Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science (한국비블리아학회지)

Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science (한국비블리아학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Plan for the Display of RDA Resource Types

RDA 자원유형 디스플레이 방안에 관한 연구

  • 이미화 (공주대학교 사범대학 문헌정보교육과)
  • Received : 2017.02.14
  • Accepted : 2017.03.11
  • Published : 2017.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was to suggest display of RDA resource type in OPAC efficiently. Literature reviews and users test and preference survey were used as research methods. The 4 ways for the display of RDA resource type were suggested. First, GMD and the resource type code(bcode2) invented by library itself as well as leader/06, 007, and 008 field should be used for converting AACR2 resource type to RDA resource type in the bibliographic records. Second, RDA resource type vocabularies applicable to Korean cataloging environment should be designed and described in 33X subfield ${\blacktriangledown}9$ and detailed resource terms described in 34X should be also expressed in OPAC. Third, two option is suggested as content type and carrier type display separately and as content type and carrier type combination. Fourth, 336, 338 filed, leader/07 bibliographic level, 008/30-31 Literary text for sound recordings, 34X field were useful to develop user centered resource type icon. This study would be able to increase the utilization of RDA resource types and help the users to understand the RDA resource type in OPAC.

본 연구는 온라인목록에서 효율적으로 RDA 자원유형 디스플레이 방안을 마련하기 위한 것이다. 연구방법으로는 문헌조사 및 RDA 자원유형 테스트 및 선호도 설문조사를 실시하였다. RDA 자원유형 디스플레이를 위한 방안으로 첫째, 기존 자원유형에서 RDA 자원유형으로 데이터 변환이 필요하며, 이를 위해 GMD 및 자체 자원유형코드를 사용하여 변환하되, 리더/06, 007, 008 태그의 정보를 사용하여 변환하는 방안을 제안하였다. 둘째, 한국의 목록규칙 환경에 맞게 RDA 자원유형 용어의 변경과 이를 33X 서브필드 ${\blacktriangledown}9$에 기술하고, 구체적인 자원유형을 표현하기 위해 34X 태그를 디스플레이하는 것을 제안하였다. 셋째, 내용유형, 수록매체유형을 각각 개별적으로 표현하는 방법과 통합하여 디스플레이하는 방식을 제시하였다. 넷째, 이용자 측면에서 자원유형 아이콘 개발을 위해 336, 338 태그의 정보를 바탕으로 리더/07 서지수준의 정보, 008/30-31 녹음자료의 내용, 34X의 정보를 활용할 것을 제안하였다. 본 연구에서 제시한 RDA 자원유형의 디스플레이 방안은 온라인목록에서 RDA 자원유형의 활용가능성을 증대시키고, 이용자에게 자원유형의 이해를 증대시킬 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. 국립중앙도서관. 2014. 한국문헌자동화목록형식 [online]. [cited 2016.10.23]. . (National Library of Korea. 2014. KORMARC [online]. [cited 2016.10.23]. .)
  2. 이미화. 2011. RDA 자원유형의 KCR4 적용에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 28(3): 103-121. (Lee, M. 2011. "A Study on Application of Resource Types of RDA to KCR4." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(3): 103-121.) https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.3.103
  3. 이미화. 2016. RDA 자원유형 디스플레이를 위한 고려사항에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 33(1): 33-52. (Lee, M. 2016. "A Study on the Display Considerations of RDA Resource Type." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 33(1): 33-52.) https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2016.33.1.033
  4. Attig, J. 2013. Categorization of Content and Carrier [online]. [cited 2016.10.23]. .
  5. Blythe, K. C., W. K. Gunther, and K. M. Spurgin. 2013. "Resource Description and Access: It's Really Not So Bad." Serials Review, 39(3): 175-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2013.10766389
  6. Carlyle, A. 1999. "User Categorisation of Works: Toward Improved Organisation of Online Catalogue Displays." Journal of Documentation, 55(2): 184-208. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007143
  7. Caudle, D. M. and C. Schmitz. 2014. "Keep It Simple: Using RDA's Content, Media, and Carrier Type Fields to Simplify Format Display Issues." Journal of Library Metadata, 14(3/4): 222-238. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2014.984572
  8. Cronin, C. 2011. "From Testing to Implementation: Managing Full-scale RDA Adoption at the University of Chicago." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 49(7/8): 626-646. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2011.616263
  9. GMD/SMD Working Group. 2006. Content and Carrier Terms in RDA [online]. [cited 2016.10.23]. .
  10. Guajardo, R. and J. Carlstone. 2015. "Converting Your E-resource Records to RDA." The Serials Librarian, 68(1/4): 197-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2015.1025654
  11. Hider, P. and A. Huthwaite. 2006. "The Potential Impact of RDA on OPAC Displays." In Proceedings of beyond the OPAC: Future Directions for Web-based Catalogues: Australian Committee on Cataloging Seminar, Perth, Australia, 18 Sept [online]. [cited 2016.10.23]. .
  12. Hider, P. 2009a. "A Comparison between the RDA Taxonomies and End-user Categorizations of Content and Carrier." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47(6): 544-560. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639370902929755
  13. Hider, P. 2009b. "Library Resource Categories and Their Possible Groupings." Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 40(2): 105-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2009.10721389
  14. McCutcheon, S. and R. S. Panchyshyn. 2012. "Innovative Millennium RDA Display Issues: MARC Tags 264 and 336-338." In Paper Presented at EGL IUG, Akron, OH [online]. [cited 2016.10.23]. .
  15. McCutcheon, S. 2012. "RDA and the Reference Librarian: What to Expect from the New Cataloging Standard." Reference Librarian, 53(2): 123-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763877.2011.607409
  16. Panchyshyn, R. S. 2014. "RDA display and the General Material Designation: An Innovative Solution." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 52(5): 487-505. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2014.902893
  17. Rochkind, J. 2012. On Form/Format/Media/Content/Carrier and RDA [online]. [cited 2016.10.23]. .