DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Online-Based Local Government Image Typology: A Case Study on Jakarta Provincial Government Official YouTube Videos

  • Published : 2017.06.30

Abstract

The Jakarta Provincial Government utilizes the YouTube channel to interact with citizens and enhance transparency. The purpose of this study is to explore online perceptions of local government image perceived by online audiences through the YouTube platform. The concepts of organizational image and credibility in the political image are adapted to analyze online public perceptions on the Jakarta Provincial Government image. Using the video summarization approach on Three hundred and forty-six official YouTube videos, which were uploaded from 1 March 2016 to 31 May 2016, and content analysis of Eight thousand two hundred and thirty-seven comments, this study shows both political and bureaucratic image emerge concurrently in the Jakarta Provincial Government case. The typology model is proposed to describe and explain the four image variations that occurred in the case study. Practical recommendations are suggested to manage YouTube channel as one of the social media used in the local government context.

Keywords

References

  1. Anshori, M., Maurits, I., and Sulistyorini, T. (2014). Effect of Social Media on Website City Government in Indonesia. Achsan.Staff.Gunadarma.Ac.Id. Retrieved from http://achsan.staff.gunadarma.ac.id/Publications/files/2378/EFFECT_OF_SOCIAL.pdf
  2. Bannister, F. and Connolly, R. (2011) 'The trouble with transparency: A critical review of openness in e-government', Policy & Internet, 3(1), pp. 158-187. doi: 10.2202/1944-2866.1076.
  3. Barnett, M.L., Jermier, J.M. and Lafferty, B.A. (2006) 'Corporate reputation: The definitional landscape', Corporate Reputation Review, 9(1), pp. 26-38. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550012.
  4. Bertot, J.C., Jaeger, P.T. and Hansen, D. (2012) 'The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations', Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), pp. 30-40. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.004.
  5. Bonson, E., Torres, L., Royo, S. and Flores, F. (2012) 'Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities', Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), pp. 123-132. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2011.10.001.
  6. Carpenter, D. (2010a) 'Institutional strangulation: Bureaucratic politics and financial reform in the Obama administration', Perspectives on Politics, 8(03), pp. 825-846. doi: 10.1017/s1537592710002070.
  7. Carpenter, D.P. (2010b) Reputation and power: Organizational image and pharmaceutical regulation at the FDA. Princeton, NJ, United States: Princeton University Press.
  8. Carpenter, D.P. and Krause, G.A. (2011) 'Reputation and public administration', Public Administration Review, 72(1), pp. 26-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02506.x.
  9. Chatfield, A. T. and Brajawidagda, U. (2013) Political Will and Strategic Use of YouTube to Advancing Government Transparency: An Analysis of Jakarta Government-Generated YouTube Videos, the Proceedings of the 2013 IFIP E-Government
  10. Criado, J.I., Sandoval-Almazan, R. and Gil-Garcia, J.R. (2013) 'Government innovation through social media', Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), pp. 319-326. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.003.
  11. Dadashzadeh, M. (2010) 'Social media in government: From eGovernment to eGovernance', Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER), 8(11). doi: 10.19030/jber.v8i11.51.
  12. Dimitrova, D.V. and Bystrom, D. (2013) 'The effects of social media on political participation and candidate image evaluations in the 2012 Iowa caucuses', American Behavioral Scientist, 57(11), pp. 1568-1583. doi: 10.1177/0002764213489011.
  13. Ellison, N. and Hardey, M. (2013) 'DEVELOPING POLITICAL CONVERSATIONS?', Information, Communication & Society, 16(6), pp. 878-898. doi: 10.1080/1369118x.2012.740495.
  14. Ellison, N. and Hardey, M. (2014) 'Social media and local government: Citizenship, consumption and democracy', Local Government Studies, 40(1), pp. 21-40. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2013.799066.
  15. Fuchs, C. (2014) Social media: A critical introduction. London: SAGE Publications.
  16. Gandia, J.L., Marrahi, L. and Huguet, D. (2016) 'Digital transparency and web 2.0 in Spanish city councils', Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), pp. 28-39. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.12.004.
  17. Gilad, S., Maor, M. and Bloom, P.B. (2013) 'Organizational reputation, the content of public allegations, and regulatory communication', Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(2), pp. 451-478. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mut041.
  18. Gilpin, D. (2010) 'Organizational image construction in a fragmented online media environment', Journal of Public Relations Research, 22(3), pp. 265-287. doi: 10.1080/10627261003614393.
  19. Gioia, D.A., Schultz, M. and Corley, K.G. (2000) 'ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTITY, IMAGE, AND ADAPTIVE INSTABILITY', Academy of Management Review, 25(1), pp. 63-81. doi: 10.5465/amr.2000.2791603.
  20. Hand, L.C. and Ching, B.D. (2011) '"You have One friend request"', Administrative Theory & Praxis, 33(3), pp. 362-382. doi: 10.2753/atp1084-1806330303.
  21. Hanna, N. K., and Qiang, C. Z. (2009). National E-Government Institutions: Functions, Models, and Trends. Information and Communications for Development, 83-102. doi:10.1596/978-0-8213-7605-8
  22. Hansen, H.K., Christensen, L.T. and Flyverbom, M. (2015) 'Introduction: Logics of transparency in late modernity: Paradoxes, mediation and governance', European Journal of Social Theory, 18(2), pp. 117-131. doi: 10.1177/1368431014555254.
  23. Heald, D. (2006). Varieties of Transparency. Transparency: The Key to Better Governance?, 24-43. doi:10.5871/bacad/9780197263839.003.0002
  24. Hood, C. (2002) 'The risk game and the blame game', Government and Opposition, 37(1), pp. 15-37. doi: 10.1111/1477-7053.00085.
  25. Hood, C. (2011) The blame game: Spin, bureaucracy, and self-preservation in government. Princeton, NJ, United States: Princeton University Press.
