Objectives: This study analyzes human-error-induced incidents during railway shunting operations performed by transport workers. It uses the Human Error Analysis for Railway (HEAR) framework to identify dominant error types, causal patterns, and severity. Methods: We reviewed Korea Railroad Corporation (KORAIL) investigation reports from 2012-2021. "Incidents" followed ILO/ISO 45001 usage and included accidents and near-misses. Shunting cases were isolated and coded by HEAR error type, simplified causal category, and outcome. The rating of severity (0-4: none, delay, property damage, injury, fatality) enabled cross-field comparisons. Results: Human-error incidents by field were: driving/operation 48.1%; facilities 21.5%; operations 17.8%; electrical 10.0%; and control 2.6%. Shunting accounted for 9.3%, but had the highest mean severity. In shunting, decision-making errors predominated (66.7%), followed by situation-assessment (21.7%), perception (8.3%), and execution (3.3%). Causes were chiefly work-method related (90.0%). Outcomes were mainly worker injury (83.3%), followed by train-operation faults (10.0%), derailments (3.3%), collisions (1.7%), and power-supply failures (1.7%). Conclusions: Despite reductions in overall accidents, yard shunting has been under-managed and requires focused control. Three priority conclusions are proposed: (1) strengthen personnel management and task-specific training for shunting staff (braking distance, hose handling, speed moderation, stop-signal timing), and standardize briefings, closed-loop communication, cross-checks, and human-factors-based procedures by using a data-driven learning system; (2) reinforce safety systems by upgrading to multi-party two-way radios (e.g., TRS/Infomobile) and deploying approach alarms and switch misalignment pre-detection sensors; (3) implement scientific programs to detect and mitigate individual vulnerabilities-self-assessment of error-proneness, boredom, fatigue, and stress; periodic screening with redeployment, rest, and counseling; and feedback training that links personal factors to organizational barriers.