Journal of Soil and Groundwater Environment (한국지하수토양환경학회지:지하수토양환경)

Korean Society of Soil and Groundwater Environment (한국지하수토양환경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Future Direction on Policy and Technology Development for the Risk-based Contaminated Site Management

위해성 기반 오염부지관리를 위한 정책 및 기술개발 방향

  • Cho, Myung-Hyun (Department of Environmental Engineering and Soil Environment Research Center, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Do-Hyung (Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute) ;
  • Baek, Kitae (Department of Environmental Engineering and Soil Environment Research Center, Chonbuk National University)
  • 조명현 (전북대학교 환경공학과 및 토양환경연구센터) ;
  • 김도형 (한국환경산업기술원) ;
  • 백기태 (전북대학교 환경공학과 및 토양환경연구센터)
  • Received : 2017.08.25
  • Accepted : 2017.09.09
  • Published : 2017.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Korea and other countries have made various efforts to preserve soil. During the past several decades, Korea has implemented various policies on soil conservation practices; however, those policies have often lacked consideration of human and ecosystem risk management. while other countries have practiced various policies closely related to risk-based management for contaminated sites. Therefore, there is a great need for a paradigm shift of policy to better manage contaminated sites in risk-based strategies, while applying different management plans for soil and groundwater. In addition, the new policies should be administered with provision to improve soil health and related functions in ecosystem. This study has reviewed the trend in relevant policies in Korea and foreign countries to suggest the future policy directions for contaminated site management in Korea. For better management of contaminated sites, coherent policy that could complement the law, system, and relevant technology is required.

Keywords

References

  1. Asensio, V., Rodriguez, A., Gamendia, L., Andre, J., Kille, P., Morgan, A.J., Soto, M., and Marigomez, I., 2013, Towards an intergrative soil health assessment strategy : A three tier (intergrative biomarker response) approach with Eisenia fetida applied to soils subjected to chronic metal pollution, Sci. Total. Environ., 442, 344-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.09.048
  2. Chae, Y.E., Kim, S.W., Kwak, J.I., Yoon, Y.D., Jeong, S.W., and An, Y.J., 2015, A comparative study of assessment techniques for soil ecosystem health: Focusing on assessment factors of soil health, J. Soil Groundw. Environ., 20(3), 15-24. https://doi.org/10.7857/JSGE.2015.20.3.015
  3. Chinese Ministry of Environmental Protection, http://www.zhb.gov.cn/ [accessed 17.08.20]
  4. DEFRA, 2009, Soil strategy for England supporting evidence paper, UK.
  5. EA, 2006, The development and use of soil quality indicators for assessing the role of soil in environmental interactions, Science Report SC030265, Environmental Agency, Bristol, UK.
  6. Federal Ministry for the Environment, 2002, German Federal Government Soil Protection Report, Bonn, Germany.
  7. Japanese Ministry of the Environment, http://www.env.go.jp/water/ [accessed 17.09.01]
  8. Kerth, M., 2014, A Report of Management of Contaminated Land Registry and Suspicious Soil Contamination in Germany, KEI International Environmental Policy Forum for Soil and Groundwater, Sejong, Republic of Korea.
  9. Yoo, K.J., Yang, J.H., Kim, J.H., and Hwang, S.I., 2016, A study on present international status and implications for introduction of contaminated land register system into Korea, J. Soil Groundw. Environ., 21(4), 10-19. https://doi.org/10.7857/JSGE.2016.21.4.010
  10. Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI), 2015, Final Report: Study on the Surface Environment Management Technology Development Project.
  11. Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning (KISTEP). 2015, 2015 Technology Evaluation.
  12. Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE), http://www.me.go.kr/home/web/index.do?menuId=286 [accessed 17.08.20]
  13. Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2003a, Study on Risk Assessment Plans for Soil Contamination.
  14. Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2003b, Study on the Development of Soil Contamination and Rehabilitation Criteria by Land Use.
  15. Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2007a, Guideline on Remediation Methods for Contaminated Soil.
  16. Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2007b, Study on Priority Selection of Soil Contaminants.
  17. Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2008, Study on the Improvement of the Risk Assessment System for Soil Contamination.
  18. Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2009, Soil Conservation Master Plan (2009-2019).
  19. Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2012, Environmental Technology Roadmap (Eco-TRM 2022).
  20. Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2013, Comprehensive Plan for Surface Soil Conservation (2013-2017).
  21. Korea Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT), 2012, Groundwater Management Master Plan (2012-2021).
  22. LIFE Environment, 2014, LIFE and Soil protection. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. European Union.
  23. Marc van Liedekerke, M., Prokop, G., Rabl-Berger, S., Kibblewhite, M., and Louwagie, G., 2014, Progress in the management of Contaminated Sites in Europe. Joint Research Centre of the European Commission. European Union.
  24. Ok, Y.S., Yang, J.E., and Park, Y.H., 2005, Framework on soil quality indicator selection and assessment for the sustainable soil management, J. Environ. Policy., 4(1), 69-87.
  25. Ok, Y.S., Lim, S., and Kim, J.G., 2002, Electrochemical properties of soils: Principles and applications, Life Sci. and Nat. Resour. Res., 10, 69-84.
  26. Panagos, P., Van Liedekerke, M., Yigini, Y., and Montanarella, L., 2013, Contaminated sites in Europe: Review of the current situation based on data collected through a European Network, J. Environ. Public Health., Article ID:158764.
  27. Park, Y.H., 2017, Policy approaches for expanding the scope of risk assessment at contaminated soil sites in South Korea, J. Environ. Policy., 25(2), 183-198.
  28. Park, Y.H., Yang, J.E., and Ok, Y.S., 2005, Policy Suggestions to Korea from a Comparison Study of the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands, and Denmarks's Policies on Risk Assessment of Contaminated Soils, J. Soil Groundw. Environ., 10(5), 1-10.
  29. USDA, 2013, National Soil Survey Handbook Part 622, National Resources Conservation Service Soils, United States Department of Agriculture.
  30. USEPA 1999, Risk assessment guidance for superfund, Washington D.C., USA.
  31. USEPA, http:// www.epa.gov/land-research/ research-management-contaminated-sites [accessed 17.08.20]
  32. USEPA, 2001, Road Map to Understanding Innovative Technology Options for Brownfields Investigation and Cleanup.
  33. USEPA, 2003, Using the Triad Approach to Streamline Brownfields Site Assessment and Clean-up.