DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Constraint and Supporting Features of Mobile Social Networking Games(SNGs) on User's Satisfaction

모바일 소셜 네트워크 게임의 제약과 지원 기능이 사용자의 만족에 미치는 영향

  • Received : 2015.03.25
  • Accepted : 2015.05.15
  • Published : 2015.07.28

Abstract

From the era of feature phone to the current smart phone which bloomed Social Network Games(SNGs), mobile games have held the top position as killer contents of mobile market. Mobile game has many constraints such as specification of device, network status, and external environment. Based on common perspective of game research, these factors have negative influences on flow of user. Even with these opinions, most mobile gamers have felt satisfaction. To explain this phenomenon, our research focuses on the constraints. Referring to theoretical concepts, we attempt to clarify the relationship between game features and flow through survey methodology. Our finding shows that the constraints have a positive effect on flow even though it disaccords with previous studies. Therefore, we argue that users of mobile game have sense of satisfaction not a cognitive overload as discomforts.

피쳐폰 시대부터 최근 소셜 네트워크 게임(SNG)의 광풍에 이르기까지 모바일 게임은 모바일 폰의 킬러 콘텐츠로써, 큰 시장 규모와 매출을 자랑하고 있다. 게임 분야의 연구 관점에서 보았을 때, 모바일 게임은 플레이 기기의 스펙부터 플레이 환경까지 사용자에게 제약이 많이 주어지므로, 사용자 만족도에 부정적일 것이라는 예측을 할 수 있다. 그러나 대다수의 모바일 게임 사용자는 게임 경험에 굉장히 만족하고 있다. 이에 따라, 제약이라는 개념에 주목하였다. 또한 제약과 지원이라는 개념을 동시에 독립 변수로 설정하고, 이러한 요인이 사용자의 몰입과 만족에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지 설문조사 방법론을 통해 검증하고자 하였다. 분석 결과, 모바일 게임에서는 제약이 몰입에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며, 제약을 통해 불편함을 느끼는 것이 아니라 만족감을 얻을 수 있음을 확인하였다. 이를 통해 향후 모바일 게임의 UX 디자인 과정에서 해당 연구들의 결과를 활용할 수 있으리라 기대한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Amabile, "Effects of external evaluation on artistic creativity," Journal of personality and Social Psychology, Vol.37, No.2, p.221, 1979. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.2.221
  2. Baer and Oldham, "The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.91, No.4, p.963, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.963
  3. Bagozzi and Yi, "On the evaluation of structural equation models," Journal of the academy of marketing science, Vol.16, No.1, pp.74-94, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
  4. Barclay, Higgins, and Thompson, "The partial least squares(PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration," Technology studies, Vol.2, No.2, pp.285-309, 1995.
  5. Cagan and Vogel, Creating breakthrough products: Innovation from product planning to program approval, Ft Press, 2002.
  6. Chernev, "When more is less and less is more: The role of ideal point availability and assortment in consumer choice," Journal of consumer Research, Vol.30, No.2, pp.170-183, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1086/376808
  7. Cropley, "In praise of convergent thinking," Creativity research journal, Vol.18, No.3, pp.391-404. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1803_13
  8. Csikszentmihalyi and Csikzentmihaly, Flow: The psychology of optimal experience(Vol.41) New York: HarperPerennial, 1991.
  9. Csikszentmihalyi, Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention, HarperPerennial, New York, 1997.
  10. Draper and Blair, "Workload, flow, and telepresence during teleoperation," In Robotics and Automation, 1996 IEEE International Conference, Vol.2, pp.1030-1035, 1996.
  11. Falk and Miller, A Primer for Soft Modeling University of Akron Press, Akron, OH, 1992.
  12. Faul, Erdfelder, Lang, and Buchner, "G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences," Behavior Research Methods, Vol.39, pp.175-191, 2007. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
  13. Fornell and Bookstein, "Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory," Journal of Marketing research, Vol.19, No.4, pp.440-452, 1982. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151718
  14. Gefen and Straub, "The relative importance of perceived ease of use in IS adoption: a study of e-commerce adoption," Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol.1, No.1, p.8, 2000.
  15. Hair Jr, Anderson, Tatham, and Black, Multivariate Data Analysis, Second Indian Reprint, 2005.
  16. Hou, Nam, Peng, and Lee, "Effects of screen size, viewing angle, and players' immersion tendencies on game experience," Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.28, No.2, pp.617-623, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.007
  17. Iyengar and Lepper, "When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing?," Journal of personality and social psychology, Vol.79, No.6, pp.995, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.995
  18. Jang and Namkung, "Perceived quality, emotions, and behavioral intentions: Application of an extended Mehrabian-Russell model to restaurants," Journal of Business Research, Vol.62, No.4, pp.451-460, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.038
  19. Jarvinen and Aki, "Workshop: Game design for social networks," In Proceedings of the 13th international MindTrek conference: Everyday life in the ubiquitous era, 2009.
  20. Joyce, The blank page: effects of constraint on creativity, 2009.
  21. Keil, Tan, Wei, and Saarinen, "A Cross-Cultural Study on Escalation of Commitment Behavior in Software Projects," MIS Quarterly, Vol.24, No.2, pp.299-325, 2000. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250940
