DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

International Comparisons of Management Systems for Medical Waste and Suggestions for Future Direction of Medical Waste Management System in Korea

세계 각국의 의료폐기물 관리 제도 비교: 한국 의료폐기물 관리체계에 대한 시사점

  • Oh, Se-Eun (Cancer Early Detection Branch, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Ji, Kyung-hee (Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Yongin University) ;
  • Park, Seokhwan (Department of Environmental Engineering, Seowon University) ;
  • Kim, Pangyi (Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Yongin University) ;
  • Lee, Kyoung-Mu (Department of Environmental Health, Korea National Open University)
  • 오세은 (국립암센터 암검진사업과) ;
  • 지경희 (용인대학교 산업환경보건학과) ;
  • 박석환 (서원대학교 환경공학과) ;
  • 김판기 (용인대학교 산업환경보건학과) ;
  • 이경무 (한국방송통신대학교 환경보건학과)
  • Received : 2017.12.15
  • Accepted : 2017.12.20
  • Published : 2017.12.30

Abstract

Objectives: Because the amount of medical waste (i.e., health-care waste) generated in Korea is rapidly increasing and social concern against its safety is widespread, a number of issues related with medical wastes are being discussed. The purpose of this study is to compare diverse medical waste management systems worldwide and propose future directions of a medical waste management system in Korea. Methods: Literature review was conducted mainly on the WHO, and developed countries such as the European Union (Germany, Belgium and UK), Japan and the United States. For these countries, the data with respect to their systems for medical waste management ranging from the definition of medical waste to the whole processes of collection, transportation and disposal were summarized and compared. Results: The terminology and classification of medical wastes were not consistent for WHO recommendation, EU, Japan, US and Korea. Comparison of the collection, storage, transportation and disposal of medical waste showed that Korea had rather stronger regulations for medical waste management compared to developed countries including Belgium (Flanders region), Germany, Japan and the US. Considering that developed countries adopt rather flexible disposal system especially for general medical wastes which pose lower possibility of infection, Korean government could consider diversifying disposal methods other than incineration. It may also be very important to try to reduce the amount of medical wastes and enough capacity for off-site incineration are secured. Conclusion: Our study of international comparisons suggests that it is necessary to continue to identify advantages and disadvantages of the current medical waste management systems and establish more effective one in Korea.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Health & Welfare, Korea. Medical Act: Article 17. 1981.
  2. Ministry of Environment, Korea. Wastes Control Act: Article 3. 1999.
  3. Ministry of Environment, Korea. Waste Management Act: Article 2 and 5. 1999.
  4. World Health Organization. Safe management of wastes from health-care activities. 2nd edition. 2014.
  5. World Health Organization. Health-care waste. Available: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs253/en/ [accessed 22 December 2017]
  6. Oh SE, Lee J, Ahn H, Kim KY, Park S, Ha K, et al. A Study on the spatial distribution of medical waste generation and treatment in Korea. Journal of Environmental Health Sciences. 2015;41(6):449-457.
  7. Ministry of Environment, Korea. Guide to medical waste management system. 2008.
  8. Korea Legislation Research Institute. Classification of waste in major foreign countries. 2012. p.86-91.
  9. European Union. Waste Framework Directive 2008/98/EC. Available: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32008L0098 [accessed 22 December 2017]
  10. European Union. ADR: European agreement concerning the international carriage of dangerous goods by road. 2015.
  11. United Kingdom. Environmental protection, england and wales: The Controlled waste(england and wales) regulations 2012. Available: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2012/811/contents/made [accessed 22 December 2017]
  12. European Union. Waste Framework Directive 67/548/EEC.
  13. US Environmental Protection Agency. Medical waste. Available: http://www.epa.gov/osw/nonhaz/industrial/medical/ [accessed 22 December 2017]
  14. US Environmental Protection Agency. Model guidelines for state medical waste management. Available: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-02/documents/model_guidelines_for_state_medical_waste_management.pdf [accessed 22 December 2017]
  15. EPA Guidelines. Medical waste - storage, transport, and disposal. 2003.
  16. Healthcare Environmental Resource Center. Types of regulated medical waste (RMW). Avaliable: http://www.hercenter.org/rmw/rmwtypes.cfm [accessed 22 December 2017]
  17. Ministry of the Environment, Japan. Waste management and public cleansing law. https://www.env.go.jp/en/recycle/basel_conv/files/Waste_Management_and_Public_Cleansing.pdf [accessed 22 December 2017]
  18. Ministry of Health, Japan. Infective waste disposal manual based on waste disposal method. 2012.
  19. Hanashi Y. Investigation into the proper disposal of home medical waste. JMAJ 2011;54(5): 271-276.
  20. Ministry of Environment. A Study on the improvement of medical waste management system. 2013.12. p.21-29.
  21. Ministry of Environment, Korea. A Study on the improvement of the infectious waste management system. 1999.
  22. Korea Environment Corporation. Status of designated waste generation and treatment. 2015.
  23. Ahn SH, Ahn SY. The study of area-division strategy for medical waste disposal. Journal of Digital Convergence. 2014;12(9):255-263. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2014.12.9.255
  24. Ministry of Environment, Korea. A Study on the standard of the material of both sealed cover and collecting carriage of waste. 2012.
  25. Ministry of Environment, Korea. A study on risk assessment of transportation of medical waste and evaluation of adopting diverse disposal methods for medical waste. 2015. p.224.
  26. Oh SE, Park S, Ahn H, Ji K, Kim P, Hong YS, et al. A Survey on the current state of medical waste treatment and the opinion of medical waste managers about on-site treatment of the general hospitals in Korea. Korean Public Health Research. 2016; 42(3):13-22.
  27. Inova fairfax hospital. Medical waste reduction and minimization. 2011.
  28. Yang IH, A study of university hospital employee's knowledge, attitude and practice of infectious medical wastes [dissertation]. [Kwangju]: Graduate School Chonnam National University. 2008.
  29. United Kingdom. Environment and sustainability. Health Technical Memorandum 07-01. 2013
  30. Environmental Protection, England and Wales. The Controlled Waste (England and Wales) Regulations 2012. Available: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2012/811/pdfs/uksi_20120811_en.pdf [accessed 22 December 2007]
  31. Ministry of Eduction. Article 6 of the School Health Act. 1988.
  32. Gleis M. Federal Environmental Agency, Berlin, Health waste management in Germany and the European Union 2015.