Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Bonding of the silane containing multi-mode universal adhesive for lithium disilicate ceramics

  • Lee, Hyun-Young (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Seoul National University School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute) ;
  • Han, Geum-Jun (Department of Dental Biomaterials Science, Seoul National University School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute) ;
  • Chang, Juhea (Special Care Clinic, Seoul National University Dental Hospital) ;
  • Son, Ho-Hyun (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Seoul National University School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute)
  • Received : 2016.07.11
  • Accepted : 2016.12.06
  • Published : 2017.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluated the influence of a multi-mode universal adhesive (MUA) containing silane (Single Bond Universal, 3M EPSE) on the bonding of resin cement to lithium disilicate. Materials and Methods: Thirty IPS e.max CAD specimens (Ivoclar Vivadent) were fabricated. The surfaces were treated as follows: Group A, adhesive that did not contain silane (ANS, Porcelain Bonding Resin, Bisco); Group B, silane (S) and ANS; Group C, hydrofluoric acid (HF), S, and ANS; Group D, MUA; Group E, HF and MUA. Dual-cure resin cement (NX3, Kerr) was applied and composite resin cylinders of 0.8 mm in diameter were placed on it before light polymerization. Bonded specimens were stored in water for 24 hours or underwent a 10,000 thermocycling process prior to microshear bond strength testing. The data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance (p < 0.05). Results: Bond strength varied significantly among the groups (p < 0.05), except for Groups A and D. Group C showed the highest initial bond strength ($27.1{\pm}6.9MPa$), followed by Group E, Group B, Group D, and Group A. Thermocycling significantly reduced bond strength in Groups B, C, and E (p < 0.05). Bond strength in Group C was the highest regardless of the storage conditions (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Surface treatment of lithium disilicate using HF and silane increased the bond strength of resin cement. However, after thermocycling, the silane in MUA did not help achieve durable bond strength between lithium disilicate and resin cement, even when HF was applied.

