DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Fundamental Study for Feasibility on Soil Flushing for TPHs-Contaminated Soil Treatment

유류오염토양 정화를 위한 토양세정기술의 적용성 기초연구

  • Kang, Hui-Cheon (Dept. of Env. & Ocean Construction Eng., Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kim, Joung-Dae (Dept. of Health & Env., Hallym Polytechnic University) ;
  • Han, Byeong-Gi (Dept. of Env. & Ocean Construction Eng., Kangwon National University) ;
  • Seo, Seung-Won (Dept. of Env. Business, Dongmyung Ent. Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Shin, Chul-Ho (Seohae Environment Science Institute) ;
  • Park, Joon-Seok (Dept. of Env. & Ocean Construction Eng., Kangwon National University)
  • 강희천 (강원대학교 환경해양건설공학과) ;
  • 김정대 (한림성심대학교 보건환경과) ;
  • 한병기 (강원대학교 환경해양건설공학과) ;
  • 서승원 ((주)동명엔터프라이즈) ;
  • 신철호 ((재)서해환경과학연구소) ;
  • 박준석 (강원대학교 환경해양건설공학과)
  • Received : 2015.11.17
  • Accepted : 2015.12.17
  • Published : 2015.12.30

Abstract

This research was performed to evaluate the feasibility of in situ soil flushing for TPH-contaminated soil remediation. It was conducted in batch test as fundamental research for in situ soil flushing. The 30% of initial TPH concentration was removed by shaking only in batch test. The removal efficiency of TPH in case of groundwater as surfactant dilution solution was approximate 2~6% lower than that of distilled water. Mixing ratio of soil to surfactant solution did not practically effect on the TPH removal efficiency. In the experiment of using single or mixed surfactant solution with 0.1~4.0 wt%, Tween-80, SWA-1503, SWA-1503+SDS showed averagely over 80%. It was determined that the optimum surfactant concentration was 0.1 wt% because there was no significant difference between concentrations of 0.1~4.0 wt%.

본 연구는 실제 유류오염토양을 in situ 토양세정법으로 정화시 기술 적용성을 평가하기 위한 회분식 기초연구로 적정 계면활성제의 종류와 농도를 결정하고자 하였다. 증류수만의 진탕효과로 인한 TPH 제거는 약 30%이었으며, 계면활성제 희석시 사용되는 용액으로는 증류수를 사용한 경우에 비하여 지하수(해수 혼합)의 유입으로 인하여 약 2~6%의 효율저하가 나타났다. 토양과 계면활성제 용액비는 회분식 실험에서 TPH 제거효율에 미치는 영향이 미미하였다. 단독 또는 혼합 계면활성제 농도를 0.1~4.0 wt%까지 변화시켜 세정한 결과 종류별로는 Tween-80, SWA-1503, SWA-1503+SDS에서 평균 제거율이 80% 이상으로 대체적으로 높은 효율을 보였으며, 농도에 따른 차이는 크지 않아 0.1 wt% 농도를 최적 농도로 판단하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Environment, Guideline for remediation technology of oil-contaminated soil (2007).
  2. J. S. Park, Treatment of contaminated soil using soil flushing, Geoenv. Eng, 6(1), 27-32(2005).
  3. K. H. Kim, A study on determination of cleansing agent for TPH contaminated soil, Master thesis, Woosong Univ. (2010).
  4. S. I. Choi, J. H. So, C. H. Cho, A study on the basic characteristics of in-istu soil flushing using surfactant, Kor. Soc. of Soil and Groundwater Env., 7(4), 87-91(2002).
  5. H. J. Moon, Y. K. Lim, Y. K. Kim, C. S. Joo, K. Y. Bang, W. J. Chung, S. W. Lee, A study on remediation of dieselontaminated soil biosurfactant-enhanced soil washing, Kor. Soc. of Soil and Groundwater Env., 7(2), 13-22(2002).
  6. H. Seo, M. Lee, S. Y. Chung, Study of surfactant enhanced remediation methods for organic pollutant(NAPL) distributed over the heterogeneous medium, Kor. Soc. of Soil and Groundwater Env., 6(4), 51-59(2001).
  7. D. H. Kim, Flushing of petroleumcontaminated soil using mixed surfactants, Master thesis, Kyungsung Univ. (2010).
  8. J. U. Park, J. S. Park, C. H. Shin, C. H. Won, S. H. Kim, Treatment of dieselontaminated soil and flushed-olution using soil flushing process and coagulation, J. Kor. Soc. of Waste Manage., 21(6), 588-597(2004).
  9. C. Lee, Y. Jang, Performance of soil flushing for contaminated soil using surfactant, J. of Kor. Geoenv. Soc., 12(6), 17-23(2011).
  10. Ministry of Environment, Development of hybrid remediation system for soil & groundwater pollution (2004).
  11. K. D. Nam, Fundamental physical property of surfactant, Suseowon (1997).

Cited by

  1. 유류오염토양 처리를 위한 컬럼식 토양세정기술 평가 vol.23, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7464/ksct.2017.23.3.302
  2. 비데 세정기의 세척장치에 관한 연구 vol.4, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.21186/ipr.2019.4.1.021