한국초지조사료학회지 (Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science)

  • 제37권1호
  • /
  • Pages.50-55
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 2287-5824(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-5832(eISSN)
한국초지조사료학회 (The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Enhancing Yield and Nutritive Value of Forage for Livestock Feeding Through Corn Soybean Intercropping Strategy with Several Pre-sowing Soybean Seed Coatings

  • Kim, Jeongtae (Department of Animal Science, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Song, Yowook (Department of Animal Science, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, Dong Woo (Department of Animal Science, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Fiaz, Muhammad (Department of Livestock Production & Management, Arid Agriculture University) ;
  • Kwon, Chan Ho (Department of Animal Science, Kyungpook National University)
  • 투고 : 2017.01.26
  • 심사 : 2017.03.21
  • 발행 : 2017.03.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In attempt to avoid crop damage through wild bird's picking, this study was designed with aim to evaluate several pre-sowing soybean seed coatings for optimum yield in corn-soybean mixed forage. It was investigated under four cropping treatments, viz. 1) corn sole, 2) corn mixed with soybean without any coating, 3) corn with iron coated soybean and 4) corn with thiram coated soybean. Each treatment had three replicates and corn sole was control treatment. Pioneer (P1184) and crossbred ($PI483463{\times}Hutcheson$) seeds were used for corn and soybean, respectively. The trial was conducted under randomized block design from $5^{th}$ June to $23^{rd}$ September, 2015. Data were an alyzed through ANOVA technique using SAS9.1.3 software. Results depicted that survivability of soybean against wild birds damage was found better (p<0.05) in thiram coating which was higher than iron coating and control treatment but later on thiram coating had adverse effects on subsequent growth of soybean plants. Corn stalk height was decreased (p<0.05) in thiram coating, whereas corn ear height was reduced in iron coating treatment. Iron coating enhanced (p<0.05) height of soybean plant (p<0.05) better than that of thiram coating. Soybean seed coatings didn't influence dry matter yield and nutritive value in terms of total digestible nutrients yield in corn soybean mixed forage. Conclusively, although presowing thiram coating enhanced survivability of soybean plants against wild bird damage but had adverse effects on its subsequent growth. However, soybean seed coatings didn't influence yield and nutritive value of corn soybean intercropping forage.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Andres, J.A., Correa, N.S. and Rosas, S.B. 1998. Alfalfa and soybean seed and root exudates treated with thiram inhibit the expression of rhizobia nodulation genes. Phyton. (Vincente Lopez), 62: 47-53.
  2. Avery, M.L., Pavelka, M.A., Bergman, D.L., Decker, D.G., Knittle, C.E. and Linz, G.M. 1995. Aversive conditioning to reduce raven predation on California least tern eggs. Journal of the Colonial Waterbird Society, 18: 131-138.
  3. Avery, M.L. and Decker, D.G. 1991. Repellency of fungicidal rice seed treatments to red-winged blackbirds. Journal of Wildlife Management., 55: 327-334. https://doi.org/10.2307/3809159
  4. Awal, M.A., Koshi, H. and Ikeda, T. 2006. Radiation interception and use by maize peanut intercrop canopy. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 139: 74-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.06.001
  5. Baglou, R., Sedghi, S.M., Shishevan, M.T.B. and Sharifi, RS. 2010. Effects of nano-iron oxide particles on agronomic traits of soybean. Notulae Scientia Biologicae., 2 (2): 112-113. https://doi.org/10.15835/nsb224667
  6. Bays, R., Baudet, L., Henning, A.A. and Filho, O. L. 2007. Recobrimento de sementes de soja com micronutrientes, fungicida e polimero. Revista Brasileira de Sementes, 29(2): 60-67. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31222007000200009
  7. Bruggers, R.L., Rodriguez, E. and Zaccagnini, M.E. 1998. Planning for bird pest problem resolution: A case study. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation., 42: 173-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-8305(98)00046-8
  8. Brzezinski, C.R., Henning, A.A., Abati, J., Henning, F.A., Franca-Neto, J.B., Krzyzanowski F.C. and Zucareli, C. 2015. Seeds treatment times in the establishment and yield performance of soybean crops. Journal of Seed Science., 37 (2): 147-153. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1545v37n2148363
  9. Chung, S.H., Lee, J.S., Kim M.J. and Lee, H.G. 2014. The development status and prospect of Korean Livestock Industry. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances., 13 (20): 1143-1149.
