DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Frozen Storage Temperature on the Quality of Premium Ice Cream

  • Park, Sung Hee (Department of Marine Food Science and Technology, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Jo, Yeon-Ji (Department of Bioindustrial Technologies, Konkuk University) ;
  • Chun, Ji-Yeon (Department of Food Bioengineering, Jeju National University) ;
  • Hong, Geun-Pyo (Department of Food Science and Technology, Sejong University) ;
  • Davaatseren, Munkhtugs (Department of Bioresources and Food Science, Konkuk University) ;
  • Choi, Mi-Jung (Department of Bioresources and Food Science, Konkuk University)
  • Received : 2015.05.06
  • Accepted : 2015.10.02
  • Published : 2015.12.31

Abstract

The market sales of premium ice cream have paralleled the growth in consumer desire for rich flavor and taste. Storage temperature is a major consideration in preserving the quality attributes of premium ice cream products for both the manufacturer and retailers during prolonged storage. We investigated the effect of storage temperature (−18℃, −30℃, −50℃, and −70℃) and storage times, up to 52 wk, on the quality attributes of premium ice cream. Quality attributes tested included ice crystal size, air cell size, melting resistance, and color. Ice crystal size increased from 40.3 µm to 100.1 µm after 52 wk of storage at −18℃. When ice cream samples were stored at −50℃ or −70℃, ice crystal size slightly increased from 40.3 µm to 57-58 µm. Initial air cell size increased from 37.1 µm to 87.7 µm after storage at −18℃ for 52 wk. However, for storage temperatures of −50℃ and −70℃, air cell size increased only slightly from 37.1 µm to 46-47 µm. Low storage temperature (−50℃ and −70℃) resulted in better melt resistance and minimized color changes in comparison to high temperature storage (−18℃ and −30℃). In our study, quality changes in premium ice cream were gradually minimized according to decrease in storage temperature up to−50℃. No significant beneficial effect of −70℃ storage was found in quality attributes. In the scope of our experiment, we recommend a storage temperature of −50℃ to preserve the quality attributes of premium ice cream.

Keywords

Introduction

In recent years, market sales of premium ice cream have paralleled the growth in consumer desire for rich flavor and taste. Ice cream is an aerated suspension of crystallized fat and water in a highly concentrated sugar solution; it contains hydrocolloids, casein micelles, and proteins (Eisner, 2005). The grade of ice cream depends on the amount of milk fat content. Generally, ice creams containing more than 12% are recognized as premium level (Choi and Shin, 2014). Fat content in premium ice cream generally ranges from 11% to 15% and the ice cream is 60% to 90% overrun (Goff, 2008). Overrun refers to the amount of air pushed into the ice cream. Premium ice cream tends to be more overrun, which produces a denser, heavier, and creamier structure, and induces richer mouth feel than regular ice cream. The quality attributes of ice cream depend on various factors, including ice crystal size, overrun, initial freezing temperature, and storage temperature. Among these, storage temperature is of particular interest to ice cream manufacturers and retail stores, because the physical characteristics of ice cream associated with mouth feel are greatly influenced by storage temperature (Buyck et al., 2011; Choi and Shin, 2014; Park et al., 2006). In general, the industry standard for ice cream storage is −28.9℃ (Buyck et al., 2011). The International Dairy Foods Association has stated that any ice cream product stored at higher than −28.9℃ has incurred heat-shock damage and should not be sold via retail (Buyck et al., 2011; International Dairy Foods Association, 1997). The final quality of the ice cream product, particularly the smooth texture and the cooling sensation perceived by the consumers, is largely influenced by the size and morphology of the ice crystals and air bubbles (Caillet et al., 2003). Consumers desire small ice crystals (< 55 μm), as they perceive the product to be less icy and sandy in texture (Buyck et al., 2011). Maintaining a uniform distribution of small ice crystals is critical for obtaining a smooth texture and mouthfeel during consumption (Flores and Goff, 1999). Ice creams with small ice crystals experience minimal recrystallization during frozen storage (Choi and Shin, 2014; Trgo et al., 1999). Recrystallization is a result of storage temperature fluctuations that cause some ice crystals to melt and recrystallize freely into larger crystals (Buyck et al., 2011). Appropriate air cell structure in ice cream promotes a light texture and influences melt down (Park et al., 2006). Air cell diameters ranging from 30 to 150 μm, with a mean diameter of 40 μm, is considered as the criteria for good quality ice cream (Caillet et al., 2003; Hagiwara and Hartel, 1996). Air cells tend to coalesce into larger cells at storage temperatures higher than −25℃, resulting in coarsening of the foam structure (Sofjan and Hartel, 2004). In general, storage at temperatures below −30℃ is considered deep frozen storage and lower temperature storage could minimize the quality degradation of ice cream products. However, excessively low temperature storage is not desirable in the energy consumption and storage costs for manufacturers and retailers. This study was carried out to investigate the effect of storage temperature (−18℃, −30℃, −50℃, and −70℃) and storage time (up to 52 wk) on the quality attributes (ice crystal size, air cell size, melt resistance, color) of premium ice cream.