  26. Kaigo, M. (2012). Social media usage during disasters and social capital: Twitter and the Great East Japan earthquake. Keio Communication Review, (34), 19-35. Retrieved from http://www.mediacom.keio.ac.jp/publication/pdf2012/KCR34_02KAIGO.pdf
  27. Kaplan, A.M. and Haenlein, M. (2010) 'Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media', Business Horizons, 53(1), pp. 59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003.
  28. Kavanaugh, A.L., Fox, E.A., Sheetz, S.D., Yang, S., Li, L.T., Shoemaker, D.J., Natsev, A. and Xie, L. (2012) 'Social media use by government: From the routine to the critical', Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), pp. 480-491. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.002.
  29. Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills. 25
  30. Landsbergen, D. (2010). Government as part of the revolution: Using social media to achieve public goals. Proceedings of the European Conference on E-Government, ECEG, 8(2), 243-250.
  31. Larsson, A. O. (2013). Bringing it all back home? Social media practices by Swedish municipalities. European Journal of Communication, 28(6), 681-695. doi:10.1177/0267323113502277
  32. Lev-On, A. and Steinfeld, N. (2015) 'Local engagement online: Municipal Facebook pages as hubs of interaction', Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), pp. 299-307. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.05.007.
  33. Li, Y., Lee, S.-H., Yeh, C.-H. and Kuo, C..J. (2006) 'Techniques for movie content analysis and skimming: Tutorial and overview on video abstraction techniques', IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 23(2), pp. 79-89. doi: 10.1109/msp.2006.1621451.
  34. Lin, Y.-R., Bagrow, J. P., & Lazer, D. (2011). More Voices than Ever? {Q}uantifying Bias in Social and Mainstream Media. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, (September 2015).
  35. Mainka, A., Hartmann, S., Stock, W. G., and Peters, I. (2014). Government and social media: A case study of 31 informational world cities. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1715-1724. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2014.219
  36. MAOR, M. (2010) 'Organizational reputation and jurisdictional claims: The case of the U.S. Food and drug administration', Governance, 23(1), pp. 133-159. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01470.x.
  37. MAOR, M. (2011) 'Organizational reputations and the Observability of public warnings in 10 pharmaceutical markets', Governance, 24(3), pp. 557-582. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2011.01536.x.
  38. Maor, M. Theories of Bureaucratic Reputation, in Waeraas, A and Maor, M. (eds.). (2015). Organizational reputation in the public sector, London: Routledge.
  39. Mccroskey, J. C., and Teven, J. J. (1999). Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement.Communication Monographs, 66, 90-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759909376464
  40. Meijer, A. J., Koops, B.-J., Pieterson, W., Overman, S., and Tije, S. Ten. (2012). Government 2 . 0 : Key Challenges to Its Realization. Electronic Journal of E-Government, 10(1), 59-69.
  41. Mergel, I. (2012). The social media innovation challenge in the public sector. Information Polity, 17(3-4), 281-292. doi:10.3233/IP-2012-000281
  42. Mergel, I. (2013). A framework for interpreting social media interactions in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 327-334. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.015
  43. Mergel, I. (2016). Social media institutionalization in the U.S. federal government. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 142-148. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2015.09.002
  44. Moss, G., Kennedy, H., Moshonas, S. and Birchall, C. (2015) 'Knowing your publics: The use of social media analytics in local government', Information Polity, 20(4), pp. 287-298. doi: 10.3233/ip-150376.
  45. Panagiotopoulos, P., Bigdeli, A.Z. and Sams, S. (2014) 'Citizen-government collaboration on social media: The case of Twitter in the 2011 riots in England', Government Information Quarterly, 31(3), pp. 349-357. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.014.
  46. Rho, E., Yun, T. and Lee, K. (2015) 'Does organizational image matter? Image, identification, and employee behaviors in public and nonprofit organizations', Public Administration Review, 75(3), pp. 421-431. doi: 10.1111/puar.12338.
  47. Robinson, S. (2007) '"SOMEONE'S GOTTA BE IN CONTROL HERE"', Journalism Practice, 1(3), pp. 305-321. doi: 10.1080/17512780701504856.
  48. Sobaci, M. Z. (2015). Social Media and Local Governments. SPringer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-17722-9
  49. Song, C. and Lee, J. (2015) 'Citizens' use of social media in government, perceived transparency, and trust in government', Public Performance & Management Review, 39(2), pp. 430-453. doi: 10.1080/15309576.2015.1108798.
  50. van Thiel, S., (2014). Research in public administration and public management: an introduction. London: Roudledge.
  51. Waeraas, A., and Byrkjeflot, H. (2012). Public Sector Organizations and Reputation Management: Five Problems. International Public Management Journal, 15(2), 186-206. doi:10.1080/10967494.2012.702590
  52. Yesilkagit, K. (2012) 'The blame game: Spin, bureaucracy, and self-preservation in government', West European Politics, 35(2), pp. 437-438. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2011.648483.
  53. Zavattaro, S.M., French, P.E. and Mohanty, S.D. (2015) 'A sentiment analysis of U.S. Local government tweets: The connection between tone and citizen involvement', Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), pp. 333-341. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.03.003.
  54. Zuydam, S. Van. (2014). Crediblity as a source of political capital: Exploring political leaders' performance from a credibility perspective. ECPR Join Sessions 2014 Workshop 15, 1-24.

Cited by

  1. Global mapping of artificial intelligence in Google and Google Scholar vol.113, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2534-4
  2. Identification of future signal based on the quantitative and qualitative text mining: a case study on ethical issues in artificial intelligence vol.52, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0582-8