DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Beginning Elementary School Teachers' Difficulties to Suffer in the Science Classes from the Perspective of Content Knowledge and Teaching Method

과학 내용지식과 교수방법 측면에서 초등학교 초임교사가 과학수업에서 겪는 어려움

  • Received : 2016.06.09
  • Accepted : 2016.07.27
  • Published : 2016.08.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the difficulties of science classes experienced by newly appointed elementary school teachers in terms of science content knowledge and teaching method, and to suggest some implications for their effective adaptation. We recorded science lessons conducted by 3 beginning elementary school teachers with less than 5 years experience and also analyzed their classes and interview materials. The results were as follows. First, difficulties that they experienced in science content knowledge was the possession of scientific errors or misconceptions, the lack of awareness and confidence in scientific concepts and principles, and the possession of negative concept about learning materials. Second, difficulties that they experienced in teaching method was the absence of reorganization of the textbook contents, using closed questions, one-sided instructions and explanations by teacher, the application of incomplete analogy, and the lack of understanding about experiment activities. The implication from this study is that beginning teachers need to be provided with curriculum oriented in experiment at teachers college and to participate in various types of educational opportunities.

이 연구에서는 교육 경력 5년 이내의 초임교사들이 초등학교 과학수업에서 겪는 어려움을 과학내용지식과 과학교수방법 측면에서 조사하여 이들의 초기 적응과 전문성 제고를 위한 시사점을 얻고자 하였다. 연구 대상은 교직 경력 1-3년의 경기도 지역 초등학교 교사 3명이며, 이들의 실제 수업과 수업 자료, 그리고 인터뷰 결과를 바탕으로 이들이 겪는 어려움을 분석하였다. 연구 결과, 첫째, 과학내용지식 측면에서 초임교사들이 겪는 어려움으로는 과학적 오류나 오개념 파지, 과학적 지식에 대한 확신과 자신감 결여, 그리고 학습 대상에 대한 부정적 개념 소유 등이 관찰되었다. 둘째, 과학교수방법 측면에서는 교과내용 재구성의 어려움, 폐쇄적 발문 구사, 교사에 의한 일방적인 인도와 설명, 불완전한 비유의 사용, 그리고 실험에 대한 이해와 지도방법 부족 등과 같은 어려움을 겪고 있었다. 이러한 결과를 바탕으로 초임교사들의 과학수업지도의 현장성과 전문성을 향상시키기 위해서는 교대 교육과정에서 실험 비중이 높은 교육과정을 제공하고 콘텐츠 중심의 다양한 교육연수 기회를 부여하는 것이 요구된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Appleton, K., & Kint, I. (1999). How do beginning elementary teachers cope with science: Development of pedagogical content knowledge in science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston, MA.
  2. Bybee, R. W. (1993). Reforming science education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  3. Cho, H., & Ko, Y. (2008). Re-conceptualization of secondary science teacher's pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) and its application. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 28(6), 618-632.
  4. Cho, Y., & Woo, J. (1998). An analysis of teacher's questioning behavior in elementary science classrooms -Focusing on children’s thinking abilities. Journal of Educational Studies, 27, 51-69.
  5. Choi, C., Cho, M., & Yeo, S. (2012). Analysis on teachers’ perception of questioning and teaching practices in elementary science class. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 31(1), 57-70. https://doi.org/10.15267/KESES.2012.31.1.057
  6. Choi, K., Park, J., Choi, B., Nam, J., Choi, G., & Lee, K. (2004). Analysis of verbal interaction between teachers and students in middle school science classroom. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 24(6), 1039-1048.
  7. Choi, S., Lee E., & Kang, H. (2006). The effects of the visual-analogical learning on student creativity and science achievement in elementary school science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 26(2), 167-176.
  8. Choo, K. (2014). Narrative inquiry on curriculum reconstruction of new elementary school teachers. Journal of Curriculum Integration, 8(2), 70-97.
  9. Choo, K., & Sin, J. (2015). A study on elementary school teachers’ perception of curriculum integration and types of restructuring. Teacher Education Research, 54(1), 120-137. https://doi.org/10.15812/ter.54.1.201503.120
  10. Czerniak, C., & Shriver, M. (1994). An examination of preservice science teachers’ beliefs and behaviors as related to self-efficacy. Journal of Science Teacher Educations, 5(3), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02614577
  11. Fosnot, C. T. (1988). Enquiring teachers, enquiring learners: A constructivist approach for teaching. New York, NY: University Teacher College.
  12. Han, J. Y. (2010). Co-teaching with in-service teacher: teacher education method for beginning science teacher. Teacher Education Research, 49(3), 241-255. https://doi.org/10.15812/ter.49.3.201012.241
  13. Huberman, M. (1989). The professional life cycle of teachers. Teachers College Record, 91(1), 31-57.
  14. Jenkins, E. (1998). The schooling of laboratory science. In J. Wellington (Ed.), Practical work in school science. London: Routledge.
  15. Jeon, H., Yu, M., Hong, H., & Park, E. (2009). Study on teaching anxiety and efforts for professional development of beginning secondary science teachers. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 29(1), 68-78.
  16. Kim, E. (1987). Cognitive psychology: Theory and application. Seoul, Korea: Jeongmin-sa.