 

Materials and Methods

Sample preparation

In this study, premium vanilla ice cream manufactured from NTR company was selected. Commercial market products were sampled (130 mL) and tested. The samples were directly purchased from the manufacturer to avoid variations among retail stores. The major ingredients of tested ice creams were cream concentrate, skim milk, sugar, egg yolk, and vanilla flavor, with fat content near 12%. All quality attributes were immediately analyzed after purchasing the ice cream (0 wk storage, control).

Frozen storage

Four different frozen storage temperatures were selected including −18℃, −30℃, −50℃, and −70℃. In general, storage at temperatures below −30℃ is considered deep frozen storage. Each quality attribute was analyzed at 4, 8, 12, 16, 28, 40, and 50 wk. Three ice cream products were prepared for each storage temperature and storage time. Control was day 0 sample after direct purchase from retail store.

Quality attributes

Ice crystal size measurement

Ice crystal size was measured using a low temperature stereo microscope (CX40; Olympus, Japan) and organic solvent extraction methods (Fig. 1) described by Min and Lee (1997). The ice crystal measurement system consisted of a cryopolarization microscope (CX40, Olympus, Japan) and CCD camera (VC45CSHR-12, Olympus, Japan) housed in a cold chamber at −50℃. This set-up prevented ice crystal melting during observation. Approximately 0.5 g of ice cream was placed on cold-set slide glass at −50 ℃. Ice crystals were removed from the ice cream matrix using an organic solvent mixture (hexane:kerosene, 0.1:0.9, v:v). The organic solvent mixture was precooled to -50℃ to prevent ice crystal melting before analysis. Separated ice crystals were then placed on a cold tray coupled to a cryostat at −30℃ (RBC-11, JEIO TECH, Korea). Ice crystal size was analyzed with an image analysis program (Image Tool 3.0; UTHSCSA, USA). More than 100 ice crystal images at each experimental condition were acquired for statistical analysis.

Fig. 1.Schematic diagram of the ice crystal and air cell size measurement unit in the cold chamber.

Air cell size measurement

Air cell size was measured at 0-5℃ using an optical microscope (ATC 2000, Leica, Switzerland) coupled with a CCD camera (VC45CSHR-12, Olympus, Japan). Approximately 0.5 g of ice cream was loaded on the slide glass and then slightly depressed. Air cell size was measured as the longest axis using an image analysis program (Image Tool 3.0, UTHSCSA, USA). More than 100 ice crystal images at each experimental condition were acquired for statistical analysis.

Melting resistance

Samples were moved from storage at −18℃, −30℃, −50 ℃, or −70℃ to a −30℃ freezer 24 h before melting analysis for uniform control of the initial temperature. Ice cream samples (130 g) were placed on a mesh grid (10 × 10 mm) and placed in an incubator at 25℃, with a relative humidity of 55%. Molten ice cream dripped into sample trays poised on a balance for weight determination. The weight of molted ice cream was recorded every 1 min. Melting curves were analyzed to determine the melting resistance.

Color measurement

Ice cream color was measured using a portable colorimeter (CR 400, Minolta Co., Japan). The color meter was calibrated with a white standard plate (L* = 97.83, a* = 0.43, b* = 1.98). CIELAB L* indicates the lightness. CIELAB a* and b* indicates for the color-opponent dimensions, based on nonlinearly compressed (e.g., CIE XYZ color space) coordinates. The lightness, L*, represents the darkest black at L* = 0, and the brightest white at L* = 100. The color channels, a* and b*, will represent true neutral gray values at a* = 0 and b* = 0. The red/green opponent colors are represented along the a* axis, with green at negative a* values and red at positive a* values. The yellow/blue opponent colors are represented along the b* axis, with blue at negative b* values and yellow at positive b* values.

