DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Balancing Efficiency and Flexibility in Software Project: The Role of Team Collective Improvisation, behavioral integration, and member diversity

  • Lee, Young-Joo (National Information Society Agency (NIA)) ;
  • Lee, Jung-Hoon (Graduate School of Information of Yonsei University) ;
  • Ham, Kyung Sun (Convergence System R&D Division, Korea Electronics Technology Institute (KETI))
  • Published : 2017.06.30

Abstract

The successful management of software (SW) projects is a continuous concern to managers, which is attributed to the contradictory demands that most projects are facing; meeting user requirements within time and budget limit while flexibly dealing risks during the progress of the projects. The present study asserts project performance and risk mitigation are not tradeoff but to be achieved simultaneously, which is called SW project ambidexterity. Drawing on the literature on organizational behavior, hypotheses are developed speculating the relation among project performance, risk mitigation, team collective improvisation, team behavioral integration, and team diversity. Using empirical data collected from 102 SW project teams of 507 team members in South Korea, empirical analysis indicates team collective improvisation is a significant antecedent to SW project ambidexterity, playing a pivotal role to balance the contradictory demands. Furthermore, team behavioral integration positively influences the degree of team collective improvisation, and the magnitude of the relation is partially contingent on the team members' age and major diversity. The present study advances theory by providing a context specific explanation about the SW project ambidexterity and its precedents.

