한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육 (Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education)

  • 제34권1호
  • /
  • Pages.109-122
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 1598-3099(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-8436(eISSN)
한국초등과학교육학회 (The Korean Elementary Science Education Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

뇌기반 진화적 접근법에 따른 과학 자유탐구에 대한 초등학교 학생의 인식

Elementary School Students' Perceptions on Free Science Inquiry Activities Applying a Brain-Based Evolutionary Approach

  • 투고 : 2015.01.29
  • 심사 : 2015.02.26
  • 발행 : 2015.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In National Curriculum of Science revised in 2007, free inquiry was newly introduced to increase student's interest in science and to foster creativity by having students make their own curiosity questions and find answers by themselves. The purpose of this study is to analyze elementary school students' perceptions on free science inquiry activities applying a brain-based evolutionary approach. For this study, 106 the fifth grade students participated, and then completed a questionnaire on free inquiry activities according to a brain-based evolutionary science teaching and learning principles. The students performed a series of steps of the Diversifying, Estimating-Evaluating-Executing, and Furthering activities in each of Affective, Behavioral, and Cognitive domains (ABC-DEF approach) and constructed their own free inquiry diary, then the observations by the researcher and interviews with the students were analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively. The major results of the study were as follows: First, the majority of the students perceived the each domain and step positively although a few of them perceived negatively. The reasons perceived as negatively were categorized into two; preference dimension of like or dislike and ability dimension of metacognitive or self-reflective capacity. Also, they perceived the free inquiry experience in the form of ABC-DEF as helpful to understand the nature of scientists' scientific activities. Based on these findings, implications for supporting authentic inquiry in school science are discussed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Baek, J. Y., Lim, C. S. & Kim, J. Y. (2014). Analyses on elementary students' cognitive domain in free science inquiry activities applying a brain-based evolutionary approach. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 33(3), 579-587. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2014.33.3.579
  2. Byun, S. M. & Kim, H. J. (2011). Recognition of free inquiry activity and its effects on the science inquiry ability of middle school students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 31(2), 210-224.
  3. Champagne, A. B., Klopfer, L. E. & Anderson, J. H. (1980). Factors influencing the learning of classical mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 48, 1074-1079. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.12290
  4. Chinn, C. A. & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175-218. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10001
  5. Germann, P. J., Haskins, S. & Auls, S. (1996). Analysis of nine high school biology laboratory manuals: Promoting science inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(5), 475-499. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199605)33:5<475::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-O
  6. Gunstone, R. F. & White, R. T. (1981). Understanding of gravity. Science Education, 65(3), 291-299. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730650308
  7. Gunstone, R. F. (1991). Reconstructing theory from practical experience. In, B. E. Woolnough(ed.). Practical science: The role and reality of practical work in school science. Open University Press. pp. 67-77.
  8. Hodson, D. (1998). Is this what scientists do? Seeking a more authentic science in and beyond the school laboratory. In J. J Wellington(Ed.). Practical work in school science: Which way now? NY: Routledge. pp. 93-108.
  9. Hull, D. L. (1988). Science as a process: An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  10. Hwang, S. W., Kim, H. K., Yoo, J. H. & Pak, S. J. (2001). Ninth graders' self-assessment of scientific process skills in open investigation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 21(3), 506-515.
  11. Jang, S. (2006). Prospective elementary school teachers' perception of inquiry-oriented teaching practice, with an emphasis on students' scientific explanation. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 25(1), 96-108.
  12. Keys, C. W. (2000). Investigating the thinking processes of eighth grade writers during the composition of a scientific laboratory report. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 676-690. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200009)37:7<676::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-6
  13. Kim, C. J., Chae, D. H. & Lim, C. S. (1999). Introduction to science education. Seoul: BooksHill.
  14. Kim, J. Y., Lim, C. S. & Baek, J. Y. (2014). Analyses on elementary students' behavioral domain in free science inquiry activities applying a brain-based evolutionary approach. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 33(3), 579-587. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2014.33.3.579
  15. Kim, K., Kim, S., Kim, N., Park, S., Kim, J., Park, H. & Jung, S. (2008). Characteristics of achievement trend in Korea's middle and high school students from international achievement assessment (TIMSS/PISA)., Research Report RRE 2008-3-1.
  16. Kim, M. K. (2009). The effect of practicing the authentic open inquiry on compositions of laboratory reports. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 29(8), 848-860.
  17. Koo, S. K. & Park, I. W. (2010). Development of science writing teaching strategy and its application to elementary science classes. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 29(4), 427-440.
  18. Lim, C. S. & Oh, Y. H. (2004). Relationships between the emotional states perceived by elementary school children and their memory on science learning experiences. The Korean Journal of Biology Education, 32(2), 173-180.
  19. Lim, C. S. (2009). Development of a model of brainbased evolutionary scientific teaching for the learning. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 29(8), 990-1010.
  20. Lim, C. S. (2012). Development of an instructional model for brain-based evolutionary approach to creative problem solving in science. Biology Education (Korea), 40(4), 429-452. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2012.40.4.429
  21. Lim, C. S., Kim, J. Y. & Baek, J. Y. (2012). Analyses on elementary students' science attitude and topics of interest in free inquiry activities according to a brainbased evolutionary science teaching and learning model. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 31(4), 541-557.
  22. Martin-Hansen, L. (2002). Defining inquiry. The Science Teacher, 69, 34-37.
  23. Ministry of Education and Science Technology (2007). Science curriculum. Ministry of Education and Science Technology Announcement 2007-79 (Supplement 9).
  24. Park, Y. S. (2006). Theoretical study on opportunity of scientific argumentation for implementing authentic scientific inquiry. Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 27(4), 401-415.
  25. Peters, E. (2005). Reforming cookbook labs. Science Scope, 29(3), 16-21.
  26. Shim, K. C., Park, J. S., Park, S. W. & Shin, M. K. (2007). An analysis of science inquiries as presented in elementary science textbooks. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 26(1), 24-31.
  27. Shin, H. H. & Kim, H. N. (2010). Analysis of elementary teachers' and students' views about difficulties on open science inquiry activities. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 29(3), 262-276.
  28. White, R. T. (1996). The link between the laboratory and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 18(7), 761-774. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180703
  29. Yoon, H. G. & Pak, S. J. (2000). The change of middle school students' motivation for investigation through the extended science investigations. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 20(1), 137-154.
  30. Ziman, J. (2000). Real science: What it is, and what it means. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

피인용 문헌

  1. Analyses of Elementary School Students' Interests and Achievements in Science Outdoor Learning by a Brain-Based Evolutionary Approach vol.34, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2015.34.2.252
  2. Unintended Learning in Primary School Practical Science Lessons from Polanyi’s Perspective of Intellectual Passion vol.25, pp.1-2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-015-9788-0
  3. Analyses of the Elementary School Students’ Activities on Topic of ‘Functions of Plant Root’ applying Behavioral Domain-centered Brain-based Evolutionary Approach vol.44, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2016.44.1.167
  4. The Effects of Archery Players’ Sleep Loss and Caffeine Intake on Attention and Stress Hormone vol.18, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.35277/kama.2016.18.1.39
  5. '식물의 한살이' 단원에서 속성배추를 활용한 뇌기반 진화적 접근법이 초등학생의 흥미에 미치는 영향 vol.35, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2016.35.3.336
  6. 뇌기반 진화적 접근법을 적용한 초등학생 수준별 자유탐구 안내자료 개발 및 효과 vol.37, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2018.37.3.233
  7. 초등과학영재학생의 과학지식과 과학창의성의 관계 - 생명 영역을 중심으로 - vol.39, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2020.39.3.382