DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Association between Psychosocial Work Environment and Depressive Symptoms among Korean Teachers

한국 교사의 심리·사회적 근로환경과 우울 위험의 관련성

  • Choi, Eunsuk (College of Nursing.Research Institute of Nursing Science, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kwon, Minjung (College of Nursing, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Hae-Joon (National Health Insurance Corporation) ;
  • Cho, Gyo-Young (Department of Statistics, Kyungpook National University)
  • 최은숙 (경북대학교 간호대학.간호과학연구소) ;
  • 권민정 (경북대학교 간호대학) ;
  • 이해준 (국민건강보험공단) ;
  • 조교영 (경북대학교 통계학과)
  • Received : 2017.08.01
  • Accepted : 2017.11.19
  • Published : 2017.12.31

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to identify the association between psychosocial work environment and depressive symptoms among Korean teachers. Methods: Data on 235 elementary school teachers and 341 middle and high school teachers was obtained from the 2014 Korean Working Condition Survey. The effect of psychosocial work environment on depressive symptoms was determined by multiple logistic regression analyses. Results: The prevalence of depressive symptoms was 18 % in elementary school teachers and 24 % in middle and high school teachers. When adjusted for demographics and other socio-psychological and environmental factors, 'social community at work' served as a protection factor for Korean teachers' depressive symptoms. In addition, 'cognitive demands' in elementary school teachers and 'social support from supervisors' in middle and high school teachers were found to be predictors of depressive symptoms. Conclusion: Interventions to increase 'social community at work' and 'social support from supervisors', and to decrease 'cognitive demands' may be helpful for Korean teachers at risk of depression.