Keywords

References

  1. Aiken, L. S. and S. G. West (1991), Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage. ISBN 0761907122.
  2. Akgun, A. E., J. C. Byrne, G. S. Lynn and H. Keskin (2007), "New product development in turbulent environments: Impact of improvisation and unlearning on new product performance". Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 24(3): 203-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2007.05.008
  3. Baron, R. M. and D. A. Kenny (1986), "The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6): 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  4. Blau, P. M. (1977), "A macrosociological theory of social structure." American journal of sociology, 26-54.
  5. Boehm, B. W. (1991), "Software risk management: principles and practices". Software, IEEE, 8(1): 32-41. https://doi.org/10.1109/52.62930
  6. Bradley, J. H. and F. J. Hebert (1997), "The effect of personality type on team performance". Journal of Management Development, 16(5): 337-353. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621719710174525
  7. Burgelman, R. A. (1983), "A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm". Administrative Science Quarterly: 223-244.
  8. Carmeli, A. and J. Schaubroeck (2006), "Top management team behavioral integration, decision quality, and organizational decline". The Leadership Quarterly, 17(5): 441-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.06.001
  9. Cerpa, N. and J. M. Verner (2009), "Why did your project fail?". Communications of the ACM, 52(12): 130-134. https://doi.org/10.1145/1610252.1610286
  10. Chelariu, C., W. J. Johnston and L. Young (2002), "Learning to improvise, improvising to learn: a process of responding to complex environments". Journal of Business Research, 55(2): 141-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00149-1
  11. Ciborra, C. U. (1999a), "Notes on improvisation and time in organizations". Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 9(2): 77-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8022(99)00002-8
  12. Ciborra, C. U. 1999b. "A theory of information systems based on improvisation". In Rethinking management information systems, Edited by W. L. Currie and B. Gallers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  13. Conradi, R. and A. Fuggetta (2002), "Improving software process improvement". IEEE software, 19(4): 92-99. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2002.1020295
  14. Cooke-Davies, T. (2002), "The "real" success factors on projects". International Journal of Project Management, 20(3): 185-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00067-9
  15. Cunha, P. E., J. Vieira Da Cunha and S. Clegg (2009), "Improvisational bricolage: a practicebased approach to strategy and foresight". In Handbook of research on strategy and foresight, Edited by L. A. Costanzo and R. B. MacKay. US: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  16. De Bakker, K., A. Boonstra and H. Wortmann (2010), "Does risk management contribute to IT project success? A meta-analysis of empirical evidence". International Journal of Project Management, 28(5): 493-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.07.002
  17. Delone, W. H. (2003), "The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update". Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4): 9-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
  18. Dyba, T. (2000), "Improvisation in small software organizations". Software, IEEE, 17(5): 82-87. https://doi.org/10.1109/52.877872
  19. Elbanna, A. R. (2006), "The validity of the improvisation argument in the implementation of rigid technology: the case of ERP systems". Journal of Information Technology, 21(3): 165-175. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000069
  20. Faisal, M. N., D. Banwet and R. Shankar (2006), "Mapping supply chains on risk and customer sensitivity dimensions". Industrial Management & Data Systems, 106(6): 878-895. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570610671533
  21. Faraj, S. and L. Sproull (2000), "Coordinating expertise in software development teams". Management Science, 46(12): 1554-1568. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.12.1554.12072
  22. Ford, J. K., R. C. MacCallum and M. Tait (1986), "The application of exploratory factor analysis in applied psychology: A critical review and analysis". Personnel Psychology, 39(2): 291-314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1986.tb00583.x
  23. Fornell, C. and D. F. Larcker (1981), "Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error". Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1): 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  24. Gallardo-Valencia, R. E. and S. E. Sim (2007), "Planning and improvisation in software processes". Crossroads, 14(1): 3. https://doi.org/10.7459/pc/14.1.01
  25. Gorla, N. and Y. W. Lam (2004), "Who should work with whom?: building effective software project teams". Communications of the ACM, 47(6): 79-82. https://doi.org/10.1145/990680.990684
  26. Hair, J., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, R. E. Anderson and R. L. Tatham (2006), Multivariate Data Analysis. 6 Ed. Prentice Hall.
  27. Hambrick, D. C. (1994), "Top management groups: A conceptual integration and reconsideration of the" team" label". Research in organizational behavior, 16: 171-171.
  28. Han, J. and A. Hovav (2013), "To bridge or to bond? Diverse social connections in an IS project team". International Journal of Project Management, 31(3): 378-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.09.001
  29. Han, W.-M. and S.-J. Huang (2007). "An empirical analysis of risk components and performance on software projects". Journal of Systems and Software, 80(1): 42-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2006.04.030
  30. Harrison, D. A. and K. J. Klein (2007). "What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations". Academy of Management Review, 32(4): 1199-1228. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.26586096
  31. Harrison, D. A., K. H. Price and M. P. Bell (1998), "Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion". Academy of Management Journal, 41(1): 96-107. https://doi.org/10.2307/256901
  32. He J., B. S. Butler and W. R. King. 2007. "Team Cognition: Development and Evolution in Software Project Teams". Journal of Managmement Information Systems, 24(2):261-292
