한국항만경제학회지 (Journal of Korea Port Economic Association)

  • 제33권4호
  • /
  • Pages.37-58
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1225-3855(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2714-1330(eISSN)
한국항만경제학회 (The Korea Port Economic Association)
권호 표지

항만선택행위에 대한 탐색적 이차원적 접근

An Exploratory Two-dimensional Approach to Port Selection Behavior

  • 투고 : 2017.11.14
  • 심사 : 2017.12.27
  • 발행 : 2017.12.29
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

설문조사 및 응답자의 지각을 바탕으로 하는 항만선택연구의 암묵적인 가정은 항만선택속성들의 선호크기가 선택행위에 비례적이라는 것이다. 그러나 항만선택 속성들도 직선만이 아닌 비선형적 특성을 갖을 수 있다. 본 연구는 항만선택연구에 성격이 유사한 카노모형을 원용하여 항만선택속성의 비선형적 특성을 확인 하였다. 연구결과 선사의 항만선택속성들중 복합운송연계성과 항만규모 등이 당연특성으로 평가되는 등 여러 속성들이 비선형적 특성으로 평가되었다. 따라서 항만공사와 운영사 등의 항만 서비스제공자들은 선사들의 비선형적 항만선택특성을 반영한 항만운영전략을 구축해야 할 것이다. 본 연구가 항만선택 특성을 탐색적으로 분석하였기 때문에 추후 국내외 항만 및 이해당사자들을 대상으로 한 추가적인 검증연구가 필요하다. 또한 분석 및 전략수립에 활용한 카노모형 및 중요도 선택분석방법도 명확한 특성의 파악과 전략지침의 제시가 가능하도록 개선할 필요가 있다.

