대한감각통합치료학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Sensory Integration)

  • 제13권1호
  • /
  • Pages.45-56
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 1738-0405(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-115X(eISSN)
대한감각통합치료학회 (Korean Academy of Sensory Integration)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

대한감각통합치료학회지의 연구동향: 2003년부터 2014년까지의 연구를 중심으로

An Analytical Study on Research Trends in Journal of Korean Academy of Sensory Integration : From 2003 to 2014

  • 정남해 (백석대학교 보건학부 작업치료학과) ;
  • 장문영 (인제대학교 의생명공학대학 작업치료학과)
  • Jung, Nam-Hae (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Division of Health Science, Baekseok University) ;
  • Chang, Moonyoung (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, College of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Inje University)
  • 투고 : 2015.07.30
  • 심사 : 2015.09.04
  • 발행 : 2015.09.11
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적 : 본 연구는 대한감각통합치료학회지의 연구 분야와 동향을 분석하여 나아갈 방향을 모색하고자 학회지가 발간된 2003년부터의 연구를 분석하였다. 연구 방법 : 2003년부터 2014년까지 학회지에 수록된 97개 연구의 형태 및 동향, 근거수준, 대상자, 연구비 지원 수혜 연구의 비율, 연구영역을 분석하였다. 결과 : 매 5년마다 연구 형태는 실험연구 비율이 가장 높았고, 실험연구와 고찰연구가 꾸준히 증가하는 추세이다. 질적 수준을 살펴보면, 단일 집단 비무작위 연구가 가장 많았고, 다음은 사례 연구이었다. 연구 대상자는 장애아동을 대상으로 한 연구가 가장 많았는데, 그 중 전반적 발달장애와 발달지연, 지적장애 순으로 많았다. 대상자의 연령은 초등학생, 유아 순으로 많았으며, 대상자 수는 10명 이하가 가장 많았다. 2008년 이후 수록된 전체 연구 중 연구비 지원 수혜 대상 연구는 50%이었다. 표준화된 평가 중심으로 연구영역을 살펴보면, 감각조절, 상호작용, 발달 순으로 많았고, 비표준화된 평가 중심으로 분석한 결과 행동관찰과 임상관찰 순으로 많았다. 결론 : 높은 근거 수준의 연구와 다양한 연구 방법을 사용한 연구가 활발히 이루어져야 하며, 국내에서 사용할 수 있는 감각통합을 측정하는 민감도가 높은 체계적인 평가도구의 개발이 필요하다. 이를 통해, 궁극적으로는 작업치료의 근거중심실행을 하는데 이바지 할 수 있을 것이다.

Purpose : This study aimed to critically analyze published research papers in Journal of Korean Academy of Sensory Integration and to investigate the research field and trends. Methods : Types of studies, research trends, levels of evidence, participants, funding sources and research areas were analyzed and described by using 97 selected studies published between 2003 and 2014. Results : Every 5 years, the most frequent type of study was experimental research. The numbers of experimental studies and review studies have been increasing. The most frequent level of evidence was one group non-randomized study, followed by case reports. The highest percentage of participants were children with disability and the most common diagnoses were pervasive developmental disorder, developmental delay and intellectual disabilities. Most of the participants was elementary school students and the most frequent sample size was below 10. The percentage of research grant from Korean Academy of Sensory Integration has been over 50% since 2008. The research areas focusing on the standardized assessments were mostly sensory modulation, interaction and development and the non-standardized assessments were behavior observation and clinical observation. Conclusion : Higher level of studies and comprehensive research methods will be needed. The standardized assessment tools with the high sensibility on sensory integration which developed in the domestic need to be developed. Thus, it will be able to contribute to the evidence based practice in occupational therapy.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Anderson, E. M., Tang, J. J., & Barney, K. F. (2006). The importance of occupational therapy contributions to health services research. OTJR: Occupation, Participation, and Health, 26(3), 104-116.
  2. Arbesman, M., Scheer, J., & Lieberman, D. (2008). Using AOTA's critically appraised topic (CAT) and critically appraised paper (CAP) series to link evidence to practice. OT Practice, 13(5), 18-22.
  3. Baranek, G. T., Foster, L. G., & Berkson, G. (1997). Sensory defensiveness in person with developmental disabilities. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 17, 173-185. https://doi.org/10.1177/153944929701700302
  4. Case-Smith, J., & Powell, C. A. (2008). Research literature in occupational therapy, 2001-2005. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(4), 480-486. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.62.4.480
  5. Daly, J., Willis, K., Small, R., Green, J., Welch, N., Kealy, M., et al. (2007). A hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 43-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.014
  6. Kim, K. M. (2003). Historical review of sensory integration in Korea. Journal of Korean Society of Sensory Integration Therapists, 1(1), 73-79.
  7. Korean Academy of Sensory Integration. (2007). Looking back- The history of Korean Academy of Sensory Integration. Journal of Korean Society of Sensory Integration Therapists, 5(1), 65-69.
  8. Lieberman, D., & Scheer, J. (2002). AOTA's evidence-based literature review project: An overview. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 344-349. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.56.3.344
  9. Lloyd-Smith, W. (1997). Evidence-based practice and occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60, 474-478. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802269706001103
  10. Marshall, M., Lockwood, A., Bradley, C., Adams, C., Joy, C., & Fenton, M. (2000). Unpublished rating scales: A major source of bias in randomised controlled trials of treatments for schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 176(3), 249-252. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.176.3.249
  11. O'Brien, J. C., Hussey, S. M., & Sabonis-Chafee, B. (2012). Introduction to occupational therapy. Missouri: Elsevier.
  12. Robert, K. Y. (2009). Case study research: design and methods. London: SAGE.
  13. Sackett, D. L., Straus, S. E., Richardson, W. S., Rosenberg, W., & Haynes, R. B. (2000). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. London: Churchill Livingstone.
  14. Salter, K. L., Teasell, R. W., Foley, N. C., & Jutai, J. W. (2007). Outcome assessment in randomized controlled trials of stroke rehabilitation. American Journal of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 86(12), 1007-1012. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181587b3d
  15. Sandelowski, M. (2004). Using qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 14(1), 1366-1866. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732304269672
  16. Shumway-Cook, A. & Horak, F. B. (1986). Assessing the influence of sensory interaction of balance. Suggestion from the field. Physical Therapy, 66(10), 1548-1550. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/66.10.1548
  17. Wikipedia. (2015. 7. 25.). Sensory processing disorder. 24 August, 2013. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sensory_processing_disorder.
  18. Yoo, E. Y., Lee, J. S., Lee, J. Y., Park, H. Y., & Yoo, J. E. (2011). Research literature in Korean occupational therapy by using a Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 19(1), 29-41.