  33. Heckathorn, D. D. (1997), "Respondent-driven sampling: a new approach to the study of hidden populations". Social problems: 174-199.
  34. Howard, A. (2001), "Software engineering project management". Commun. ACM, 44(5): 23-24. https://doi.org/10.1145/374308.374322
  35. Hutchins, E. (1991), "Organizing work by adaptation". Organization Science, 2(1): 14-39. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.14
  36. Hutt, M. D., P. H. Reingen and J. R. Ronchetto Jr. (1988), "Tracing emergent processes in marketing strategy formation". The Journal of Marketing: 4-19.
  37. Jehn, K. A., G. B. Northcraft and M. A. Neale (1999), "Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups". Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4): 741-763. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667054
  38. Jones, M. C. and A. W. Harrison. (1996), "IS project team performance: an empirical assessment". Information & management, 31(2): 57-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(96)01068-3
  39. Kamoche, K. and M. P. e Cunha (2001), "Minimal structures: From jazz improvisation to product innovation". Organization Studies, 22(5): 733-764. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840601225001
  40. Kang, H-R, H-D Yang, and C. Rowley (2006), "Factors in team effectiveness: Cognitive and demographic similarities of software development team members". Human Relations, 59(12): 1681-1710. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726706072891
  41. Karlsen, J. T., J. Andersen, L. S. Birkely and E. Odegard (2006). "An empirical study of critical success factors in IT projects". International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 3(4): 297-311. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMED.2006.009083
  42. Kearney, E. and D. Gebert (2009), "Managing diversity and enhancing team outcomes: the promise of transformational leadership". Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1): 77. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013077
  43. Kearney, E., D. Gebert and S. C. Voelpel (2009), "When and how diversity benefits teams: the importance of team members' need for cognition". Academy of Management Journal, 52(3): 581-598. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2009.41331431
  44. Keil, M., P. E. Cule, K. Lyytinen and R. C. Schmidt (1998), "A framework for identifying software project risks". Communications of the ACM, 41(11): 76-83. https://doi.org/10.1145/287831.287843
  45. Lee, G., W. DeLone and J. A. Espinosa (2006). "Ambidextrous coping strategies in globally distributed software development projects". Communications of the ACM, 49(10): 35-40. https://doi.org/10.1145/1164394.1164417
  46. Leybourne, S. and E. Sadler-Smith (2006), "The role of intuition and improvisation in project management". International Journal of Project Management, 24(6): 483-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.03.007
  47. Li, J. and D. C. Hambrick (2005), "Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams." Academy of Management Journal, 48(5): 794-813. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2005.18803923
  48. Liang, T.-P., J. Jiang, G. S. Klein and J.-C. Liu (2010), "Software quality as influenced by informational diversity, task conflict, and learning in project teams". Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 57(3): 477-487. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2009.2033049
  49. Liang, T.-P., C.-C. Liu, T.-M. Lin and B. Lin (2007), "Effect of team diversity on software project performance". Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(5): 636-653. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570710750408
  50. Liang, T.-P., J. C.-H. Wu, J. J. Jiang and G. Klein (2012), "The impact of value diversity on information system development projects". International Journal of Project Management, 30(6): 731-739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.11.006
  51. Lin, Z., H. Yang and I. Demirkan (2007), "The performance consequences of ambidexterity in strategic alliance formations: Empirical investigation and computational theorizing". Management Science, 53(10): 1645-1658. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0712
  52. Liu, J. Y.-C., H.-G. Chen, C. C. Chen and T. S. Sheu (2011), "Relationships among interpersonal conflict, requirements uncertainty, and software project performance". International Journal of Project Management, 29(5): 547-556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.04.007
  53. Lubatkin, M. H., Z. Simsek, Y. Ling and J. F. Veiga (2006), "Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration". Journal of Management, 32(5): 646-672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306290712
  54. Magni, M., L. Proserpio, M. Hoegl and B. Provera (2009), "The role of team behavioral integration and cohesion in shaping individual improvisation". Research Policy, 38(6): 1044-1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.03.004
  55. McClelland, G. H. and C. M. Judd (1993), "Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects". Psychological Bulletin, 114(2): 376.
  56. Miner, A. S., P. Bassof and C. Moorman (2001), "Organizational improvisation and learning: A field study". Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2): 304-337. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667089
  57. Mintzberg, H. and A. McHugh (1985), "Strategy formation in an adhocracy". Administrative Science Quarterly: 160-197.
  58. Mitchell, V. L. (2006), "Knowledge integration and information technology project performance". MIS Quarterly: 919-939.
  59. Moorman, C. and A. S. Miner. (1998), "The Convergence of Planning and Execution: Improvisation in New Product Development". Journal of Marketing, 62(3): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251740
  60. Napier, N. P., L. Mathiassen and D. Robey (2011), "Building contextual ambidexterity in a software company to improve firm-level coordination". European Journal of Information Systems, 20(6): 674-690. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2011.32
  61. Nidumolu, S. (1995), "The effect of coordination and uncertainty on software project performance: residual performance risk as an intervening variable". Information Systems Research, 6(3): 191-219. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.3.191
