DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

UN 학교재난안전 고찰

A Review of the United Nations' School Disaster Safety

  • 투고 : 2016.11.01
  • 심사 : 2016.11.22
  • 발행 : 2016.12.31

초록

Purpose: This review aims to provide an understanding of the UN recommendations regarding school disaster safety in the context of Korea's school safety system. Methods: Relevant literature and reports on the UN's school disaster safety were investigated. On basis of the analysis, this review closely examined how the UN school disaster safety had been developed and what it had proposed. Results: Major findings from this review regarding the UN school disaster safety were to: 1) utilize "all-hazards approach"; 2) focus on "community-based approach"; 3) explore "education for sustainable development"; and 4) emphasize "informal disaster safety education." Conclusion: This review on the UN school disaster safety may give a critical implication to Korea's school safety education.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Vanderveken A. The EM-DAT higher resolution disaster data [Internet]. Brussels: CRED; 2016 [cited 2016 October 9]. Available from: http://cred.be/sites/default/files/CredCrunch43.pdf
  2. United Nations, International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. Towards a Culture of Prevention: Disaster Risk Reduction Begins a School [Internet]. Geneva: UN/ISDR; 2007 [cited 2016 October 18]. Available from: http://www.unisdr.org/files/761_education-good-practices.pdf
  3. World Health Organization, The Emergency and Humanitarian Action. Disaster & Emergencies Definitions [Internet]. Addis Ababa: WHO/EHA ; 2002 [cited 2016 October 21]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/disasters/repo/7656.pdf
  4. Alexander D. The study of natural disasters, 1977-1997: some reflection on a changing field of knowledge. Disasters. 1997;21(4):284-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-7717.00064
  5. Basher R. Global early warning systems for natural hazards: systematic and people-centred. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society. 2006;364:2167-2182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2006.1819
  6. Ansell J, Wharton F. Risk: analysis, assessment, management. First edition. New Jersey: Wiley; 1992. p. 5-98
  7. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. Hyogo framework for action 2005-2015: building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters [Internet]. Geneva: UNISDR; 2005. [cited 2016 October 15]. Available from: http://www.unisdr.org/files/1037_hyogoframeworkforactionenglish.pdf
  8. United Nations. Accelerating and main streaming disaster risk reduction efforts on the United Nations intensified approach [Internet]. Geneva: UNISDR; 2015 [cited 2016 October 15]. Available from: http://www.unisdr.org/files/45550_acceleratingmainstreamingdrrefforts.pdf.
  9. Prior T, Roth F. Global Disaster Politics Post Sendai. CSS Analyses in Security Policy. 2015 May 1:1-4.
  10. The United Nations Children's Fund, the Inter-agency Network for Education in Emergencies, The International Federation of Red Cross, The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, World Vision, et al. Comprehensive School Safety [Internet]. New York: UNICEF; 2013 [cited 2016 October 11]. Available from: http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/SC/pdf/Comprehensive_school_safety.pdf
  11. Petal M. Disaster Prevention for Schools Guidance for Education Sector Decision-Makers Consultation version [Internet]. Geneva: UNISDR; 2008 [cited 2016 October 20]. Available from: https://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/publications/7556
  12. the Inter-agency Network for Education in Emergencies. Minimum standards for education: Preparedness, response, recovery [Internet]. New York: IMEE; 2010 [cited 2016 October 11]. Available from: http://toolkit.ineesite.org/toolkit/INEEcms/uploads/1012/INEE_GuideBook_EN_2012%20LoRes.pdf
  13. Shaw R, Takeuchi Y, Shiwaku K, Fernandez G, Gwee QR, Yang B. 1-2-3 of disaster education [Internet]. Kyoto: European Union, ISDR, Kyoto University; 2009 [cited 2016 October 25]. Available from: http://www.unisdr.org/files/12088_123sm.pdf