  10. Falloon, R.E. 1980. Seedling emergence responses in ryegrasses to fungicide seed treatments. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research., 23(3): 385-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.1980.10425372
  11. Korean Statistics (KOSTAT). Agriculture area survey in 2015 (According to Remote Sensing), the statistics Korea, Ministry of strategy and finance, Republic of Korea. http://kostat.go.kr/portal/eng/survey Outline/1/1/index.static. Accessed in September, 2016.
  12. Latati, M., Pansu, M., Drevon J.J. and Ounane S.M. 2013. Advantage of intercropping maize (Zea mays L.) and common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) on yield and nitrogen uptake in Northeast Algeria. International Journal of Research in Applied Sciences. Sci. 01: 1-7.
  13. Li, L., Sun, J., Zhang, F., Li, X., Yang, S. and Rengel, Z. 2001. Wheat/Maize or wheat/soybean strip intercropping I. yield advantage and inter specific interactions on nutrients. Field Crop Research., 71: 123-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(01)00156-3
  14. Lopez-Antia, A., Ortiz-Santaliestra, M. E. and Mateo, R.2014. Experimental approaches to test pesticide-treated seed avoidance by birds under a simulated diversification of food sources. Science of The Total Environment. 496:179-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.07.031
  15. National Forage Testing Association (NFTA). 2016. Forage analysis procedures, the National Forage Testing Association. http://www.foragetesting.org/index.php?page=lab_procedures, Accessed June, 2016.
  16. Ngo, Q.B., Dao, T.H., Nguyen, H.C., Tran, X.T., Nguyen, T.V., Khuu, T.D. and Hyunh, T.H. 2014. Effects of nano-crystalline powders (Fe, Co and Cu) on the germination, growth, crop yield and product quality of soybean (Vietnamese species DT-51). Advances in Natural Science: Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 5(1): pp7.
  17. Pereira, C.E., Oliveira, J.A., Oliveira, G.E., Rosa, M.C. M. and Neto, J.C. 2009. Fungicide treatment by film coating and soybean seed inoculation with Brady rhizobium. Revista Ciencia Agronomica., Fortaleza, 40(3): 433-440.
  18. Sandhu, P.S., Dhindsa, M.S. and Toor, H.S. 1987. Evaluation of methio-carb and thiram as seed treatments for protecting sprouting maize from birds in Punjab (India). Tropical Pest Management. 33: 370-372. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670878709371186
  19. Seo, J.D., Chae, J.H., Park, J.H., Kim, M.S., Kwon, C.H., and Lee, J.D. 2014. Yield and quality of forage produced by mixed planting of soybean and corn. Current Research on Agriculture and Life Sciences. 32: 105-109. https://doi.org/10.14518/crals.2014.32.2.015
  20. Steel, R.G.R., Torrie, J.H. and Dickey, D.A. 1997. Principles and procedures of statistics. A biochemical approach 3rd. Ed. McGraw Hill Book Co. Inc. NY, USA.
  21. Tsubo, M. and Walker, S. 2002. A model of radiation interception and use by a maize-bean intercrop canopy. Agriculture and Forest Meteorology. 110: 203-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(01)00287-8
  22. Usha, T.N. and Dadlani, M. 2014. Enhancement of planting value and storage performance of different cultivars with various germinabality of soybean (Glycine max) seed by pretreatment. Legume Research., 37 (5): 467-472. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-0571.2014.00661.4
  23. Van-Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B. and Lewis, B.A. 1991. Methods fordietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science., 74:3583-3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
  24. Zhang, Y., Liu, J., Zhang, J., Liu, H., Liu, S. and Zhai, L. 2015. Row ratios of intercropping maize and soybean can affect agronomic efficiency of the system and subsequent wheat. PLoS ONE 10(6): e0129245. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0129245.