Keywords

References

  1. Bergmann CP, Stumpf A. Dental ceramics: microstructure, properties and degradation. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media; 2013. Chapter 1.
  2. Rosenblum MA, Schulman A. A review of all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128:297-307. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1997.0193
  3. Zhang Y, Lee JJ, Srikanth R, Lawn BR. Edge chipping and flexural resistance of monolithic ceramics. Dent Mater 2013;29:1201-1208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.09.004
  4. Tysowsky GW. The science behind lithium disilicate: a metal-free alternative. Dent Today 2009;28:112-113.
  5. Gorodovsky S, Zidan O. Retentive strength, disintegration, and marginal quality of luting cements. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:269-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90328-8
  6. El-Mowafy O. The use of resin cements in restorative dentistry to overcome retention problems. J Can Dent Assoc 2001;67:97-102.
  7. Rosentritt M, Behr M, Lang R, Handel G. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays. Dent Mater 2004;20:463-469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.05.004
  8. Alber FE, El-Mowafy OM. Marginal adaptation and microleakage of Procera AllCeram crowns with four cements. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:529-535.
  9. Sorensen JA, Kang SK, Avera SP. Porcelain-composite interface microleakage with various porcelain surface treatments. Dent Mater 1991;7:118-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(91)90057-6
  10. Jensen ME, Sheth JJ, Tolliver D. Etched-porcelain resinbonded full veneer crowns: in vitro fracture resistance. Compendium 1989;10:336-347.
  11. Nagai T, Kawamoto Y, Kakehashi Y, Matsumura H. Adhesive bonding of a lithium disilicate ceramic material with resin-based luting agents. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:598-605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01464.x
  12. Filho AM, Vieira LC, Araujo E, Monteiro Junior S. Effect of different ceramic surface treatments on resin microtensile bond strength. J Prosthodont 2004;13:28-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2004.04007.x
  13. Menees TS, Lawson NC, Beck PR, Burgess JO. Influence of particle abrasion or hydrofluoric acid etching on lithium disilicate flexural strength. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1164-1170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.021
  14. Kang SH, Chang J, Son HH. Flexural strength and microstructure of two lithium disilicate glass ceramics for CAD/CAM restoration in the dental clinic. Restor Dent Endod 2013;38:134-140. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.3.134
  15. Della Bona A, Shen C, Anusavice KJ. Work of adhesion of resin on treated lithia disilicate-based ceramic. Dent Mater 2004;20:338-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00126-X
  16. Alex G. Preparing porcelain surfaces for optimal bonding. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2008;29:324-335.
  17. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003;28:215-235.
  18. Kadoma Y. Surface treatment agent for dental metals using a thiirane monomer and a phosphoric acid monomer. Dent Mater J 2002;21:156-169. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.21.156
  19. Chen L, Suh BI, Brown D, Chen X. Bonding of primed zirconia ceramics: evidence of chemical bonding and improved bond strengths. Am J Dent 2012;25:103-108.
  20. Fukegawa D, Hayakawa S, Yoshida Y, Suzuki K, Osaka A, Van Meerbeek B. Chemical interaction of phosphoric acid ester with hydroxyapatite. J Dent Res 2006;85:941-944. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910608501014
  21. Alex G. Universal adhesives: the next evolution in adhesive dentistry? Compend Contin Educ Dent 2015;36:15-26.
  22. Suzuki T, Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Endo H, Erickson RL, Latta MA, Miyazaki M. Influence of etching mode on enamel bond durability of universal adhesive systems. Oper Dent 2016;41:520-530. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-347-L
  23. Sai K, Shimamura Y, Takamizawa T, Tsujimoto A, Imai A, Endo H, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA, Miyazaki M. Influence of degradation conditions on dentin bonding durability of three universal adhesives. J Dent 2016;54:56-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.09.004
  24. Passia N, Mitsias M, Lehmann F, Kern M. Bond strength of a new generation of universal bonding systems to zirconia ceramic. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2016;62:268-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.04.045
  25. Kim JH, Chae SY, Lee Y, Han GJ, Cho BH. Effects of multipurpose, universal adhesives on resin bonding to zirconia ceramic. Oper Dent 2015;40:55-62. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-303-L
  26. Kalavacharla VK, Lawson NC, Ramp LC, Burgess JO. Influence of etching protocol and silane treatment with a universal adhesive on lithium disilicate bond strength. Oper Dent 2015;40:372-378. https://doi.org/10.2341/14-116-L
  27. Han GJ, Chung SN, Chun BH, Kim CK, Oh KH, Cho BH. Effect of the applied power of atmospheric pressure plasma on the adhesion of composite resin to dental ceramic. J Adhes Dent 2012;14:461-469.
  28. Braga RR, Meira JB, Boaro LC, Xavier TA. Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of 'macro' test methods. Dent Mater 2010;26:e38-e49.
  29. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Nakajima M, Yoshiyama M, Shono Y, Fernandes CA, Tay F. The microtensile bond test: a review. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:299-309.