  14. World Health Organization. Risk reduction and emergency preparedness [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2007 [cited 2016. October 22]. Available from: http://www.who.int/hac/techguidance/preparedness/emergency_preparedness_eng.pdf
  15. Canton LG. "All-hazards" Doesn't Mean "Plan for Everything" All-hazards planning requires a risk-based approach [Internet]. Emergency Management; 2013 [cited 2016 October 26]. Available from: http://www.emergencymgmt.com/emergency-blogs/manag ing-crisis/Allhazards-Doesnt-Mean-Plan-for-Everything.html
  16. Stephens KM. All Hazards Preparedness Guide [Internet]. Atlanta: CDC; 2013 [cited 2016 October 12]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/phpr/documents/ahpg_final_march_2013.pdf
  17. U.S. Department of Education, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Federal Emergency Management Agency. Guide for Developing High-Quality School Emergency Operations Plans [Internet]. Washington: U.S. Department of Education; 2013 [cited 2016 October 19]. Available from: http://rems.ed.gov/docs/REMS_k-12_Guide_508.pdf
  18. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. The second basic plan for promotion of education [Internet]. Tokyo: Government of Japan MEXT; 2013 [cited 2016 October 16]. Available from: http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/keikaku/detail/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2013/06/20/1336379_01_1.pdf.
  19. Kafle SK, Murshed Z. Community-based disaster risk management for local authorities [Internet]. Klong Luang Pathumthani, Thailand: Asian Disaster Preparedness Center; 2006 [cited 2016 October 22]. Available from: http://www.unisdr.org/files/3366_3366CBDRMShesh.pdf
  20. Lindberg H, Sundelius B. Whole-of-Society Disaster Resilience. In: Kamien D, editor(s). The McGraw-Hill Homeland Security Handbook: Strategic guidancce for a coordinatated approach to effective security and emergency management. Second edition. Columbus: The McGraw-Hill Homeland Companies; 2012. p. 1295-1297.
  21. Suganuma K. Recent Trends in Earthquake Disaster Management in Japan. Quarterly Review. 2006 April 19:91-106
  22. Bilham R. Lessons from the haiti earthquake. Nature International weekly journal of science 463. 2010 February 17:878-879.
  23. The United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. Knowledge for Life: UN launches search for communities good at managing the risk of disasters. 2015 July 28:1.
  24. Wals A. Review of contexts and structures for education for sustainable development [Internet]. Paris: UNESCO; 2009 [cited 2016 October 12]. Available from: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001849/184944e.pdf
  25. Scribner S, Cole M. Cognitive Consequences of Formal and Informal Education. Science. 1973;182:553-559. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.182.4112.553
  26. International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. Leaders of Indonesia's Simeulue community received a prestigious UN award [Internet]. Bangkok: ISDR; 2005 [cited 2016 October 16]. Available from: http://www.unisdr.org/files/5602_IndonesiacommunityUNaward.pdf
  27. Petal MA, Izadkhah YO. Formal and informal education for disaster risk reduction [Internet]. Islamabad: Risk RED; 2008 [cited 2016 October 14]. Available from: http://www.riskred.org/activities/ddredislamabad.pdf
  28. Gee J P. What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillian; 2003. p. 1-12.
  29. Lin SC, Tsai MH, Chang YL, Kang SC. Game-initiated learning: A case study for disaster education research in Taiwan. 2013 Spring Symposium Series; 2013 March 25-27; Palo Alto California. Conference Paper 2013 AAAI Spring Symposium: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence; 2013. p. 67-71.
  30. Selby D, Kagawa F. Disaster Risk Reduction in School Curricula: Case Studies from Thirty Countries [Internet]. Spain: UN ESCO, UNICEF; 2012 [cited 2016 October 26]. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/education/files/DRRinCurricula-Mapping30countriesFINAL.pdf

피인용 문헌

  1. 유엔의 재난위험 감소 추진체계 및 전략의 시사점 vol.11, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.15207/jkcs.2020.11.1.211