DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Driving Behavior Characteristics under Red Right Camera Enforcement at Signalized Intersections

신호교차로에서 무인교통단속 규제에 따른 주행 특성

  • Received : 2015.05.23
  • Accepted : 2016.10.04
  • Published : 2016.10.17

Abstract

PURPOSES : The objective of this study was to analyze variations in the vehicle driving behavior characteristics on signalized intersections according to the use of traffic enforcement camera (red light camera). METHODS : In order to analyze the driving behavior characteristics on signalized intersections when red light camera are installed, the target sites for investigation were selected depending on whether the red light camera is installed and accident rates increased after the installation. In particular, to analyze the characteristics of dilemma zones in signalized intersections, approach speed and deceleration speed of 3 type vehicles (passing vehicles during a yellow light, stopping at a yellow light, passing vehicles during a green light) were examined. Based on these data, the starting point, ending point, and distance of the dilemma zones were calculated. Also, the locations of increased traffic accidents and decreased accidents after the installation of the equipment were distinguished when analyzing the traffic accident characteristics. RESULTS : Analysis results revealed that there was a tendency for the dilemma zone distance to decrease after the installation of equipment(red light camera) in most sites. This tendency was found to be due to the decrease in the approaching speed of vehicles at intersections after the installation of equipment, resulting in the starting and ending points of dilemma zone to become closer to the stop line. Moreover, analysis showed that the number of traffic accidents decreased for most intersections after the installation of equipment and safety of the intersections increased somewhat. CONCLUSIONS : In general, installation of equipment(red light camera) caused the intersections approaching speed and dilemma zone distance to decrease. Decision-making is difficult for drivers in the dilemma zone, so the decrease in the dilemma zone distance implies an improvement in traffic safety. Furthermore, the number of accidents within intersections significantly decreased after the equipment was installed, leading to the conclusion that installation of the equipment affected the decrease in traffic accidents.

Keywords

References

  1. AASHTO, 1965. A Policy on Geometric Design of Rural Highways.
  2. FHWA, 1984. Engineering Factors Affecting Traffic Singal Yellow Time? Data Collection Manual.
  3. Gazis, D., Herman, R. and Maradudin, A., 1960. The Problem of the Amber Signal Light in Traffic Flow. Operations Research 8, No. 1.
  4. ITE, 2008. Traffic Signal Timing Manual.
  5. Kim M. S., 2006. A Study on the Characteristics of Traffic Accidents on Major Intersection before and after installing Red Light Camera, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Master's Thesis. (김명석, 2006. 무인다기능단속시스템 설치 전.후 교차로 교통 사고 발생특성에 관한 연구. 석사학위논문, 서울산업대학 교 산업대학원)
  6. Kim T. Y., Park B. H., 2009. Effects on the Accident Reduction of Red Light Camera Using Empirical Bayes Method, The Journal of The Korea Institute of Intelligent Transport Systems, Vol.8, No.6. (김태영, 박병호, 2009. 경험적 베이즈 방법을 이용한 무인신호 위반단속장비의 사고감소 효과. 한국ITS학회논문지, 제8 권 제6호)
  7. Korean National Police Agency, 2011. Traffic Sigmal installation, maintenance manual. (경찰청, 2011. 교통신호기 설치.관리 매뉴얼)
  8. Korean National Police Agency, 2014. Road Traffic Accidents in Korea 2013. (경찰청, 2014. 2013년 교통사고통계)
  9. Lee S. H., Lee Y. D., Do M. S., 2012. Safety Impacts of Red Light Enforcement on Signalized Intersections, Journal of Korean Society of Transportation, Vol.30, No.6. (이상혁, 이용두, 도명식, 2012. 교차로 신호위반 단속카메라 설치가 차량사고에 미치는 영향. 대한교통학회지, 제30권 제6호)
  10. Liu, C., Herman, R. and Gazis, D., 1996. A Review of the Yellow Interval Dilemma. TR-part A, Vol.30 Issue 5.
  11. Martin, P. T., Kalyani, V. C., 2003. Evaluation of Advance Warning Signals on High Speed Signalized Intersections. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Utah Traffic Lab.
  12. Parsonson, P. S. 1974., Small area detection at intersection approaches. ITE Technical Committee Report No 18.
  13. Retting, R. A. et al., 2002. Reductions in Injury Crashes Associated With Red Light Camera Enforcement in Oxnard, California. American Journal of Public Health, 92(11).
  14. Retting, R. A. et al., 2003. Effects of Red Light Cameras on Violations and Crashes : A Review of the International Literature. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol.4, Issue 1.
  15. Road traffic authority, 2004. Analysis of accident type at intersection installed red light camera. (도로교통공단, 2004. 신호위반 단속시스템 운영에 따른 교차 로 교통사고 유형분석 연구)
  16. Ryu C. N. et al., 2008. Analysis of Dilemma Zone Safety Considering Signal Location, Journal of Korean Society of Transportation, Vol.26, No.1. (류창남 외, 2008. 신호기 위치에 따른 딜레마존 안전율 분석. 대한교통학회지, 제26권 제1호)
  17. Schneider, H., 2010. Effectiveness of Red-Light Cameras for Reduction the Number of Crashes at Intersections in the City of Lafayette. Louisiana Department of Transportation.
  18. Sheffi, Y., Mahmassani, H., 1981. A Model of Driver Behavior at High Speed Signalize Intersections. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  19. Shin, K. and Washington, S., 2007. The Impact of Red Light Cameras on Safety in Arizona. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 39(6).
  20. Synectics Transportation Consultants INC., 2003. Evaluation of The Red Light Camera Enforcement Pilot Project. Ontario Ministry of Transportation.
  21. Washington, S., 2005. The Impact of Red Light Cameras on Safety in Arizona. Arizona Department of Transportation.
  22. Williams, W. L., 1977. Driver Behavior during Yellow interval. Transportation Research Record 644.
  23. Zegeer, C. V. and Deen, R. C., 1977. Identification of Hazardous Location on City Streets. Traffic Quarterly.