과제정보
연구 과제 주관 기관 : Ministry of Health & Welfare
참고문헌
- Meisner AL, Fekrazad MH, Royce ME. Breast disease: benign and malignant. Med Clin North Am 2008;92:1115-1141 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2008.04.003
- Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, Woolf SH. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002;137(5 Part 1):347-360 https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-137-5_Part_1-200209030-00012
- ACR. Cancer Facts & Figures 2012. American Cancer Society. Web site. http://www.cancer.org/. Published 2012, Accessed May 2, 2013
- Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, Yaffe M, Baum JK, Acharyya S, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1773-1783 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa052911
- Pisano ED, Hendrick RE, Yaffe MJ, Baum JK, Acharyya S, Cormack JB, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST. Radiology 2008;246:376-383 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2461070200
- Bloomquist AK, Yaffe MJ, Pisano ED, Hendrick RE, Mawdsley GE, Bright S, et al. Quality control for digital mammography in the ACRIN DMIST trial: part I. Med Phys 2006;33:719-736 https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2163407
- Sivaramakrishna R, Obuchowski NA, Chilcote WA, Cardenosa G, Powell KA. Comparing the performance of mammographic enhancement algorithms: a preference study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:45-51 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.175.1.1750045
- Goldstraw EJ, Castellano I, Ashley S, Allen S. The effect of Premium View post-processing software on digital mammographic reporting. Br J Radiol 2010;83:122-128 https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/96554696
- Chen B, Wang W, Huang J, Zhao M, Cui G, Xu J, et al. Comparison of tissue equalization, and premium view postprocessing methods in full field digital mammography. Eur J Radiol 2010;76:73-80 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.05.010
- del Carmen MG, Halpern EF, Kopans DB, Moy B, Moore RH, Goss PE, et al. Mammographic breast density and race. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:1147-1150 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.06.0619
- Jackson VP, Hendrick RE, Feig SA, Kopans DB. Imaging of the radiographically dense breast. Radiology 1993;188:297-301 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.188.2.8327668
- Ko ES, Han BK, Kim SM, Ko EY, Jang M, Lyou CY, et al. Comparison of new and established full-field digital mammography systems in diagnostic performance. Korean J Radiol 2013;14:164-170 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2013.14.2.164
- ACR. Mammography Quality Control Manual. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 1999
- Laine AF, Schuler S, Fan J, Huda W. Mammographic feature enhancement by multiscale analysis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1994;13:725-740 https://doi.org/10.1109/42.363095
- Strickland RN, Hahn HI. Wavelet transforms for detecting microcalcifications in mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1996;15:218-229 https://doi.org/10.1109/42.491423
- Kallergi M, Clarke LP, Qian W, Gavrielides M, Venugopal P, Berman CG, et al. Interpretation of calcifications in screen/film, digitized, and wavelet-enhanced monitor-displayed mammograms: a receiver operating characteristic study. Acad Radiol 1996;3:285-293 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1076-6332(96)80240-6
- Li Y, Poulos A, McLean D, Rickard M. A review of methods of clinical image quality evaluation in mammography. Eur J Radiol 2010;74:e122-e131 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.04.069
- Pisano ED, Cole EB, Major S, Zong S, Hemminger BM, Muller KE, et al. Radiologists' preferences for digital mammographic display. The International Digital Mammography Development Group. Radiology 2000;216:820-830 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.216.3.r00se48820
- Schueller G, Riedl CC, Mallek R, Eibenberger K, Langenberger H, Kaindl E, et al. Image quality, lesion detection, and diagnostic efficacy in digital mammography: full-field digital mammography versus computed radiography-based mammography using digital storage phosphor plates. Eur J Radiol 2008;67:487-496 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.08.016
- Skaane P, Balleyguier C, Diekmann F, Diekmann S, Piguet JC, Young K, et al. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study. Radiology 2005;237:37-44 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2371041605
- Good WF, Sumkin JH, Dash N, Johns CM, Zuley ML, Rockette HE, et al. Observer sensitivity to small differences: a multipoint rank-order experiment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;173:275-278 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.173.2.10430118
피인용 문헌
- Significance and Application of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for the BI-RADS Classification of Breast Cancer vol.16, pp.9, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.9.4109
- Performance of Screening Mammography: A Report of the Alliance for Breast Cancer Screening in Korea vol.17, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2016.17.4.489
- Does the Reporting Quality of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies, as Defined by STARD 2015, Affect Citation? vol.17, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2016.17.5.706
- Selection and Reporting of Statistical Methods to Assess Reliability of a Diagnostic Test: Conformity to Recommended Methods in a Peer-Reviewed Journal vol.18, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2017.18.6.888
- Digital breast tomosynthesis improves diagnostic accuracy of breast microcalcifications vol.31, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1002/ima.22481