한국산업보건학회지 (Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene)

  • 제25권2호
  • /
  • Pages.115-125
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 2384-132X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2289-0564(eISSN)
한국산업보건학회 (Korean Industrial Hygiene Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

물질안전보건자료 및 표시제도의 개선 방향 제안(2) - 유럽연합의 CLP 제도 고찰에 근거하여

How to Improve the Reliability of MSDS and Labels?(2): A Review on the EU CLP(REGULATION(EC) No 1272/2008)

  • Kim, Shinbum (Wonjin Institute for Occupational & Environmental Health) ;
  • Lee, Yun Keun (Wonjin Institute for Occupational & Environmental Health) ;
  • Choi, Youngeun (Wonjin Institute for Occupational & Environmental Health)
  • 투고 : 2015.06.02
  • 심사 : 2015.06.20
  • 발행 : 2015.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objectives: The major objectives of this study are to review the EU CLP Regulations to propose ways of improving the reliability of MSDS and labels. Methods: To review the EU CLP Regulations, we used EU documents including directives and regulations on chemical management. In addition, we used EU governmental agency reports to illuminate the history and background of the CLP. We found the EU CLP's instruments for reliable hazard communication and evaluated the operations of the instruments. Results: EU CLP Regulations have four instruments for the EU CLP Regulations to make hazard communication reliable. These instruments are GHS, the harmonized CMR and respiratory sensitive substances classification list, C&L inventory and restriction of trade secrets. These are highly useful for achieving the objectives of REACH and CLP(no data-no market and changing the burden of proof). Conclusions: Changing the burden of proof is a key principle for achieving a society safe from hazardous chemicals. Chemical manufacturers and importers alone should bear the responsibility for reliable MSDS. We recommend benchmarking the EU CLP Regulations in order to change efficiently the burden of proof. Trade secrets should be limited to low-hazard substances and be approved by the government before the chemical product is on the market. Like the C&L inventory, chemical product information including substances identification and hazard properties should be notified, aggregated and be opened to public on the Internet. Finally, we recommend a MSDS registration system once again.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Cho YD, Byun SW, Choe EK, Kim SH. EU environmental prohibition on hazardous substances and Its impacts on international trades of Korea companies. Clean Technol 2012;18(1):1-13 https://doi.org/10.7464/ksct.2012.18.1.001
  2. European Council(EC). COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 67/548/ EEC. 1967
  3. European Council(EC). COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 76/769/ EEC. 1976
  4. European Council(EC). COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 88/379 /EEC. 1988
  5. European Council(EC). Regulation(EEC) 793/93. 1993
  6. European Commission(EC). Commission working document: Report on the operation of Dir. 67/548, Dir. 88/379, Reg 793/93 and Dir. 76/769. 1998
  7. European Commission(EC). Communication from the commission on the precautionary principle. 2000
  8. European Commission(EC). White paper: Strategy for a future chemicals policy. 2001
  9. European Commission(EC). Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals(REACH). Regulation(EC) No 1907/2006. 2006
  10. European Commission(EC). Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, and amending Directive 67/548/EEC and Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006. 2007
  11. European Council(EC). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on CLP - Information from the presidency on the state of play. 2007
  12. European Commission(EC). Proposal for a regulation on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures: Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals(GHS) and its incorporation into community legislation. 2008
  13. European Parliament & European Council(EP & EC. REGULATION(EC) No 1272/2008. 2008
  14. ECHA(European Chemicals Agency). Guidance on the Application of the CLP Criteria. 2013a
  15. ECHA(European Chemicals Agency). Multi-Annual Work Programme 2014-2018. 2013b
  16. Fanghella PDP, Catone T. The CLP Regulation: origin, scope and evolution. Ann Ist Super Sanita 2011;47(2): 126-131
  17. Kim SB, Lee YK, Choi YE. How to improve the reliability of MSDS and labels ?: A critical review on the U.S. Standard 29 CFR Part 1910 Hazard Communication. Journal of Korean Occup Environ Hyg 2015;25(1): 1-12 https://doi.org/10.15269/JKSOEH.2015.25.1.1
  18. Lee KS, Jo JH, Choi JH, Choi SB, Lee JH. A study on the ways of improving the reliability of MSDS written and controlled in workplaces. KOSHA. 2007
  19. Lee KS. Roundtable Presentation of 2015 Korean Industrial Hygiene Association Conference. 2015
  20. Petry T, Knowles R, Meads R. An analysis of the proposed REACH regulation. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2006; 44(1):24-32 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2005.07.007
  21. Schoning G. Classification & Labelling Inventory : role of ECHA and notification requirements. Ann Ist Super Sanita 2011;47(2):140-145
  22. VROM(Netherlands Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning, and Environment). European inspection project "Solid enforcement of substances in Europe": Final report. 1998
  23. VROM(Netherlands Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning, and Environment). European inspection project on the notification of new substances: Final Report. 1996
  24. Yim SC, Kang MH. Issues of REACH compliance for chemical industry and case studies. Samsung SDS J IT Serv 2010;7(2):159-177

피인용 문헌

  1. Issue Analysis on 'Trade Secret Claim' in 「Chemicals Control Act」 and 「Amendment on Occupational Safety and Health Act(1917-227)」 vol.25, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.15269/JKSOEH.2015.25.4.433