대한지리학회지 (Journal of the Korean Geographical Society)

대한지리학회 (The Korean Geographical Society)
권호 표지

모바일 테크놀로지 활용 탐구기반 야외조사활동의 설계와 적용: 경주 양동마을을 사례로

The Design and Application of an Inquiry-based Fieldwork Program using Wireless Mobile Devices to Investigate the Impacts of Tourism on Yangdong Village

  • 이종원 (이화여자대학교 사회과교육과) ;
  • 오선민 (이화여자대학교 사회과교육과 대학원)
  • Lee, Jongwon (Department of Social Studies Education, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Oh, Sunmin (Department of Social Studies Education, Ewha Womans University)
  • 투고 : 2016.12.19
  • 발행 : 2016.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 경주 양동마을의 지속가능발전을 주제로 탐구기반 야외조사활동 프로그램을 개발하고 현장적용 연구를 통해 프로그램을 평가하는 것이다. 효과적인 탐구기반 야외조사활동의 설계를 위해서는 탐구질문, 조사대상 지역, 모바일 테크놀로지의 역할, 학습활동 및 산출물 설계, 교사의 역할에 대한 이해가 중요하다. 양동마을은 2010년 세계문화유산으로 지정된 이후 급격한 변화를 겪고 있으며, 학생들은 양동마을에서 가옥의 변화를 조사하고, 주민들을 인터뷰하고, 마을에서 변해야 하는 것과 변하지 말아야 하는 것을 조사한다. 학생들의 야외 데이터 수집을 지원하기 위해 모바일 테크놀로지(예, Collector for ArcGIS)가 활용되었다. 프로그램은 2016년 2월 고등학교 답사동아리 학생들(N=21)이 참여해 현장적용 연구가 진행되었다. 학생들의 사전-사후활동, 야외에서의 데이터 수집활동이 관찰되었으며, 학생들이 수집한 데이터와 제작한 산출물을 분석하였다. 프로그램 참여를 통해 학생들은 양동마을에 대한 지식과 가치가 높아졌을 뿐 아니라 과정에 대해서도 만족과 즐거움을 표시했다. 모바일 테크놀로지의 활용은 탐구기반 야외조사활동에서 학습활동의 실제성을 높여주고, 학생들 간 협력을 원활하게 하며, 공유가 가능한 디지털 형태의 산출물 생산을 지원한다.