Statistical analysis

The data was analyzed using SAS 9.1.3 (SAS Inst. Inc., USA). Fisher’s least-significant difference (LSD) procedure was used for multiple comparisons among treatments at the 95% confidence interval (p<0.05). Multiple comparisons were conducted among different storage temperatures at the same storage period, since this study focused on storage temperature effects. To evaluate the ice crystal size changes (Y) as a function of storage period, ice crystal size as a function of storage time (x) was empirically fitted using logarithmic regression as follows:

 

Results and Discussion

Ice crystal size

Ice crystal sizes for ice cream samples were measured as a function of storage temperature (−18℃, −30℃, −50℃, and, −70℃) and time (0-52 wk). Ice crystal size gradually increased with prolonged storage time (Fig. 2). Low temperatures (−70℃ and −50℃) minimized the growth of ice crystals in comparison to high temperatures (−30℃ and −18℃). For control ice cream, initial ice crystal size was 40.3±3.4 μm, and after 52 wk of storage at −18℃, ice crystal size increased to 100.1±11.9 μm. For ice cream stored for 52 wk at −70℃, ice crystal size increased only slightly from 40.3±3.4 μm to 57.4±3.4 μm. There was no significant difference in ice crystal size for storage temperatures of −50℃ and −70℃ after 12 wk of storage (p>0.05). Our results are consistent with a previous report that indicated that low storage temperature (−45.6℃) produced smaller mean ice crystal size than the −23.2℃ or −26.1℃ storage conditions (Buyck et al., 2011; Cook and Hartel, 2010). Low temperature stereo microscopic images of ice crystals were acquired for ice cream stored at −18 ℃, 30℃, −50℃, and −70℃ for 52 wk. The largest ice crystal size was observed at −18℃, followed by that at −30 ℃, −50℃, and −70℃ (Fig. 3). Smaller ice crystals (< 55-60 μm) in ice cream are more desirable to consumers, as the product is perceived to be less icy and sandy in texture (Buyck et al., 2011). The growth of ice crystals during frozen storage originates in the ice recrystallization stage. Ice recrystallization, also called ripening or coarsening, is the final step of crystallization and produces changes in crystal shape and size as a function of heat- and mass-transfer (Cook and Hartel, 2010). In our study, ice cream stored for up to 52 wk at deep frozen storage temperatures of −70℃ to −50℃ experienced minimal ice recrystallization. Low frozen storage temperatures suppress the molecular mobility and vapor pressure of ice crystals, inhibiting ice recrystallization. The fit of an empirical model to ice crystal size versus storage time are summarized in Table 1. The slope of the fit suggests that ice crystallization and size increase rapidly with increasing temperature for high temperatures (−18℃ to −30℃). However, there were no significant difference in ice recrystallization between −50 and −70℃ storage, meaning that, in terms of ice crystal formation, there is no need to store ice cream below −50℃.

Fig. 2.Changes in ice crystal size at different storage temperatures ( ◇ : −18℃, □ : −30℃, △ : −50℃, ○ : −70℃) and periods (0-52 wk). a-d Values with different letters within the same storage period are significantly different (p<0.05).

Fig. 3.Microscopic images of ice crystals at different storage temperatures: (a) −18℃, (b) −30℃, (c) −50℃, and (d) −70℃ after 52 wk of storage.

Table 1.Estimated coefficients for logarithmic regression of the relationship between ice crystal size (Y) and storage period (x)

Air cell size

Air cell size was measured as a function of storage temperature (−18℃, −30℃, −50℃, and −70℃) and time (0-52 wk). Initial air cell size in the ice cream matrix was 37.1±3.9 μm, and then gradually increased to 87.7±7.3 μm when stored at −18℃ for 52 wk (Fig. 4). Air cell size was 65.4±14.9 μm when stored at 16 weeks at −30℃, and then decreased with further increase in storage time. For the deep frozen storage temperatures (−50℃ and −70℃), no drastic increase in air cell size was observed; air cell size increased from 37.1 μm to 46-47 μm after storage at −50℃ or −70℃.

