DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Strategy for Development of HSE Management Framework for Offshore CCS Project in Korea

국내 해양 CCS 사업의 HSE 관리 프레임워크 구축 전략

  • Noh, Hyonjeong (Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering, Technology Center for Offshore Plant Industries) ;
  • Kang, Kwangu (Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering, Technology Center for Offshore Plant Industries) ;
  • Kang, Seong-Gil (Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering, Technology Center for Offshore Plant Industries) ;
  • Lee, Jong-Gap (Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering, Technology Center for Offshore Plant Industries)
  • 노현정 (한국해양과학기술원 부설 선박해양플랜트연구소, 해양플랜트산업기술센터) ;
  • 강관구 (한국해양과학기술원 부설 선박해양플랜트연구소, 해양플랜트산업기술센터) ;
  • 강성길 (한국해양과학기술원 부설 선박해양플랜트연구소, 해양플랜트산업기술센터) ;
  • 이종갑 (한국해양과학기술원 부설 선박해양플랜트연구소, 해양플랜트산업기술센터)
  • Received : 2016.11.21
  • Accepted : 2017.02.14
  • Published : 2017.02.25

Abstract

Korea is preparing an offshore carbon capture, transport and storage (CCS) demonstration project which is recognized as one of important $CO_2$ reduction technologies to mitigate climate change. The offshore CCS project aims to transport, inject and store large amount of $CO_2$ into offshore geologic formation, and has a potential risk of leakage which might cause disastrous damage to human health, environment and property. Therefore, in order to ensure the safety of the offshore CCS project, a strict HSE (health, safety and environment) management plan and its implementation are required throughout the project life cycle. However, there are no HSE domestic laws or regulations applicable to CCS projects, and the related research is insufficient in Korea. For the derivation of the essential and urgent requirement in HSE management framework applicable to the offshore CCS project in Korea, we analysed the HSE management methodologies and foreign CCS HSE management guidelines and cases. First, this paper has analyzed ISO 31000, a generalized risk management principles. Second, we have investigated the HSE management practices of CCS projects in Norway and UK. Based on the analyses, we suggested the necessity of developing the HSE Philosophy and the HSE management process through the whole life cycle. Application of HSE management in early phase of an offshore CCS project will promote systematic and successful project implementation in a cost-effective and safe way.

지구온난화를 방지하기 위해 대량의 $CO_2$를 감축 시킬 수 있는 해양 CCS(Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage) 실증 및 상용화를 국내에서 준비 중이다. 해양 CCS 사업은 해양내 심부 퇴적층을 대상으로 대규모 $CO_2$를 수송, 주입, 저장하는 기술로써, 누출 등의 사고 발생 시 인명, 환경, 재산 등에 큰 피해를 야기할 잠재적 가능성을 가지고 있다. 따라서 해양 CCS 사업 안전성을 확보하기 위해서는 생애주기에 걸쳐서 유 가스 생산 해양플랜트에 준하는 엄격한 HSE(Health, Safety and Environment) 관리 방안이 요구된다. 하지만 국내에는 CCS 사업에 적용 가능한 HSE 법 또는 규정이 없을 뿐만 아니라 관련 연구도 미비한 상황이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 국외 해양플랜트 관련 HSE 관리 방법론, 해양 CCS HSE 관리 가이드라인 및 국외 사례를 분석하고, 이를 통하여 국내에서 해양 CCS를 추진시 HSE 관리 프레임워크 구축에 필요한 요구사항을 도출하였다. 이를 위해 본 연구에서는 먼저 범용적으로 활용되는 위험 관리방법론인 ISO 31000에 대한 분석을 수행하였다. 또한 해양플랜트 HSE 관리체계를 체계적으로 구축 운영 중인 노르웨이와 영국의 해양 CCS HSE 관리가이드라인 및 적용사례를 각각 분석하였다. 이를토대로 국내에서 해양 CCS 사업 추진시 HSE 관리 프레임워크 구축을 위해 우선적으로 수행해야할 사항으로 HSE Philosophy의 작성의 필요성을 피력하였고 생애주기 단계에 따른 HSE 관리 프로세스를 제안하였다. 본 논문에서 제안한 HSE 관리 프레임워크를 통해 국내 해양 CCS 실증 사업 추진시 기획 설계 단계부터 HSE 관리를 한다면 보다 안전하고 체계적인 사업을 이행할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. DNV, 2013, CO2RISKMAN Guidance on CCS $CO_2$ Safety and Environment Major Accident Hazard Risk Management Level 1-4.
  2. GCCSI, 2014, The Global Status of CCS: 2014.
  3. Greengrowth, 2010, National Plan for CCS Deployment in Korea.
  4. IEA, 2015, Energy Technology Perspectives 2015.
  5. IPCC, 2005, Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage.
  6. ISO, 2000, 17776 Petroleum and natural gas industries - Offshore production installations - Guidelines on tools and techniques for hazard identification and risk assessment.
  7. ISO, 2009, 31000 Risk management - Principles and guidelines.
  8. Kang, K., Cheol, H., Kang, S.G., 2015, "A Numerical Study on the $CO_2$ Leakage Through the Fault During Offshore Carbon Sequestration", J. Korean Soc. Mar. Environ. Energy, Vol. 18, No. 2, 94-101. https://doi.org/10.7846/JKOSMEE.2015.18.2.94
  9. Kim, S.H. and Han, S.K., 2009, "Technology Trends of HSE Engineering in Shipbuilding and Offshore Industry", Bull. Soc. Nav. Archit. Korea, Vol. 46, No. 3, 30-36.
  10. MOF, 2015, Development of Technology for $CO_2$ Offshore Geological Storage.
  11. Noh et al., 2012, "Analysis of Modality and Procedures for CCS as CDM Project and Its Countmeasures", J. Korean Soc. Mar. Environ. Energy, Vol. 15, No. 3, 263-272. https://doi.org/10.7846/JKOSMEE.2012.15.3.263
  12. Petroleum Safety Authority Norway, 2016 (amended), Regulations relating to health, safety and the environment in the petroleum activities and at certain onshore facilities.
  13. Salter, N., 2005, Implementation of the Hazards and Effects management Process (HEMP) at Shell Chemical Facilities.
  14. ScottishPower CCS Consortium, 2011, UK Carbon Capture and Storage Demonstration Competition.
  15. UK H.S.E., 2016a, ALARP "at a glance", http://www.hse.gov.uk/risk/theory/alarpglance.htm (accessed 2016.11.01.).
  16. UK H.S.E., 2016b, Principles and guidelines to assist HSE in its judgements that duty-holders have reduced risk as low as reasonably practicable, http://www.hse.gov.uk/risk/theory/alarp1.htm (accessed 2016.11.01.).
  17. UK H.S.E., 2016c, Regulating CCS, http://www.hse.gov.uk/carboncapture/regulating-ccs.htm (accessed 2016.11.01.).