This paper describes the development of an inquiry-based fieldwork program based on Yangdong village where students explore the ways that it can develop in a sustainable way. Important considerations in an inquiry-based fieldwork design include what the key inquiry questions should be, the geographical issues of fieldwork location, the potential roles of mobile technologies, design of learning activities and a final product, and the roles of a teacher. Student fieldwork activities, including mapping land-use changes at the building level, detecting what should be changed or remain the same, and conducting interview with residents to examine their perceptions of overall tourism impacts, are supported by mobile technologies (i.e., the Collector for ArcGIS and the Google Forms). Twenty one high school students participated in a field test of the program in February 2016, which allowed authors to evaluate the program. Students' pre-, in-, and post-fieldwork activities were observed and the data and final products which they gathered and producted were analyzed. The post-program survey indicated that the students deepened and expanded their understanding of Yangdong village and expressed their satisfaction with the program in general. Incorporating mobile technologies into inquiry-based geographical fieldwork can help students involved in collaborative problem solving and creative activities in real world settings and create a shareable multimodal product combining maps, photo, and text.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 강동진.김미연.박능재, 2011, "제도화에 따른 경주 양동 마을의 정주패턴 및 의식 변화," 국토계획, 46(5), 93-111.
  2. 강현미.박소현, 2011, "역사마을의 참여형 보존관리계획을 위한 제도적 접근방식에 관한 연구: 하회.양동마을 보존협의체 지원조례의 특성 분석을 중심으로," 대한건축학회지, 27(3), 241-252.
  3. 교육부, 2015, 2015 개정 사회과교육과정.
  4. 김미연, 2013, "세계문화유산 양동마을의 초가 복원정책에 관한 비판적 분석," 대한국토계획학회지, 48(6), 57-75.
  5. 방담이.박은미.윤회정.김지영.이윤하.박지은.송주연. 동효관.심병주.임희준.이현숙, 2013, "Big idea를 중심으로 한 통합형 과학 교육과정 틀 설계," 한국과학교육학회지, 33(5), 1041-1054. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.5.1041
  6. 배영민, 2008, "사회과 수업에서 테크놀로지의 통합: 이 론적 토대와 실제 사례," 사회과교육, 47(4), 59-94.
  7. 손명철, 2013, "학습자 주도적인 탐구형 세계지리 교과서 모형 탐색 - 영국의 고등학교 를 사례로," 한국지리환경교육학회지, 21(3), 117-128.
  8. 신재열, 2015, "지형 및 생태교육을 위한 현장학습활동 프로그램 개발: 낙동강 강정고령보 지역을 중심으로," 중등교육연구, 63(3), 391-415.
  9. 오정학, 2011, "경주 "양동마을"의 세계문화유산 등재가 지역주민의 삶의 질에 미치는 영향과 지속가능한 발전 방안 연구 - QOL/TQOL index를 이용하여," 농촌지도와 개발, 18(4), 793-824.
  10. 윤현호, 2014, "세계유산 등재 이후 관광으로 인한 양동마을 전통의 재구성," 관광연구, 29(2), 1-23.
  11. 이경한, 2015, "지리교육에서의 프로젝트 학습의 설계와 적용 - 마을 숲 미기후 조사를 중심으로," 한국지리환경교육학회지, 23(3), 55-70.
  12. 이주현.홍석인, 2012, "영구자석에 대한 Big Concept 기반 학습에서 아동들의 개념생태," 새물리, 62(6), 572-583. https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.62.572
  13. 이종원, 2011, "공간정보기술을 활용한 교수.학습모듈의 개발과 평가," 한국지리환경교육학회지, 19(3), 381-397.
  14. 이종원, 2016, "21세기 역량 개발을 위한 야외조사활동의 역할과 과제," 한국지리환경교육학회지, 24(1), 99-117.
  15. 이종원.오선민.김종미, 2015, "탐구기반 야외조사활동의 실천 전략," 한국지리환경교육학회 하계학술대회 발표요약집, 114-116.
  16. 이종원.함경림.김보경, 2007, "워크북 스타일 답사 자료집의 개발과 적용," 한국지리환경교육학회지, 15(4), 345-361.
  17. 조미헌.허희옥.강의성.류숙희.김용대.서정희, 2013, "형식 교육과 비형식 학습 경험을 통합한 스마트 프로젝트학습 활동 개발 및 적용," 한국정보교육학회 논문지, 17(3), 291-304.
  18. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R., 2002, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
  19. Braund, M. and Reiss, M., 2006, Towards a more authentic science curriculum: The contribution of outof-school learning, International Journal of Science Education, 28(2), 1373-1388. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500498419
  20. Chang, C-H., Chatterjea, K., Goh, D. H-L., Theng, Y. L., Lim, E-P., Sun, A., Razikin, K., Kim, T. N. Q., and Nguyen, Q. M., 2012, Lessons from learner experiences in a field-based inquiry in geography using mobile devices, International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 21(1), 41-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2012.639155
  21. Cochrane, T. and Bateman, R. 2010. Smartphones give you wings: Pedagogical affordances of mobile Web 2.0, Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 1-14.
  22. Dillenbourg, P. 1999. What do you mean by collaborative learning? in Dillenbourg, P. (ed.), Collaborativelearning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches, Elsevier, Oxford, 1-19.
  23. Doolittle, P. E. and Hicks, D., 2003, Constructivism as a theoretical foundation for the use of technology in social studies, Theory & Research in Social Education, 31(1), 72-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2003.10473216
  24. Duffy, T. M. and Cunningham, D. J., 1996, Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction, in Jonassen, D. H. (ed.), Educational Communications and Technology, Simon & Schuster Macmillan, New York, 170-199.
  25. Favier, T. and van der Schee, J., 2009, Learning geography by combining fieldwork with GIS, International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 18(4). 261-274. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382040903251091
  26. FitzGerald, E., 2012, Creating user-generated content for location-based learning: An authoring framework, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(3), 195-207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00481.x
  27. Fletcher, S., France, D., Moore, K., and Robinson, G., 2007, Practitioner perspectives on the use of technology in fieldwork teaching, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 31(2), 319-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260601063719
  28. France, D., Whalley, W. B., Mauchline, A., Powell, V., Welsh, K., Lerczak, A., Park, J., and Bednarz, R., 2015, Enhancing Fieldwork Learning Using Mobile Technologies, Springer, Cham.
