한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육 (Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education)

  • 제34권1호
  • /
  • Pages.123-130
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 1598-3099(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-8436(eISSN)
한국초등과학교육학회 (The Korean Elementary Science Education Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

열과 온도 수업에서 나타난 초등학생들의 중간 언어 분석

Analysis of Elementary Students' Interlanguage in Science Class about Heat and Temperature

  • 투고 : 2015.02.07
  • 심사 : 2015.02.26
  • 발행 : 2015.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

For effective science learning, teachers need to rearrange scientific language so that students can understand the contents with their incomplete language resources. Interlanguage is the interplay between everyday language and scientific language. The purpose of the study was to analyze the patterns of interlanguage during 4th grade science class to learn "Heat and Temperature" and to find the features of meaning sharing inside classroom in which a teacher and students participated. The data analysis shows that elementary students' interlanguage has different features compared to scientific language that involves passive voice and content-specialized nouns. Students' interlanguage implied the quality of class community's knowledge-sharing, according to the degree of how students can connect scientific language and everyday language in more effective ways. The implication to elementary science education was discussed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Brown, B. A. (2007). Teaching science as a language: A Content-First approach to science teachings. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(5), 529-553. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20255
  2. Brown, B. A. & Spang, E. (2008). Double talk: Synthesizing everyday and science language in the classroom. Science Education, 92(4), 708-732. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20251
  3. Brown, B. A. & Kloser, M. (2009). A view of the tip of the iceberg: Revisiting conceptual continuities and their implications for science learning A view of the tip of the iceberg: revisiting conceptual, continuities and their implications for science learning. Cult. Stud. of Sci. Education, 4(4), 921-928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-009-9200-y
  4. Brown, B. A. & Ryoo, K. H. (2010). Pathway towards fluency: Using 'disaggregate instruction' to promote science literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 32(11), 1465-1493. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903117921
  5. Choe, H. S., Kim, E. Y., Paik, S. H., Lee, K. J. & Chung, W. H (2001). Investigating elementary students' alternative conceptions of heat and temperature. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 20(1), 123-137.
  6. Gallas, K. (1995). Talking their way into science. Teachers College Press.
  7. Gomez, K. (2007). Negotiating discourses: Sixth-grade students' use of multiple science discourses during a science fair presentation. Linguistics and Education, 18(1), 41-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2007.03.002
  8. Kang, D. H. (2012). The types of interlanguage of middle school students in the process of learning diastrophism. Submitted Master's Thesis, Seoul National University.
  9. Kim, J. Y. (2012). Analysis of interlanguage patterns in science learning. Submitted Master's Thesis, Seoul National University.
  10. Lee, I. Y. (2014). Analysis of interlanguage in teaching heat and temperature to elementary students. Submitted Master's Thesis, Seoul National University of Education.
  11. Lemke, J. L. (1990) Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Abbles Publishing Corporation.
  12. Olander, C. (2010). Towards an interlanguage of biological evolution: Exploring students' talk and writing as an arena for sense-making. Submitted Doctoral Dissertation, University of Gothenburg.
  13. Olander, C. & Ingerman, A. (2011). Towards and interlanguage of talking science: Exploring student's argumentation in relation to authentic language. Journal of Biological Education, 45(3), 158-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2011.591414
  14. Rincke, K. (2010). It's rather like learning a language: Development of talk and conceptual understanding in mechanics lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 229-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500691003615343
  15. Shin, M., Maeng, S. & Kim, C. (2010) A comparative analysis of the linguistic features of texts used in the unit of volcano and earthquake in Korean elementary and secondary school science textbooks. Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 31(1), 36-50. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2010.31.1.036
  16. Yeo, S. & Zadnik, M. (2001). Introductory thermal concept evaluation: Assessing students' understanding. The Physics Teacher, 39, 496. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1424603
  17. Young, R. R. & Nguyen, H. T. (2002). Modes of meaning in high school science. Applied Linguistics, 23(3), 348-372. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/23.3.348
  18. Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, A. S. & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 529-552. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1017