DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study of Machinima and Fair Use Doctrine in MMORPGs

MMORPGs에서의 머시니마와 공정이용 원칙에 관한 연구

  • Suh, Kye-Won (Dept. of Law, College of Law, Dongguk University-Seoul)
  • Received : 2017.06.07
  • Accepted : 2017.06.07
  • Published : 2017.06.30

Abstract

Machinima is a new medium of artistic expression that allows creators to produce faster and cheaper 3D animated works than ever before. However, the software owner controls all rights in the game. The principle of fair use allows for limited use of works without permission of the copyright owner for certain purposes. The application of the principle of fair use to any particular machinima will depend on the specific circumstances. In conclusion, in order to maintain the balance between the copyright owner and the user, the reasonable role of the court in Korea seems to be more important in interpreting the fair use clause.

Keywords

References

  1. C. Reid, "Fair Game: The Application of Fair Use Doctrine to Machinima," Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainmnet Law Journal, Vol. 19, pp. 831-876, 2009.
  2. S.S. Oh and S.J. Park, "Game Fan-dom of Generative the Secondary Culture-Based On Machinima," Journal of the Korea Contents Association, Vol. 9, No. 11, pp. 130-139, 2009. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2009.9.11.130
  3. Y.J. Park, "A Study of Visual Media Scalability by Machinima in MMORPG," Journal of The Korean Society for Computer Game, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 105-111, 2012.
  4. J.H. Bae, "Serve-Side Automatic Code Conversion System for Game UCC Based Video Management," Journal of The Korean Society for Computer Game, No. 16, pp. 107-114, 2009.
  5. H.J. Lee, "UCC Copyrighg, Research About a New Paradigm," Proceeding of the Fall Conference of the Korea Multimedia Society, pp. 149-152, 2007.
  6. KOCCA, Fusion Contents of Games and Cinema: Machinima, In-depth Report of CT, 2012.
  7. Paul Marino, The Art of Machinima, Paraglyph Press, Phoenix, 2004.
  8. C.H. Jeong and M.J. Kim, "Comparative Analysis for Production Pipeline Between 3D Animation and Machinima," Journal of the Korea Entertainment Industry Association, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 313-321, 2016.
  9. D.E. Lee, "A Comparative Study for Digital Animation Production using Database," Journal of Korea Multimedia Society, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 96-105, 2008.
  10. Folsom v. Marsh, U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, Federal Cases, https://h2o. law.harvard.edu/cases/5238 (accessed May, 15, 2017).
  11. P.N. Leval, "Toward a Fair Use Standard," Harvard Law Review, Vol. 103, pp. 1105-1136, 1990. https://doi.org/10.2307/1341457
  12. Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., U.S. Reports, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/510/569/ (accessed May, 15, 2017).
  13. Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises, U.S. Reports, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/471/539/case.html (accessed May, 15, 2017).
  14. American Geophysical Union v. Texaco Inc., U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Federal Reporter , https://www.law.cornell.edu/copyright/cases/60_F3d_913.htm (accessed May, 15, 2017).
  15. K.W. Suh, "An Empirical Study on Adoption of Fair Use to Copyright Law in Korea," Law Review, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 159-192, 2010.
  16. S.J. Jeong and J.S. Park, Intellectual Property, Hongmoonsa, Seoul, 2011.
  17. Leibovitz v. Paramount Pictures Corp., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Federal Reporter, https://h2o.law.harvard.edu/cases/5152 (accessed May, 15, 2017).
  18. MasterCard Intern. Inc. v. Nader 2000 Primary Committee, Inc., U.S. District Court for the S.D. New York, United States Patents Quarterly, https://h2o.law. harvard.edu/cases/5161 (accessed May, 15, 2017).
  19. Triangle Publications, Inc. v. Knight-Ridder Newspapers, Inc., U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, Federal Reporter , https://h2o.law.harvard.edu/cases/5207 (accessed May, 15, 2017).
  20. National Business Lists, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Federal Reporthttp://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/552/89/1525794/ (accessed May, 15, 2017).
  21. Bridge Publications, Inc. v. Vien, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, Federal Reporter , http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/827/629/1458675/ (accessed May, 15, 2017).
  22. Supreme Court Decision, http://glaw.scourt.go.kr/wsjo/intesrch/sjo030.do?q=2005%EB%8F%847783&tabGbnCd=#1496731568850 (accessed May, 15, 2017).
  23. Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v. General Signal Corp., U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Federal Reporter , http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellatecourts/F2/730/47/345291/ (accessed May, 15, 2017).