  29. Fuller, I., Rawlinson, S., and Bevan, R., 2000, Evaluation of student learning experiences in physical geography fieldwork: Paddling or pedagogy?, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 24(2), 199-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/713677388
  30. Gold, J. R., Jenkins, A., Lee, R., Monk, J., Riley, J., Shepherd, I. D. H., and Unwin, D. J., 1991, Teaching geography in higher education, Blackwell, Oxford.
  31. Hedberg, J. G., 2014, Extending the pedagogy of mobility, Educational Media International, 51(3), 237-253. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2014.968447
  32. Johnson, K., 2003, Designing Language Teaching Tasks, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
  33. Jarvis, C. H., Dickie, J., and Brown, G., 2013, Going mobile: Perspectives on aligning learning and teaching in geography, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 37(1), 76-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2012.694069
  34. Jones, A. C., Scanlon, E., and Clough, G., 2013, Mobile learning: Two case studies of supporting inquiry learning in informal and semiformal settings, Computers & Education, 61(1), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.08.008
  35. Jong, M. S. and Tsai, C., 2016, Understanding the concerns of teachers about leveraging mobile technology to facilitate outdoor social inquiry learning: The EduVenture experience, Interactive Learning Environments, DOI:10.1080/10494820.2015.1113710.
  36. Kent, M., Gilbertson, D. D., and Hunt, C. O., 1997, Fieldwork in geography teaching: A critical review of the literature and approaches, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 21(3), 313-332. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098269708725439
  37. Kim, S., 2016, World heritage site designation impacts on a historic village: A case study on residents' perceptions of Hahoe village (Korea), Sustainability, 8(3), 258-273. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8030258
  38. Klopfer, E. and Squire, K., 2008, Environmental Detectives-the development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations, Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(2), 203-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9037-6
  39. Lambert, D. and Reiss, M., 2014, The place of fieldwork in geography and science qualifications, Institute of Education, University of London, London, Available at http://www.field-studies-council.org/media/1252064/lambert-reiss-2014-fieldwork-report.pdf.
  40. Lee, J. and Catling, S., 2016, What do geography textbook authors in England consider when they design content and select case studies? International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, DOI:10.1080/10382046.2016.1220125
  41. Levy, P., Aiyegbayo, O., and Little, S. 2009, Designing for inquiry-based learning with the learning activity management system, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(3), 238-252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00309.x
  42. McEwen, L., 1996, Fieldwork in the undergraduate geography programme: Challenges and changes, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 20(3), 379-384. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098269608709380
  43. Medizini, A., Meishar-Tal, H., and Sneh, Y., 2015, Use of mobile technologies as support tools for geography field trips, International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 24(1), 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2014.967514
  44. Norman, D. A. 1988. Case Study Research in Education, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
  45. Paas, F., 1992, Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitiveload approach, Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 429-434. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.429
  46. Price, S., Davies, P., Farr, W., Jewitt, C., Roussos, G., and Sin, G., 2014, Fostering geospatial thinking in science education through a customisable smartphone application, British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 160-170. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12000
  47. Riley, M., 2000, Into the key stage 3 history garden: Choosing and planting your enquiry questions, Teaching History, 99, 8-13.
  48. Roberts, M., 2013, Geography Through Enquiry: Approaches to Teaching and Learning in the Secondary School, The Geographical Association, Sheffield.
  49. Singapore Ministry of Education, 2014, 2014 Lower Secondary Geography Teaching Syllabuses, Singapore. http://www.moe.gov.sg/education/syllabuses/humanities/files/geography-lower-secondary-2014.pdf.
  50. Stokes, A., Magnier, K., and Weaver, R., 2011, What is the use of fieldwork? Conceptions of students and staff in geography and geology, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 35(1), 121-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2010.487203
  51. Sweller, J. and Cooper, G. A., 1985, The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra, Cognition and Instruction, 2(1), 59-80. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0201_3
  52. Tally, B., 2007, Digital technology and the end of social studies education, Theory & Research in Social Education, 35(2), 305-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2007.10473337
  53. Van Hook, S. J., Huziak-Clark, T. L., Hurnberger-Haag, J., and Ballone-Duran, L., 2009, Developing an understanding of inquiry by teachers and graduate student scientist through a collaborate professional development program, Electronic Journal of Science Education, 13(2), 30-61.
  54. Welsh, K. E., Mauchline, A. L., Park, J. R., Whalley, W. B., and France, D., 2013, Enhancing fieldwork learning with technology: Practitioner's perspectives, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 37(3), 399-415. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2013.792042
  55. World Heritage Convention, http://whc.unesco.org