DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Emergy Evaluation of Typhoon Maemi in Busan

태풍 매미가 부산시에 미치는 영향에 대한 에머지 평가

  • Park, KyungMin (Department of Ecological Engineering, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Kim, Dong-Myung (Department of Ecological Engineering, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Lee, Suk Mo (Department of Ecological Engineering, Pukyong National University)
  • Received : 2016.10.24
  • Accepted : 2017.02.17
  • Published : 2017.02.25

Abstract

Damage of both life and property has been increased by natural disaster under the influence of climate change, thus many natural disaster vulnerability researches have been carried out to make adaptation policy and impact assessment of climate change recently. Their method for assessing vulnerability usually have used proxy variables for making vulnerability indices. However, because their results were too qualitative and relative it tends to be hard to make absolute comparison and establish standard of prevention or adaptation ability. Accordingly, this study aimed at quantifying natural disaster vulnerability using emergy through recognizing disaster as the relations between order and disorder by system approach. As a result, ordering energy (4.66E+22 sej/yr) and ordered structure (1.98E+22 sej) of Busan in 2003 and disordering energy (7.80E+18 sej), disordered parts (4.55E+20 sej) and rebuilding energy (3.87E+20 sej) by typhoon Maemi were analysed. And then, this was compared with Hurricane Andrew in Dade County. Through this comparison, if the prevention ability of Busan increases, disordered parts can be reduced against the more powerful disordering energy. Also, prevention for additional damages by disaster is needed to practical rebuilding action. In conclusion, it was able to figure out the impact of disaster quantitatively by natural systems and urban systems showing as common measure. Based on this study and further research to make effective prevention for how much prevention ability should be increased will contribute to producing the scientific data for disaster management policy in future.