  17. Kim, J., Oh, W., & Park, S. (1999). Grade 7th pupils’ ideas about identification and control of variables in inquiry problems. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 19(4), 674-683.
  18. Kwak, Y. (2011). A study on actual conditions and ways to improve primary school science teaching. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 32(4), 422-434. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2011.32.4.422
  19. Kwak, Y., & Kim J. (2003). Qualitative research on common features of best practices in the secondary school science classroom. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 23(2), 144-154.
  20. Kwon, H., & Noh, T. (1999). A study on science teachers’ practices and perceptions of using analogies. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 19(4), 665-673.
  21. Lee, S., Jhun, Y., Hong, J., Shin, Y., Choi, J., & Lee, I. (2007). Difficulties experienced by elementary school teachers in science classes. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 26(1), 97-107.
  22. Lee, S., & Lim, C. (1997). Preservice elementary teachers’ understanding on the basic science concepts. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 16(2), 325-339.
  23. Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2004). Research of pedagogical content knowledge in science: Developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of research in science teaching, 41(4), 370-391. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20007
  24. Park, E., Lee, E, Lee H., Lim, S., & Cho, U. (1998). Study of the development of an induction program for the first-year teacher. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 15(1), 220-239.
  25. Park, J. (2011). A case study on elementary science classes from the viewpoint of good teaching -Focused on teaching case in the field of life. Biology Education, 39(2), 277-287. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2011.39.2.277
  26. Park, J., & Noh, S. (2011). Application of instruction consulting to improve the elementary preservice teachers’ professionalism for inquiry-based classes. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 30(2), 152-161. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2011.30.2.152
  27. Park, M., Ahn, H., & Nam, M. (2005). The difficulties experienced by the novice elementary school teachers in the mathematics classes. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 8(2), 291-314.
  28. Park, S., & Oliver, J. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualization of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6
  29. Mewborn, D. S. (1999). Reflective thinking among pre-service elementary mathematics teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(3), 316-341. https://doi.org/10.2307/749838
  30. Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology [MEST]. (2009). School science curriculum. Notification No. 2009-41. Seoul, Korea: Author.
  31. Nam, Y., & Kim, H. (2012). An analysis of newly-appointed elementary teacher’s anxiety state in science class. Journal of Research in Elementary Curriculum Instruction, 15, 1-17.
  32. Noh, T., Kim, Y., Yang, C., & Kang, H. (2011). A case study on beginning teachers' teaching professionalism based on pedagogical content knowledge in science-gifted education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 31(8), 1214-1228. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2011.31.8.1214
  33. Shin, H., & Kim, H. (2010). Analysis of elementary teachers’ and students’ views about difficulties on open science inquiry activities. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 29(3), 262-276.
  34. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(4), 4-14.
  35. Stanbury, K., & Zimmerman, J. (2000). Lifelines to the classroom: Designing support for beginning teachers. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Improving Science Teacher.
  36. Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York, NY: The Free Press.
  37. Van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & De Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673-695. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199808)35:6<673::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-J
  38. Willen, W. W. (1991). Questioning skill for teacher. Washington, D.C.: National Education Association.
  39. Yoon, H. (2004). Pre-service elementary teachers difficulties in science lessons. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 23(1), 74-84.
  40. Yu, E., Ko, Y., Lee, S., & Kim, C. (2006). Analysis of classroom discourse and narrative characteristics in science teaching. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 23(2), 101-127.

Cited by

  1. 탐구형 초등과학수업 '호흡' 차시에서 교사의 경력에 따른 교수행동 및 시각적 주의 분석 vol.37, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2018.37.2.206
  2. PCK에 근거한 초등교사 임용후보자 선정경쟁시험의 과학과 문항 분석 vol.39, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2019.39.5.585
  3. Elementary science teacher education in Korea: past, present, and future vol.5, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0041-z
  4. 불간섭주의와 교사협력 - 과학수업을 위한 두 초등교사의 교사협력 사례 연구 - vol.39, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2020.39.1.100