  62. Nonaka, I. (1991), "The knowledge-creating company". Harvard business review, 69(6): 96-104.
  63. Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi. (1997), "The knowledge-creating company".
  64. PMI (2008), A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, 4th ed. Project Management Institute, Newton Square, PA
  65. Parolia, N., S. Goodman, Y. Li and J. J. Jiang (2007), "Mediators between coordination and IS project performance". Information & management, 44(7): 635-645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2007.06.003
  66. Pina e Cunha, M., J. Vieira da Cunha and K. Kamoche (1999), "Organizational improvisation: What, when, how and why". International journal of management reviews, 1(3): 299-341. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2370.00017
  67. Rai, A., R. Patnayakuni and N. Seth (2006), "Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities". MIS Quarterly, 30(2): 225-246. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148729
  68. Raz, T., A. J. Shenhar and D. Dvir. (2002), "Risk management, project success, and technological uncertainty". R&D Management, 32(2): 101-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00243
  69. Rerup, C. and S. E. Center (2001), "Houston, we have a problem": Anticipation and improvisation as sources of organizational resilience. Snider Entrepreneurial Center, Wharton School.
  70. Salganik, M. J. and D. D. Heckathorn (2004), "Sampling and estimation in hidden populations using respondent-driven sampling". Sociological methodology, 34(1): 193-240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0081-1750.2004.00152.x
  71. Simsek, Z., J. F. Veiga, M. H. Lubatkin and R. N. Dino (2005), "Modeling the multilevel determinants of top management team behavioral integration". Academy of Management Journal, 48(1): 69-84. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2005.15993139
  72. Somech, A. and A. Drach-Zahavy (2013), "Translating Team Creativity to Innovation Implementation The Role of Team Composition and Climate for Innovation". Journal of Management, 39(3): 684-708. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310394187
  73. Teoh, S. Y., N. Wickramsinghe and S. L. Pan (2012), "A bricolage perspective on healthcare information systems design: an improvisation model". SIGMIS Database, 43(3): 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1145/2351848.2351852
  74. Tiwana, A. (2010), "Systems development ambidexterity: Explaining the complementary and substitutive roles of formal and informal controls". Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(2): 87-126. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222270203
  75. Trotter, M. J., P. M. Salmon and M. G. Lenne (2012), "Improvisation: theory, measures and known influencing factors". Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 14(5): 475-498. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2012.656153
  76. Turner, J. R. and R. A. Cochrane (1993), "Goals-and-methods matrix: coping with projects with ill defined goals and/or methods of achieving them". International Journal of Project Management, 11(2): 93-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(93)90017-H
  77. Ulaga, W. and A. Eggert (2006), "Value-based differentiation in business relationships: gaining and sustaining key supplier status". Journal of Marketing, 70(1): 119-136. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.2006.70.1.119
  78. Unger, L. S. and J. B. Kernan (1983), "On the meaning of leisure: An investigation of some determinants of the subjective experience". Journal of Consumer research.
  79. Van Knippenberg, D., C. K. De Dreu and A. C. Homan (2004), "Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda". Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6): 1008. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008
  80. Van Knippenberg, D. and M. C. Schippers (2007), "Work group diversity". Annu. Rev. Psychol., 58: 515-541. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085546
  81. Vendelo, M. T. (2009), "Improvisation and Learning in Organizations-An Opportunity for Future Empirical Research". Management Learning, 40(4): 449-456. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507609339684
  82. Vera, D. and M. Crossan (2005), "Improvisation and innovative performance in teams". Organization Science, 16(3): 203-224. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0126
  83. Vijayasarathy, L. and D. Turk (2008), "Agile Software Development: A survey of early adopters". Journal of Information Technology Management, 19(2): 1-8.
  84. Vinekar, V., C. W. Slinkman and S. Nerur (2006), "Can agile and traditional systems development approaches coexist? An ambidextrous view". Information Systems Management, 23(3): 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1201/1078.10580530/46108.23.3.20060601/93705.4
  85. Wallace, L. and M. Keil (2004), "Software project risks and their effect on outcomes". Communications of the ACM, 47(4): 68-73. https://doi.org/10.1145/975817.975819
  86. Wallace, L., M. Keil and A. Rai (2004a), "How software project risk affects project performance: An investigation of the dimensions of risk and an exploratory model*". Decision Sciences, 35(2): 289-321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.00117315.2004.02059.x
  87. Wallace, L., M. Keil and A. Rai. (2004b), "Understanding software project risk: a cluster analysis". Information & management, 42(1): 115-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.12.007
  88. Weick, K. E. (1993), "The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster". Administrative Science Quarterly: 628-652.
  89. White, A. S. (2006), "External disturbance control for software project management". International Journal of Project Management, 24(2): 127-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.07.002
  90. Williams, K. Y. and C. A. O'Reilly (1998), "Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research". Research in organizational behavior, 20: 77-140.
  91. Xia, W. and G. Lee (2004), "Grasping the complexity of IS development projects". Communications of the ACM, 47(5): 68-74. https://doi.org/10.1145/986213.986215

Cited by

  1. Identification of future signal based on the quantitative and qualitative text mining: a case study on ethical issues in artificial intelligence vol.52, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0582-8