기후변화의 영향으로 자연재해에 의한 인명 및 재산의 피해가 증가함에 따라 자연재해 취약성에 관한 연구들이 근래에 폭넓게 수행되고 있으며, 기후변화의 영향평가와 적응 방재대책 마련이 활발히 진행되고 있다. 종래의 재해영향을 평가한 연구에서는 대리변수를 이용하여 취약성 평가를 수행하였으나, 이는 정성적이고 상대적인 결과를 도출하여 절대적인 비교나 방재 또는 적응능력의 기준을 제시하기 어려운 경향이 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 시스템 생태학적 접근법으로 재해를 Order와 Disorder의 관계로 인식하고 에머지평가법을 이용하여 정량적인 평가를 하고자 하였다. 먼저, 2003년 부산시를 대상으로 유입 에너지와 내부 자산을 파악하였고, 태풍 매미로 인해 발생 된 태풍 에너지, 태풍 영향 그리고 복구 에너지를 분석하였다. 그 결과, 유입 에너지는 4.66E+22 sej/yr, 내부 자산은 1.98E+22 sej, 태풍 에너지는 7.80E+18 sej, 태풍 영향은 4.55E+20 sej, 복구 에너지는 3.87E+20 sej로 나타났다. 이를 통해 재해 에너지에 대한 재해 영향을 허리케인 앤드류와 비교 고찰해봤을 때, 부산시의 방재능력을 증가시킬 경우, 매미보다 큰 태풍의 에너지에 대한 영향 정도를 줄일 수 있음을 알 수 있었고 피해에 대한 실질적인 복구를 통하여 추가피해에 대한 예방이 필요함을 알 수 있었다. 따라서 본 연구는 재해에 대한 영향을 동일한 척도로 나타내어 자연환경과 인간의 경제 시스템별로 정량적이게 파악할 수 있었으며 이러한 정량적인 취약성 평가가 이루어지고 추후 태풍 크기에 따라 방재능력을 어느 정도까지 증가시키는 것이 효율적인 방재인지에 대한 추가적인 연구를 통해 도시의 방재정책마련에 기여할 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Adger, W.N., 2006, "Vulnerability", Global Environmental Change, Vol. 16, 268-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006
  2. Brown, M.T., Campbell, D.E., DeVilbiss, C., Ulgiati, S., 2016, "The geobiosphere emergy baseline; A synthesis", Ecol. Modell., Vol. 339, No. 10, 92-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.03.018
  3. Brown M.T. and McClanahan, T.R., 1992, "Emergy Analysis Perspectives of Thailand and Mekong River Dam Proposals", Center for Wetlands and Water Resources, University of Florida, Phelps Lab, Museum Road, Gainseville, FL, 27.
  4. Brown M.T., McClanahan, T.R., 1996, "EMergy analysis perspectives of Thailand and Mekong River dam proposals", Ecol. Modell., Vol. 91, 105-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3800(95)00183-2
  5. Brown, M.T. and Ulgiati, S., 2011, "Understanding the global economic crisis: a biophysical perspective", Ecol. Modell., Vol. 223, 4-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.05.019
  6. Brown, M.T. and Woithe, R.D., 1995, Hurricane Andrew: Emergy Analysis of Dade County, the Hurricane Impact Area and Evaluation of Damages and Costs, Center for Environmental Policy, Department of Environmental Engineering Science, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 4(1-16).
  7. Brown, M.T., Woithe, R.D., Odum, H.T., Montague, C.L. and Odum, E.C., 1993, Emergy analysis perspectives of the Exxon Valdex oil spill in Prince Williams Sound, Alaska, Center for Wetlands and Water Resources, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 122.
  8. Busan Meotropolitan City, 2003, 42th Busan Statistical Yearbook.
  9. Chang L. and Huang S., 2011, Emergy Indices for Assessing Vulnerability, Emergy Synthesis 6: Theory and Applications of the Emergy Methodology, Center for Environmental Policy, Department of Environmental Engineering Science, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 531-538.
  10. Chang L. and Huang S., 2015, "Assessing urban flooding vulnerability with an emergy approach", Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 143, 11-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.06.004
  11. Fussel, H., 2007, "Vulnerability: A generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research", Global Environmental Change, Vol. 17, 155-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.05.002
  12. Huang, S.L., and Kao, W.Y. 2002. Emergy evaluation of damages and costs of Xang-Sane typhoon in Hsih-Chih. Journal of City and Planning, Vol. 29, No. 1, 89-113.
  13. Im, J.H., 2011, "An Ecological Economic Evaluation on the Carbon Reduction Plan of Urban by the Energy Modeling", Ph. D. dissertation, Department of Environmental Engineering, Graduate School, Pukyong National University, 123.
  14. IPCC, 2007, Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, M.L. Parry, O.F. Canziani, J.P. Palutikof, P.J. van der Linden and C.E. Hanson, Eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 976.
  15. IPCC, 2014: Summary for policy makers. In: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Field, C.B., V.R. Barros, D.J. Dokken, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P.R. Mastrandrea, and L.L. White (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1-32.
  16. Kang, D., 2013, "Emergy-based value of the contributions of the Yongsan River estuary ecosystem to the Korean economy", The Sea, Vol. 18, No. 1, 13-20. https://doi.org/10.7850/jkso.2013.18.1.13
  17. Kang, T., 2014, A Study on the Framework of Coastal Vulnerability Assessment, Department of Civil Engineering, Ph. D. dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, Pukyong National University, 1-47.
  18. Kim, C., Nam, K. and Lee, J., 2015, "Quantification of Climate Change Vulnerability Index for Extreme Weather -Focused on Typhoon case-", J. Environ. Impact Assess. Vol. 24, No. 2, 190-203. https://doi.org/10.14249/eia.2015.24.2.190
  19. Kim, Y., 2003, "Path and Surface Wind Speed of Typhoon Maemi", Journal of the Wind Engineering Institute of Korea, Vol. 7, No. 2, 132-137.
  20. KMA(Korea Meteorological Administration), 2003, Annual Climatological Report, Seoul, Korea, 94.
  21. Lee, S. and Chang, E.M., 2009, "Application of GIS to Typhoon Risk Assessment", The Jornal of GIS Association of Korea, Vol. 17, No. 2, 243-249.
  22. Lee, S.M., Son, J. and Kang, D., 2000, "Evaluation of Korea's Sustainable Development by the Systems Ecology (I) -EMERGY Analysis of Korea's Natural Environment and Economic Activity-, J. of the Korean Environmental Sciences Society, Vol. 9, No. 6, 449-454.
  23. Ministry of Public Safety and Security, 2003, Korea Disaster Yearbook, 173-176.
  24. Oh, S., Kang, Y. and Lee, H., 2014, "A Study on Evaluation of Coastal Cities' Vulnerability by Climate Change in Korea", Journal of the Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea, Vol. 16, No. 4, 87-97. https://doi.org/10.14577/kirua.2014.16.1.87
  25. Odum, H.T., 1996, Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Environmental Decision Making, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1-317.
  26. Odum, H.T. 2000, Handbook of Emergy Evaluation, Folio#2 Emergy of Global Processes, Center for Environmental Policy, University of Florida.
  27. Odum, H.T. Brown, M.T. and S.B. Willams, 2000, Handbook of Emergy Evaluation, Folio#1 Introduction and Global Budget, Center for Environmental Policy, University of Florida.
  28. Odum, H.T. and Odum, E. C., 1976, Energy Basis for Man and Nature, 3-32.
  29. Park, S., Lee, W., Kwon, T., Lee, B., Son, Y. and Cho, Y., 2011, "Vulnerability Assessment for Ocean to Climate Change Using Spatial Information Based on GIS", Journal of Korea spatial information society, Vol. 19, No, 3, 1-9.
  30. Sanddra, R.B., 2014, Design and use of composite indices in assessments of climate change vulnerability and resilience, United States Agency for International Development, 4-5.Statistics of Gorundwater, accessed June 1 2016 at National Groundwater Information Center, http://www.gims.go.kr.
  31. Ministry of Environment, Statistics of land cover status by regional area, 2000-2004, accessed July 21 at https://egis.me.go.kr/bd/ listMetaDatasrch.do.
  32. Korea Forest Service, Statistics of Landslide, 2003, accessed October 10 2016 at http://www.forest.go.kr.
  33. Ministry of Environment, Statistics of Watersupply, 2004, accessed August 7 at http://library.me.go.kr.
  34. Yoo, G. and Kim, I., 2008, Development and application of a climate change vulnerability index, Korea Environment Institute, 41-43.