Fig. 4.Changes in air cell size with different storage temperatures (: −18℃, : −30℃, : −50℃, : −70℃) and time periods (0-52 wk). a-dValues with different letters within the same storage period are significantly different (p<0.05)

Creaminess is related to the distribution of air cells in the ice cream matrix and its overrun. In general, a homogenous distribution of small air cells in the ice cream matrix is desirable since small and dispersed air cells produce a stable foam and creamier mouthfeel (Eisner et al., 2005). Coalescence of air cells leads to the loss of two small bubbles and the formation of a single large bubble, which causes an increase in air cell size (Chang and Hartel, 2002). Smaller air cells with a narrow size distribution improves the rheological properties of ice cream and has a positive influence on creaminess and mouthfeel as the melting ice cream is being consumed (Eisner et al., 2005; Hanselmann and Windhab, 1998). Air cells are in close proximity and coalescence can be an important mechanism that leads to coarsening of the air cells (Chang and Hartel, 2002). We found that changes in air cell size and ice crystal size produced similar trends with respect to storage temperature and time. Similar associations of small ice crystal size with narrow air cell distributions have been previously reported (Flores and Goff, 1999; Park et al., 2006; Sofjan and Hartel, 2004). We found that ice cream storage at low temperatures (−50℃ and −70℃) minimized changes in air cell size, probably as a result of suppressed vapor pressure and decreased mass- and heat-transfer.

Melt resistance

We characterized ice cream melting resistance by measuring the amount of time required for melting. Overall, the time required for melting increased with an increase in storage time for −18℃ and −30℃; however, no clear trends were observed for storage temperatures of −50℃ and −70℃ (Fig. 5). Ice cream melting was evaluated by measuring the weight of molten ice cream as a function of time. The ice cream sample stored at −18℃ gradually melted up to about 20 g at 3 h, and then melted drastically, with a nearly vertical melting curve. A similar trend was observed for the sample stored at −30℃, but not for the samples stored at −50℃ or −70℃, which melted continuously (Fig. 6). The melting resistance of ice cream is affected by many factors, including the amount of air incorporated, the nature of the ice crystals, and the network of fat globules formed during freezing (Bolliger et al. 2000; Muse and Hartel, 2004). A uniform distribution of small ice crystals and air cells results in gradual melting, a phenomenon that can be attributed to a reduced rate of heat transfer, since the trapped air functions as thermal resistance layers (Muse and Hartel, 2004; Sakurai et al., 1996). We found that a homogenous distribution of small ice crystals and air cells is associated with melting resistance.

Fig. 5.Changes in melting time for different storage temperatures ( : −18℃, : −30℃, : −50℃, : −70℃) and periods (0-52 wk). a-dValues with different letters within the same storage period are significantly different (p<0.05).

Fig. 6.Melting curves of ice cream as a function of time: (a) −18℃, (b) −30℃, (c) −50℃, and (d) −70℃ after 52 wk of storage.

Color

The color of frozen and molten ice cream was assessed using colorimetry. Since a* and b* values were not significantly influenced by storage temperature and time, only the L* value was reported in Fig. 7. The L* value, which indicates whiteness, is one of the most important parameters for vanilla ice cream since consumers prefer lighter ice cream colors with enhanced whiteness. The control ice cream produced an L* value of 85.2±2.2, which decreased with prolonged storage times at −18℃ or −30℃, but not for temperatures of −50℃ or −70℃, for which L* did not change significantly (p<0.05). The whiteness of dairy products is influenced by several factors that include light scattering by fat and protein particles (Metzger et al., 2000; Rudan et al., 1999). In our study, low temperature storage at −50℃ or −70℃ delayed changes in L* values of ice cream with minimization of milk fat and protein denaturation.

Fig. 7.Changes in L* values for different storage temperatures ( : −18℃, : −30℃, : −50℃, : −70℃). a-dValues with different letters within the same storage period are significantly different (p<0.05).

