t0006.png 이미지

Table 7. Importance value of criteria and indicators, and weighted values for evaluating decent forest jobs.

HOMHBJ_2018_v107n4_446_t0007.png 이미지

Table 8. Result of applicability test on the evaluation criteria and indicators of decent forest jobs.

HOMHBJ_2018_v107n4_446_t0008.png 이미지

References

  1. Bonnet, J., Figueiredo, J.B. and Standing, G. 2003. A family of decent work indexes. International Labour Review 142(2): 213-238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2003.tb00259.x
  2. Han, H., Chang, C.Y., Kim, K.D., Bae, J.S., and Jeon, H.S. 2018a. Prospects and Policy Directions for Forest Jobs. pp. 47-72. In: Kim, K.H., Jung, B.H., Kim, K.D., Lee, H.S., Won, H.K., Lee, S.J., Chang, C.Y., Lim, J.H., Bae, J.S., Jeon, H.S., Seol, A., Ko, D.S., Lee, B.D., Kim, D.Y., Woo, C.S., Han, H., Kwon, C.G., Chung, H.G., Choi, J.Y., Beon, S.Y., En, J.H., Chung, D.Y., Choi, H.T., Kim, Y.H., and Lee, J.H. (Eds.), 2018. Forest.Forestry Outlook. National Institute of Forest Science, Republic of Korea. pp. 261. (in Korean)
  3. Han, H., Kim, K.D., Chang, C.Y., Bae, J.S. and Jeon, H.S. 2018b. Development of Indicators for Evaluating Decent Forest Jobs and Its Political Applications. Forest Policy Issue No. 100. National Institute of Forest Science, Republic of Korea. pp. 21. (in Korean)
  4. ILO (International Labor Organization). 2002. Decent Work and The Informal Economy. pp. 129.
  5. ILO (International Labor Organization). 2013. Decent Work Indicators: Guidelines for Producers and Users of Statistical and Legal Framework Indicators. pp. 257.
  6. Kim, J.-S., Kim, J.M. and Sung, J.H. 2005. A study on developing the index for forest sustainability in Korea. Journal of Korean Society 94(3): 183-190. (in Korean)
  7. Kim, J.-S., Sung, J.H. and Kim, J.M. 2006. Developing forest sustainability indices of provinces in South Korea. Journal of Korean Society 95(6): 696-704. (in Korean)
  8. Kim, S.H., Jeong, B.H. and Kim, J.G. 1999. Analysis on Decision Making and Application. Youngji publishers. pp. 487. (in Korean)
  9. KFS (Korea Forest Service). 2017. A Comprehensive Plan for Forest Jobs. pp. 167. (in Korean)
  10. KIAT and KIET (Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology and Korea Institute for Industrial Economics & Trade). 2016. Prediction on Market and Personnel demand in New Promising Industries for the Future of Korea. pp. 34. (in Korean)
  11. Phang, H.N. and Lee, S.H. 2006. A study on conceptualization and measurement of "good job". Korean Journal of Sociology 40: 93-127. (in Korean)
  12. Phang, H.N., Lee, Y.M., Kim, K.H., Kim, H.J. and Lee, S.H. 2007. The Quality of Employment: Development and Evaluation of Indicators at Personal, Enterprise, and Macro Level. Korea Labor Institute Research Report 2007-02. pp. 243. (in Korean)
  13. Presidential Committee on Jobs. 2017. A Five-year Road map for Job Policies of Korea. pp. 63. (in Korean)
  14. Ritter, J.A. and Anker, R. 2002. Good jobs, bad jobs: worker's evaluations in five countries. International Labour Review 141(4): 331-358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2002.tb00244.x
  15. Song, M., Bae, J.S. and Seol, M.H. 2014. Development of the forest carbon sink index on afforestation and reforestation activities. Journal of Korean Forest Society 103(1): 137-146. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.14578/jkfs.2014.103.1.137
  16. UN (United Nations). 2015. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. pp. 35. (in Korean)