Assessment of Underwater Penetration Performance for the Shape of the External Device of Shaped Charge

성형폭약 외부장치 형상에 따른 수중 관입성능 평가

  • Received : 2016.11.29
  • Accepted : 2016.12.16
  • Published : 2016.12.30

Abstract

For underwater steel structure, cut that underwater shaped charge device that combines a spring hose, which is an external device of pressure resistance and flexibility with flexible shaped charge, was invented. As a basic experiment for an optimum condition design, an penetration performance was compared by external device shape. To evaluate the result of an experiment, image analysis was carried out after obtaining the model by using the liquid rubber for the penetrated steel plate. To simulate the penetrating process of shaped charge, the AUTODYN program has been used. As a result of analysis, while the average penetration depth of circular and square shaped external devices were similar, the penetration quality was more uniform in the case of circle. In addition, water infiltration occurred in square case, displacement and strain rate according to the increase of the water pressure were measured high.

수중 강재 절단을 위해 내압성, 유연성의 외부장치인 스프링 호스와 가소성 성형폭약을 결합한 수중 성형폭약 장치를 고안하였다. 최적조건 설계를 위한 기초실험으로 외부장치의 형상에 따른 관입성능을 비교하였다. 실험결과를 평가하기 위하여 관입 된 강재에 액상 고무를 이용하여 모형을 획득한 후 이미지 분석을 하였고, 성형폭약의 관입 과정을 모사하기 위해 AUTODYN 프로그램을 이용하여 해석하였다. 분석결과 원형 및 사각 외부장치의 평균 관입 깊이는 유사하였으나 관입품질은 원형의 경우 더 균일하였다. 또한, 사각의 경우 침투현상이 발생하였고, 수압증가에 따른 변위가 원형대비 크게 측정되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 박경준, 양형식, 2004, 성형폭약 설계변수의 통계학적 검토, 화약 . 발파(대한화약발파공학회), Vol.22, No.1, pp. 5-13.
  2. 박광서, 2015, 해양플랜트 해체시장 동향과 도전과제, Offshore Business, 한국해양수산개발원, Vol.21, pp. 5-11.
  3. 석철기, 2014, 성형폭약을 이용한 수중 철골구조물 절단 해체, 제1회 방재전문가 그룹세미나, 인제대학교 방재연구센터.
  4. Brian, T. B., 2014, Determining and mitigating the effects of firing a linear shaped charge under water, Masters theses, Missouri university of science and technology, USA.
  5. Chirs, P., 2005, Penetration of a shaped charge, Doctor theses, Corpus Christi College University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
  6. David, H., 2010, Consequences of coaxial jet penetration performance and shaped charge design criteria, Naval postgraduate school, pp. 24-28.
  7. DEMEX, 2002, Explosive technology report for structure removals in the Gulf of Mexico. Draft. DEMEX, Division of TEi Construction Services, Inc.
  8. Michael, R. and PE. Lindeburg, 2013, Mechanical Engineering Reference Manual for the PE Exam 13 edition, Professional Publications Inc, California, pp. A122-A125.
  9. Ogata, Y., Y. Wada, K. Katsuyama, T. Nishida, M. Hoshino and M. Nagano, 1997, Study on the blasting demolition of steel construction(part 1: Movement of the cutting part), Sci. Tech, Energetic Materials, 58, pp. 116-122.
  10. Paul, W. C., 1996, Explosives Engineering, Wiley-VCH, New York, pp. 185-250.
  11. Wu, H. Y., 2010, Research on application of shaped charge cutting to demolition of steel-structure building, Journal of Hefei Normal University 3, 022.