References

  1. Bolliger, S., Goff, H. D., and Tharp, B. W. (2000) Correlation between colloidal properties of ice cream mix and ice cream. Int. Dairy J. 10, 303-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-6946(00)00044-3
  2. Buyck , J. R., Baer , R. J., and Choi, J. (2011) Effect of storage temperature on quality of light and full-fat ice cream. J. Dairy Sci. 94, 2213-2219. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3897
  3. Caillet, A., Cogné, C., Andrieu, J., Laurent, P., and Rivoire, A. (2003) Characterization of ice cream structure by direct optical microscopy. Influence of freezing parameters. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 36, 743-749. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0023-6438(03)00094-X
  4. Chang, Y. and Hartel, R. W. (2002) Stability of air cells in ice cream during hardening and storage. J. Food Eng. 55, 59-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(01)00242-4
  5. Choi, M. J. and Shin, K. S. (2014) Studies on physical and sensory properties of premium vanilla ice cream distributed in Korean market. Korean J. Food Sci. An. 34, 757-762. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2014.34.6.757
  6. Cook, K. L. K. and Hartel, R. W. (2010) Mechanisms of ice crystallization in ice cream production. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 9, 213-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2009.00101.x
  7. Eisner, M. D., Wildmoser, H., and Windhab, E. J. (2005) Air cell microstructuring in a high viscous ice cream matrix. Colloids Surf., A. 263, 390-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2004.12.017
  8. Flores, A. A. and Goff, H. D. (1999) Ice crystal size distributions in dynamically frozen model solutions and ice cream as affected by stabilizers. J. Dairy Sci. 82, 1399-1407. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75366-X
  9. Goff, H. D. (2008) Review 65 years of ice cream science. Int. Dairy J. 18, 754-758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2008.03.006
  10. Hagiwara, T. and Hartel, R. W. (1996) Effect of sweetener, stabilizer and storage temperature on ice recrystallization in ice cream. J. Dairy Sci. 79, 735-744. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(96)76420-2
  11. Hanselmann, W. and Windhab, E. (1998) Flow characteristics and modelling of foam generation in a continuous rotor/stator mixer. J. Food Eng. 38, 393-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(98)00129-0
  12. International Dairy Foods Association. (1997) Ice Cream and Frozen Novelties Code of Recommended Handling Practices. Proceed. Washington, DC., USA, pp. 6.
  13. Metzger, L. E., Barbano, D. M., Rudan, M. A., Kindstedt, P. S., and Guo, M. R. (2000) Whiteness change during heating and cooling of mozzarella cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 83, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)74847-8
  14. Min, S. G. and Lee, S. (1997) Changes of ice crystal size under different storage conditions of ice cream. Korean J. Food Sci. An. 17, 125-127.
  15. Muse, M. R. and Hartel, R. W. (2004) Ice cream structural elements that affect melting rate and hardness. J. Dairy Sci. 87, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73135-5
  16. Park, S. H., Hong, G. P., Kim, J. Y., Choi, M. J., and Min, S. G. (2006) The influence of food hydrocolloids on changes in the physical properties of ice cream. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 15, 721-727.
  17. Rudan, M. A., Barbano, D. M., Yun, J. J., and Kindstedt, P. S. (1999) Mozzarella cheese: effect of fat reduction on chemical composition, proteolysis, functionality, and yield. J. Dairy Sci. 82, 661-672. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75282-3
  18. Sakurai, K., Kokubo, S., Hakamata, K., Tomita, M., and Yoshida, S. (1996) Effect of production conditions on ice cream melting resistance and hardness. Milchwissenschaft 51, 451-454.
  19. Sofjan, R. P. and Hartel, R. W. (2004) Effects of overrun on structural and physical characteristics of ice cream. Int. Dairy J. 14, 255-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2003.08.005
  20. Trgo, C., Koxholt, M., and Kessler, H. G. (1999) Effect of freezing point and texture regulating parameters on the initial ice crystal growth in ice cream. J. Dairy Sci. 82, 460-465. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75254-9

Cited by

  1. Effect of fat content on the physical properties and consumer acceptability of vanilla ice cream vol.100, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-12379
  2. Physicochemical, rheological, and sensory properties of low-fat ice cream designed by double emulsions vol.119, pp.9, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.201600505
  3. Lactobacillus paracasei probiotic properties and survivability under stress-induced by processing and storage of ice cream bar or ice-lolly vol.48, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20170601
  4. Effect of roselle extracts on the selected quality characteristics of ice cream vol.22, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2019.1567535
  5. Physical Properties and Microstructure of Ice Cream Supplemented With Minor Components of Wheat Germ Oil vol.15, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3923/ijds.2020.189.199
  6. Microstructure and Physicochemical Properties of Light Ice Cream: Effects of Extruded Microparticulated Whey Proteins and Process Design vol.10, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10061433
  7. Influence of coconut residue dietary fiber on physicochemical, probiotic (Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC 8014) survivability and sensory attributes of probiotic ice cream vol.154, pp.None, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112725