  22. Kramer, Wiegmann, and Kirlik, Attention: From theory to practice, Oxford University Press, Inc., 2006.
  23. Lee and See, "Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance," Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Vol.46, No.1, pp.50-80, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.1.50.30392
  24. Magnusson, "Designing constraints: Composing and performing with digital musical systems," Computer Music Journal, Vol.34, No.4, pp.62-73, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1162/COMJ_a_00026
  25. McGraw and McCullers, "Evidence of a detrimental effect of extrinsic incentives on breaking a mental set," Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol.15, No.3, pp.285-294, 1979. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(79)90039-8
  26. Miyata and Norman, "Psychological issues in support of multiple activities," User centered system design: New perspectives on human-computer interaction, pp.265-284, 1986.
  27. Oliver, "Measurement and evaluation of satisfaction processes in retail settings," Journal of retailing, Vol.57, No.3, pp.25-48, 1981.
  28. Peters and O'Connor, "Situational constraints and work outcomes: The influences of a frequently overlooked construct," Academy of Management Review, Vol.5, No.3, pp.391-397, 1980. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1980.4288856
  29. Posner and Petersen, The attention system of the human brain(No.TR-89-1), WASHINGTON UNIV ST LOUIS MO DEPT OF NEUROLOGY, 1989.
  30. Powell, Finkelstein, Hicks, Phifer, Charugulla, Thornton, and Dahlberg, "SNAG: social networking games to facilitate interaction," In CHI'10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp.4249-4254, 2010.
  31. Schwartz, The paradox of choice, New York: Ecco, 2004a
  32. Stokes, "Variability, constraints, and creativity: Shedding light on Claude Monet," American Psychologist, Vol.56, No.4, p.355, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.4.355
  33. Stokes, "Using constraints to generate and sustain novelty," Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, Vol.1, No.2, p.107, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.1.2.107
  34. Sweetser and Wyeth, "GameFlow: a model for evaluating player enjoyment in games," Computers in Entertainment(CIE), Vol.3, No.3, p.3, 2005.
  35. Wang, Lawless-Reljic, Davies, and Callaghan, "Social presence in immersive 3D virtual learning environments," In Ambient Intelligence -Software and Applications, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp.59-67, 2011.
  36. Wasko and Faraj, "Why Should I Share?: Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice," MIS Quarterly, Vol.29, No.1, pp.35-57, 2005. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148667
  37. Zuckerman, "Sensation seeking and sports," Personality and individual differences, Vol.4, No.3, pp.285-292, 1983.
  38. 김영도, "선택제약 위반을 활용한 문화콘텐츠의 네이밍 창작", 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제10권, 제12호, pp.164-172, 2010.
  39. 김재민, 이영주, 이혜원, "모바일 소셜 네트워크 게임의 아이템 구매의도에 영향을 주는 요인", 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제14권, 제1호, pp.165-178, 2014. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2014.14.01.165
  40. 김종찬, 송승근, "소셜 네트워크게임의 성공요소 분석", 한국정보통신학회논문지, 제14권, 제11호, pp.2586-2592, 2010. https://doi.org/10.6109/JKIICE.2010.14.11.2586
  41. 김진우, 경험 디자인, 안그라픽스, 2014.
  42. 박성원, 이치형, "소셜네트워크 게임 사용자의 만족에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구", 한국컴퓨터게임학회논문지, 제26권, 제1호, pp.197-204, 2013.
  43. 신지호, "게임화 (Gamification) 된 광고 플랫폼으로서 모바일 소셜네트워크게임 (SNG) 의 활용", 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제13권, 제4호, pp.86-96, 2013. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2013.13.04.086
  44. 우종우, 김대령, "액션 스크립트 기반의 소셜 네트워크 게임엔진의 개발", 인터넷정보학회논문지, 제13권, 제1호, pp.125-134, 2012. https://doi.org/10.7472/JKSII.2012.13.1.125
  45. 유일, 김소라, "구조방정식을 이용한 대학졸업예정자들의 구직의도 영향요인 및 인과구조 분석", 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제13권, 제11호, pp.198-212, 2013. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2013.13.11.198
  46. 이국용, "소셜 네트워크 게임의 이용자 만족, 습관, 중독과 지속이용의 관계", 대한경영학회 학술 발표대회 발표논문집, pp.325-339, 2013.
  47. 이석훈, 김재운, "초등학생 방과후 스포츠 활동 참여에 따른 제약 인식 분석", 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제12권, 제6호, pp.466-474, 2012. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2012.12.06.466
  48. 이창신, 오규환, "멀티 플레이 지원 게임의 온라인 게임 전환을 위한 디자인 이슈 연구", 한국컴퓨터게임학회논문지, 제24권, 제4호, pp.153-162, 2011.
  49. 전경란, "소셜 게임의 구조와 특징에 대한 연구", 한국게임학회논문지, 제11권, 제6호, pp.13-22, 2011.
  50. 정규만, "모바일 게임 산업 발전에 관한 연구", 한국컴퓨터게임학회논문지", 제2권, 제20호, pp.135-140, 2010
  51. 정혜승, "온라인 커뮤니티가 비디오 게임 플레이에 미치는 영향에 관한 분석 : 게임 '동물의 숲' 을 중심으로", 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제8권, 제6호, pp.89-97, 2008. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2008.8.6.089
  52. 한국방송통신전파진흥원, 모바일게임 이용행태보고서, 2014.
  53. http://www.businessinsider.com.au/the-socialgaming-market-will-explode-to-5-billion-by-2015-2012-2
  54. http://venturebeat.com/2013/10/29/the-mobile-opportunity-global-mobile-games-market-todouble-by-2016/
  55. http://venturebeat.com/2015/02/19/mobilegaming-in-public-markets-lets-take-stock/
  56. http://funmobee.gamechosun.co.kr/board/news_view.php?bid=news&num=7745&page=83
  57. http://www.newstomato.com/ReadNews.aspx?no=491789
  58. http://www.hankyung.com/news/app/newsview.php?aid=201309242456v
  59. 측정 도구 상세 http://ka.do/DgEq
  60. G-Power를 이용한 최소 표본 검증 값 http://ka.do/7FHP