DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Computational Thinking 증진을 위한 학습자 중심의 교수학습 전략의 효과

Effects of Teaching and Learning Strategies of Learner-Centered Learning for Improving Computational Thinking

  • 김수환 (총신대학교 교양교직과)
  • 투고 : 2015.07.27
  • 심사 : 2015.08.28
  • 발행 : 2015.09.30

초록

본 연구의 목적은 SW 교육의 목표인 Computational Thinking(CT)의 증진을 위한 학습자 중심의 교수학습 전략을 적용하고 그 효과성을 검증하는 것이다. 컴퓨터 비전공자들이 CT를 증진하기 위해서는 쉽고 재미있는 교육내용과 함께 적절한 교수학습 전략이 적용되어야 한다. 본 연구에서는 컴퓨터 비전공자를 위한 CT 교육에서의 학습자 중심의 교수학습 전략인 협력, 공유, 자기주도학습 등의 요소를 적용하고 그 효과성을 검증하였다. 연구 결과 CT 교육에서 학습자 중심의 교수학습 전략은 컴퓨터 비전공 학습자들의 재미와 흥미에 영향을 주었고, 이는 후속 학습의도에 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구에서 적용한 학습자 중심의 교수학습 전략은 CT 교육에서 효과적인 교수학습 전략으로 활용할 수 있다.

The purpose of this study is to verify the effectiveness of teaching and learning strategies of learner-centered learning for the computational thinking that is the educational purpose of SW education. For improving computational thinking, funny and easy educational contents and appropriate teaching and learning strategies are needed. In this study, I applied and verified the learner-centered strategies for non-computer major learners in computational thinking education: collaboration, sharing, self-directed learning. As the result, the teaching and learning of learner-centered learning affects the pleasure and the interest of learners; they affect computational thinking efficacy; it affects intention to use. It is able to apply this learner-centered learning strategies to computational thinking education as an effective educational strategies.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Brennan, K., Balch, C., Chung, M. (2015). Creative Computing Guide Book (traslated by Han, S. G., Kim, S. H. et al.). Seoul: Purple (Original Book Published in 2014).
  2. Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. Paper presented at annual American Educational Research Association meeting, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  3. Choi, H. S. (2014). Developing Lessons and Rubrics to Promote Computational Thinking. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 18(1), 57-64. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2014.18.1.57
  4. CSTA & ISTE (2011). Operational definition of com putational thinking for K-12 Education. Retrieved 2015. 7. 14 http://csta.acm.org/Curriculum/sub/CurrFiles/CompThinkingFlyer.pdf
  5. Gong, M., Xu, Y., & Yu, Y. (2004). An enhanced technology acceptance model for web-based learning. Journal of Information Systems Education, 15(4), 365-373.
  6. Jenkins, T. (2002). On The Difficulty of Learning to Program. 3rd Annual LTSN-ICS Conference, Loughborough University. 53-58.
  7. KACE & NIPA (2014). Report of Management State and Requirements of Domestic and Foreign SW Education.
  8. Kang, I., Choi, J. & Chang, K. (2006). Retrospecting and Prospecting Studies of Constructivism: The comparison of Korean and Western Countries. Journal of Educational Technology, 22(4), 105-135. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.22.4.105
  9. Kim, K. H. et al. (2015). The Study of Development of The Revised Tentative Plan for Information Curriculum. KICE, CRC 2015-17.
  10. Kim, M. S., Park, J., Kim, Y. J. & Oh, H. S. (2002). A Study For Developing Critical Thinking Test (II): Construction of the Test. KICE, RRE 2002-3.
  11. Kim, S. H. (2014). Analysis of Non-Computer Majors' Difficulties in Computational Thinking Education. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 18(3), 49-57.
  12. Kim, S. H. & Han, S. K. (2012). Design-Based Learning for Computational Thinking. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 16(3), 319-326.
  13. Kim, Y. A. et al. (2015). A Study of Development of the Operation Guideline for SW Education. KERIS, CR 2015-3.
  14. Kim, Y. C. (2001). Qualitative Research in Subject Curriculum and Lesson. Moonumsa.
  15. Lee, E. K. (2009). Robot Programming Teaching and Learning Model to Enhance Computational Thinking Ability. Ph. D. thesis, Graduate School of Korea National University of Education.
  16. Nacce & CAS (2014). Computing in the national curriculum: a guide for secondary teachers. Retrieved 2015. 7. 14 http://www.computing atschool.org.uk/data/uploads/cas_secondary.pdf
  17. National Research Council (2011). Report of a Workshop of Pedagogical Aspects of Computational Thinking. Washington, D. C., The National Academies Press.
  18. Noddings, N. (1990). Constructivism in Mathematics Education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Monograph, 4, 7-18. https://doi.org/10.2307/749909
  19. Papert, S. (1980). MINDSTORMS: Children, Computers, and Powerful Idea. Newyork, NY: basic Books, Ins.
  20. Papert, S. & Resnick, M. (1995). Technological Fluency and the Representation of Knowledge. Proposal to the National Science Foundation. MIT Media Laboratory.
  21. Park, J. H. (2015). Effects of Storytelling Based Software Education on Computational Thinking, Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 19(1), 57-68. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.1.57
  22. So, Y. H. (2006). A Study on Factors Affecting Effective Instruction in the Classroom. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 18(1), 1-22.
  23. Sung, J. S., Kim, S. H. & Kim, H. (2015). Analysis of Art and Humanity Major Learners' Features in Programming Class. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 18(3), 25-35.
  24. Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society, 366, 3717-3725. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0118
  25. Yoon, J. E., Kim, D. & Kwon, O. N. (2015). Teachers' roles of learner-centered classes in domestic mathematics education research. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 15(1), 45-68.

피인용 문헌

  1. 컴퓨팅 사고력(Computational Thinking) 함양을 위한 대학에서의 SW교육에 관한 고찰 vol.14, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14400/jdc.2016.14.4.1
  2. IT 융합교육 활성화를 위한 Computational Thinking 수업 모형 설계 vol.11, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.13067/jkiecs.2016.11.5.511
  3. Computational Thinking에서의 추상화 개념에 대한 고찰 vol.20, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2016.20.6.585
  4. 소프트웨어 교육에서 플립 러닝이 학습동기 및 학습만족도에 미치는 영향 vol.21, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2017.21.6.665
  5. The Effect of Flipped Learning on Problem-Solving Capability in Software Education vol.8, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.4.1052
  6. 온라인 소프트웨어 교육 학습자들의 자기주도학습 유형 분류 및 특징 분석 vol.22, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.32431/kace.2019.22.1.004