The implicit assumption of port selection studies based on survey and respondents' perceptions is that the preference of the port selection attributes is proportional to the selection behavior. Further, the straight lines of the port selection attributes could also have non-linear properties. This study confirms nonlinear characteristics of selection attributes by using Kano model. The findings of this study showed that several properties of carriers were evaluated as nonlinear characteristics, such as the intermodal links and network accessibility, and size of port and terminal. Hence, port service providers such as port authorities and terminal operating companiesl, should construct a port operation strategy that reflects the non-linear port selection characteristics of shipping companies. Since this study aimed at exploring the forms of port selection characteristics, long-term additional verification studies on ports and stakeholders at domestics and abroad were needed. The Kano model and importance-selection analysis method used for analysis and strategy establishment also need to be improved to capture evident characteristics and to present strategic guidelines.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 박병인.성숙경(2008), 컨테이너항만의 환적항 결정요인 분석, 한국항만경제학회지, 제24권 제1호, 41-60.
  2. 배종욱.박병인(2013), KANO모형을 이용한 컨테이너부두의 물류서비스 특성분석, 한국항만경제학회지, 제29권 제1호, 1-22.
  3. 윤승재(2017), 항만선택요인분석, 전남대학교 대학원 교통물류학과 석사학위논문.
  4. 임성욱.박영택(2010), KANO모델을 기반으로 한 잠재적 고객만족지수 개선, 품질경영학회지, 제38권 제2호, 248-260.
  5. Anderson, C. M., Opaluch, J. J., and Grigalunas, T. A. (2009), The demand for import services at US container ports, Maritime Economics and Logistics, 11(2), 156-185. https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2009.4
  6. Kano, N., Seraku, N., and Takahashi, F.(1984), Attractive quality and must-be quality, The Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control, 14(2), 39-48.
  7. Berger, C. et al. (1993), Kano's methods for understanding customer-defined quality, Center for Quality of Management Journal, 2(4), 2-36.
  8. Caillaux, M. A., Sant'Anna, A. P., and Meza, L. A. (2011), Container logistics in Mercosur: Choice of a transhipment port using the ordinal Copeland method, data envelopment analysis and probabilistic composition, Maritime Economics and Logistics, 13(4), 355-370. https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2011.20
  9. Chang, Y. T., Lee, S. Y., and Tongzon, J. L. (2008), Port selection factors by shipping lines: Different perspectives between trunk liners and feeder service providers. Marine Policy, 32(6), 877-885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2008.01.003
  10. Chou, C. C. (2010), AHP model for the container port choice in the multiple-ports region, Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 18(2), 211-232.
  11. da Cruz, M. R. P., Ferreira, J. J., and Azevedo, S. G. (2013), Key factors of seaport competitiveness based on the stakeholder perspective: An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) model, Maritime Economics and Logistics, 15(4), 416-443. https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2013.14
  12. Guy, E. and Urli, B. (2006), Port selection and multicriteria analysis: An application to the Montreal-New York alternative, Maritime Economics and Logistics, 8, 169-186. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100152
  13. Herzberg, F.(1968), One More Time: How Do You Motivate Employees?, Harvard Business Review, 46(1): 53-62.
  14. Lirn, T. C., Thanopoulou, H. A., and Beresford, A. K. (2003), Transhipment port selection and decision-making behaviour: Analysing the Taiwanese case, International Jounrnal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 6(4), 229.244. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675560310001626990
  15. Lirn, T. C., Thanopoulou, H. A., Beynon, M. J., and Beresford, A. K. C. (2004), An application of AHP on transhipment port selection: A global perspective, Maritime Economics and Logistics, 6(1), 70-91. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100093
  16. Martilla, J. A. and James, J.C.(1977), Importance-Performance Analysis, Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297704100112
  17. Martines, F. and Feo, M.(2017), Port Choice in Container Market : a Literature Review, Transport Reviews, 37(3), 300-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1231233
  18. Murphy, P. R., Daley, J. M., and Dalenberg, D. R. (1992), Port selection criteria: An application of a transportation research framework, Logistics and Transportation Review, 28(3), 237-255.
  19. Ng, A. S. F., Sun, D., and Bhattacharjya, J. (2013), Port choice of shipping lines and shippers in Australia, Asian Geographer, 30(2), 143-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/10225706.2013.783304
  20. Ng, K. Y. A. (2006), Assessing the attractiveness of ports in the North European container transhipment market: An agenda for future research in port competition, Maritime Economics and Logistics, 8, 234-250. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100158
  21. Park, B. I. and Min, H. (2011), The selection of transshipment ports using a hybrid data envelopment analysis/analytic hierarchy process, Journal of Transportation Management, 22(1), 47-64. https://doi.org/10.22237/jotm/1301616240
  22. Park, B. I. (2017), An Exploratory Two- Dimensional Approach to Port Choice Behavior Modeling, VI Meeting on International Economics, IEI, University of Jaume 1, Sep 27-29, Castellon, Spain.
  23. Park, B. I. and Min, H. (2014), Assessing the impact of port charges on ocean carriers' choice of vessel size, service routes, and service frequency, Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 15(2), 34-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2014.11517340
  24. Park, B. I, and Min, H. (2017), A game-theoretic approach to evaluating the competitiveness of container carriers in the Northeast Asian shipping market, Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 29(4), 854-869. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-09-2016-0163
  25. Rashia, M. M. (2010), A REVIEW OF STATE -OF-ARTON KANO MODEL FOR RESEARCH DIRECTION, International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 2(12), 7481-7490.
  26. Sauerwein, E., Bailom, F., Matzler, F., and Hinterhuber, H. H. (1996), THE KANO MODEL: HOW TO DELIGHT YOUR CUSTOMERS, Preprints Volume I of the IX. International Working Seminar on Production Economics, Innsbruck/Igls/Austria, February 19-23 1996, 313-327.
  27. Tai, H. H. and Hwang, C. C. (2005), Analysis of hubport choice for container trunk lines in East Asia, Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 6, 907-919.
  28. Tang, L. C., Low, J. M., and Lam, S. W. (2011), Understanding port choice behavior: a network perspective, Networks and Spatial Economics, 11(1), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-008-9081-8
  29. Tongzon, J. L. (2009), Port choice and freight forwarders, Transportation Research Part E, 45(1), 186-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2008.02.004
  30. Tongzon, J. L. and Sawant, L. (2007), Port choice in a competitive environment: From the shipping lines' perspective, Applied Economics, 39(4), 447-492.
  31. Veldman, S. J., and Bukmann, E. W. (2003), A model on container port competition: An application for the West European container Hub-ports, Maritime Economics and Logistics, 5, 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100058
  32. Wiegmans, B. W., Van Der Hoest, A., and Notteboom, T. E. (2008), Port and terminal selection by deepsea container operators, Maritime Policy and Management, 35(6), 517-534. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088830802469329
  33. Yeo, G. T., Roe, M., and Dinwoodie, J. (2008), Evaluating the competitiveness of container ports in Korea and China, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(6), 910-921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2008.01.014
  34. Yeo, G. T., Roe, M., and Dinwoodie, J. (2011), Measuring the competitiveness of container ports: Logisticians' perspectives, European Journal of Marketing, 45(3), 455-470. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561111107276
  35. Yuen, C. L. A., Zhang, A., and Cheung, W. (2012), Port competitiveness from the users' perspective: An analysis of major container ports in China and its neighboring countries, Research in Transportation Economics, 35(1), 34-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2011.11.005