Keywords

References

  1. Statistics Korea. The sixth korea national health and nutrition examination survey (KNHANES VI-3) [Internet]. Cheongju: Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2015 [cited 2017 June 8]. Available from: http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=117&tblId=DT_11702_N062&conn_path=I2
  2. Henderson M, Glozier N, Elliott KH. Long term sickness absence: Is caused by common conditions and needs managing. British Medical Journal. 2005;330(7495):802-803. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.330.7495.802
  3. Karpansalo M, Kauhanen J, Lakka TA, Manninen P, Kaplan GA, Salonen JT. Depression and early retirement: Prospective population based study in middle aged men. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2005;59(1):70-74. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2003.010702
  4. Choi ES, Ju YS, Yim J, Cho SJ, Jeon KS, Ha YM, et al. Time series analysis for the 1st to 4th Korean working conditions survey. Research Report. Ulsan: Occupational Safety & Health Research Institute; 2015 October. Report No.: 2015-1058.
  5. OECD. TALIS 2013 results: An international perspective on teaching and learning [Internet]. Paris: OECD Publishing. 2014 [cited 2017 November 3]. Avaliable from: http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/education/talis-2013-results_9789264196261-en#page4
  6. Fullan M. The new meaning of educational change. New York, NY: Teachers College; 2001. 297 p.
  7. Jepson E, Forrest S. Individual contributory factors in teacher stress: The role of achievement striving and occupational commitment. British Journal of Educational. Psychology. 2006;76(1):183-197. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X37299
  8. Bauer J, Stamm A, Virnich K, Wissing K, Müller U, Wirsching M, et al. Correlation between burnout syndrome and psychological and psychosomatic symptoms among teachers. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 2006;79(3):199-204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-005-0050-y
  9. De Heus P, Diekstra RF. Do teachers burn out more easily? A comparison of teachers with other social professions on work stress and burnout symptoms. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1999. 270 p.
  10. Stansfeld SA, Fuhrer R, Shipley MJ, Marmot MG. Work characteristics predict psychiatric disorder: Prospective results from the Whitehall II study. Occupational & Environmental Medicine. 1999;56(5):302-307. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.56.5.302
  11. Paterniti S, Niedhammer I, Lang T, Consoli SM. Psychosocial factors at work, personality traits and depressive symptoms: Longitudinal results from the GAZEL Study. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 2002;181(2):111-117. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.181.2.111
  12. Cox T. Stress research & stress management: Translating research into practice. Sudbury: HSE Books; 1993. 120 p.
  13. Schutte S, Chastang JF, Malard L, Parent-Thirion A, Vermeylen G, Niedhammer I. Psychosocial working conditions and psychological well-being among employees in 34 European countries. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 2014;87(8):897-907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-014-0930-0
  14. Choi ES, Jeon GS. The Impacts of psychosocial work conditions on self-rated health among Korean workers. Korean Journal of Occupational Health Nursing. 2016;25(4):300-310. https://doi.org/10.5807/kjohn.2016.25.4.300
  15. Choi ES, Jeon GS. The Impacts of psychosocial work environments on depressive symptoms among Korean registered nurses. Korean Journal of Occupational Health Nursing. 2017;26(1):30-39. https://doi.org/10.5807/kjohn.2017.26.1.30
  16. Eurofound. Fifth European working condition survey. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2012. 160 p.
  17. Krieger T, Zimmermann J, Huffziger S, Ubl B, Diener C, Kuehner C, et al. Measuring depression with a well-being index: further evidence for the validity of the WHO Well-Being Index (WHO-5) as a measure of the severity of depression. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2014;156:240-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2013.12.015
  18. Kim HR, Lee SY, Lee YR, Kim HH, Lee WY. Teacher's job stress and health survey. Research Report. Seoul: Korean Teachers Educational Worker's Union; 2016 December.
  19. Borrelli I, Benevene P, Fiorilli C, D'Amelio F, Pozzi G. Working conditions and mental health in teachers: A preliminary study. Occupational Medicine. 2014;64(7):530-532. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqu108
  20. Nakada A, Iwasaki S, Kanchika M, Nakao T, Deguchi Y, Konishi A, et al. Relationship between depressive symptoms and perceived individual level occupational stress among japanese schoolteachers. Industrial Health. 2016;54(5):396-402. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2015-0195
  21. Zhang Q, Zhu W. Exploring emotion in teaching: Emotional labor, burnout, and satisfaction in Chinese higher education. Communication Education. 2008;2009;57(1):105-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520701586310
  22. Aftab M, Khatoon T. Demographic differences and occupational stress of secondary school teachers. European Scientific Journal. March Edition. 2012;8(5):159-175.
  23. June KJ, Choi ES. Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the copenhagen psyco-social questionnaire scale. Korean Journal of Occupational Health Nursing. 2013;22(1):1-12. https://doi.org/10.5807/kjohn.2013.22.1.1
  24. June KJ, Choi ES, Park M-J. Effect of psychosocial work environment and self-efficacy on mental health of office workers. Korean Journal of Occupational Health Nursing. 2013;22(3):228-239. https://doi.org/10.5807/kjohn.2013.22.3.228
  25. Cicognani E, Pietrantoni L, Palestini L, Prati G. Emergency workers' quality of life: The protective role of sense of community, efficacy beliefs and coping strategies. Social Indicators Research. 2009;94(3):449-463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9441-x
  26. Ahghar G. The role of school organizational climate in occupational stress among secondary school teachers in Tehran. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health. 2008;21(4):319-329. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10001-008-0018-8
  27. Skaalvik EM, Skaalvik S. Teacher job satisfaction and motivation to leave the teaching profession: Relations with school context, feeling of belonging, and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2011;27(6):1029-1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.04.001
  28. Van Dick R, Wagner U. Stress and strain in teaching: A structural equation approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 2001;71(2):243-259. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709901158505
  29. Rugulies R, Aust B, Pejtersen JH. Do psychosocial work environment factors measured with scales from the copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire predict register-based sickness absence of 3 weeks or more in Denmark? Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. 2010;38(3):42-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494809346873
  30. Chung MK, Joo YH, Chung BU. A study of policy strategies and directions for reducing the burden of teachers in administrative affairs. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education. 2013;30(3):377-404. https://doi.org/10.24211/tjkte.2013.30.3.377

Cited by

  1. Relationship between simultaneous exposure to ergonomic risk factors and work-related lower back pain: a cross-sectional study based on the fourth Korean working conditions survey vol.30, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40557-018-0269-1
  2. 근로환경조사 자료의 활용에 관한 고찰 vol.29, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.15269/jksoeh.2019.29.4.431
  3. The Effects of Work Characteristics Related to Work-Life Imbalance on Presenteeism among Female Workers in the Health and Social Work Sectors: Mediation Analysis of Psychological and Physical Health P vol.18, pp.12, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126218