  30. Armstrong S, Geraldeli S, Maia R, Raposo LH, Soares CJ, Yamagawa J. Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of 'micro' bond strength test methods. Dent Mater 2010;26:e50-e62.
  31. Kim JH, Chae S, Lee Y, Han GJ, Cho BH. Comparison of shear test methods for evaluating the bond strength of resin cement to zirconia ceramic. Acta Odontol Scand 2014;72:745-752. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2014.903516
  32. Arkles B, Steinmetz JR, Zazyczny J, Mehta P. Factors contributing to the stability of alkoxysilanes in aqueous solution. J Adhes Sci Technol 1992;6:193-206. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856192X00133
  33. Brochier Salon MC, Bayle PA, Abdelmouleh M, Boufi S, Belgacem MN. Kinetics of hydrolysis and self condensation reactions of silanes by NMR spectroscopy. Coll Surf Physicochem Eng Asp 2008;312:83-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2007.06.028
  34. Lung CY, Matinlinna JP. Aspects of silane coupling agents and surface conditioning in dentistry: an overview. Dent Mater 2012;28:467-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.02.009
  35. Zaghloul H, Elkassas DW, Haridy MF. Effect of incorporation of silane in the bonding agent on the repair potential of machinable esthetic blocks. Eur J Dent 2014;8:44-52. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.126240
  36. Fox MA, Whitesell JK. Organic chemistry. 3rd ed. Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2004. Chapter 16.
  37. Pashley EL, Zhang Y, Lockwood PE, Rueggeberg FA, Pashley DH. Effects of HEMA on water evaporation from water-HEMA mixtures. Dent Mater 1998;14:6-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(98)00003-7
  38. Guarda GB, Correr AB, Goncalves LS, Costa AR, Borges GA, Sinhoreti MA, Correr-Sobrinho L. Effects of surface treatments, thermocycling, and cyclic loading on the bond strength of a resin cement bonded to a lithium disilicate glass ceramic. Oper Dent 2013;38:208-217. https://doi.org/10.2341/11-076-L
  39. Borges GA, Sophr AM, De Goes MF, Sobrinho LC, Chan DC. Effect of etching and airborne particle abrasion on the microstructure of different dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:479-488. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(02)52704-9
  40. Lise DP, Perdigao J, Van Ende A, Zidan O, Lopes GC. Microshear bond strength of resin cements to lithium disilicate substrates as a function of surface preparation. Oper Dent 2015;40:524-532. https://doi.org/10.2341/14-240-L
  41. Isolan CP, Valente LL, Munchow EA, Basso GR, Pimentel AH, Schwantz JK, da Silva AV, Moraes RR. Bond strength of a universal bonding agent and other contemporary dental adhesives applied on enamel, dentin, composite, and porcelain. Appl Adhes Sci 2014;2:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-4351-2-1
  42. El Zohairy AA, De Gee AJ, Hassan FM, Feilzer AJ. The effect of adhesives with various degrees of hydrophilicity on resin ceramic bond durability. Dent Mater 2004;20:778-787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.05.010
  43. Kato H, Matsumura H, Tanaka T, Atsuta M. Bond strength and durability of porcelain bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:163-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90094-3
  44. Wolf DM, Powers JM, O'keefe KL. Bond strength of composite to porcelain treated with new porcelain repair agents. Dent Mater 1992;8:158-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(92)90074-M
  45. Diaz-Arnold AM, Aquilino SA. An evaluation of the bond strengths of four organosilane materials in response to thermal stress. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:257-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90327-2
  46. Seo B. Principles of adhesion dentistry. 1st ed. Newtown: AEGIS Publications; 2013. Chapter 1.
  47. Takahashi M, Nakajima M, Hosaka K, Ikeda M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Long-term evaluation of water sorption and ultimate tensile strength of HEMA-containing/-free one-step self-etch adhesives. J Dent 2011;39:506-512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.04.008

Cited by

  1. Microtensile bond strengths of adhesively bonded polymer-based CAD/CAM materials to dentin pp.1881-1361, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2017-442
  2. Effects of surface treatments on repair bond strength of a new CAD/CAM ZLS glass ceramic and two different types of CAD/CAM ceramics vol.60, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.17-0109
  3. An in vitro evaluation of fracture load of implant-supported zirconia-based prostheses fabricated with different veneer materials vol.29, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13135
  4. Simplified Surface Treatments for Ceramic Cementation: Use of Universal Adhesive and Self-Etching Ceramic Primer vol.2018, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2598073
  5. Bonding Strength of Universal Adhesives to Indirect Substrates: A Meta‐Analysis of in Vitro Studies vol.29, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13147
  6. The effect of different ceramic surface treatments on the repair bond strength of resin composite to lithium disilicate ceramic vol.40, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2020-362
  7. Effect of Silane-Containing Universal Adhesives on the Bonding Strength of Lithium Disilicate vol.14, pp.14, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14143976
  8. Ceramics in dentistry: which material is appropriate for the anterior or posterior Dentition? Part 1: materials science vol.48, pp.8, 2021, https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2021.48.8.680