DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

AAO Template Morphology Controlled by Variation of Anodizing Condition

양극 산화 조건 변화에 따른 AAO Template Morphology 제어

  • Jo, Ye-Won (Department of Ceramic Engineering, RIGET, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Lee, Sung-Gap (Department of Ceramic Engineering, RIGET, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Kim, Kyeong-Min (Department of Ceramic Engineering, RIGET, Gyeongsang National University)
  • 조예원 (경상대학교 세라믹공학과 그린에너지융합연구소) ;
  • 이성갑 (경상대학교 세라믹공학과 그린에너지융합연구소) ;
  • 김경민 (경상대학교 세라믹공학과 그린에너지융합연구소)
  • Received : 2014.10.05
  • Accepted : 2015.03.17
  • Published : 2015.04.01

Abstract

In this study, the application of biosensor having a large surface area for more effective and AAO (anomic aluminium oxide) template in order to gain concentration and voltage of anodizing process morphology changes to the control of experiments were conducted. The biosensor surface may increase the response characteristics by having a large surface area. So the entrance to a little more efficient wide depth sensing experiment was carried out to obtain a structure body with a branch shape with a large surface area with increasing. Experimental results from the FE-SEM observation was obtained template morphology. As a result, depending on the anodizing time, the depth of the layer of aluminum oxide was found that it was confirmed that the deepening of the pore size changes according to anodizing condition. And measuring the detection performance according to the conditions in the electrolyte and the reaction because of blood using a biosensor measuring sensing property according to the depth of the pore depth is considered that does not have a significant impact.

Keywords

References

  1. H. Masuda and K. Fukuda, Science, 268, 1466 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.268.5216.1466
  2. W. Lee, R. Ji, U. Gösele, and K. Nielsch, Nat. Mater., 5, 741 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1717
  3. J. S. Choi, J. K. Lee, J. H. Lim, and S. J. Kim, J. Korean Ind. Eng. Chem., 19, 249 (2008).
  4. D. H. Kim, S. H. Ryu, H. J. Lee, Y. Y. Park, E. J. Lee, and T. J. Ko, J. Korean Mag. Soc., 20, 5 (2010).
  5. Y. Kim, C. Kim, I. Choi, S. Rengaraj, and J. Yi, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 924 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1021/es0346431
  6. L. Mercier and T. Pinnavaia, J. Adv. Mater., 9, 500 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.19970090611
  7. Y. Kim, P. Kim, C. Kim, and J. Yi, J. Mater. Chem., 13, 2353 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1039/b303049k
  8. Y. Li, W. Z. Jia, Y. Y. Song, and X. H. Xia, Chem. Mater., 19, 5758 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1021/cm071738j
  9. A. M. Jani, D. Losic, and N. H. Voelcker, Prog. Mater. Sci., 58, 636 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.01.002
  10. M. Z. Atashbar and S. Singamaneni, Sensors and Actuators B, 111, 13 (2005).
  11. J. W. Diggle, T. C. Dowine, and C. W. Goulding, Chem. Rev., 69, 365 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr60259a005